Brad Maloney: From the class of 1991 to Joeys coach

Brad Moloney

Few supporters who witnessed the gallant deeds of the 1991 Australian World Youth Cup squad as they progressed to the semi finals of the tournament – only to be eliminated by the host nation Portugal via a Rui Costa piledriver – would question the squad’s claim to being our greatest ever youth side.

The names just rattle off the tongue with talent like Bosnich, Kalac, Popovic, Muscat, Okon, Seal, Stanton, Corica, Bingley, Sorras and Babic directed by the coaching supremo, Les Scheinflug.

Significantly, Brad Maloney, the current Joeys coach, shared that wonderful journey with his team-mates in the Class of ’91.

All those years may have past but Maloney still carries the tradition of the famous squad in his DNA and is looking forward with great confidence to the Joey’s first Asian Cup match against Saudi Arabia on June 16 in Thailand.

At stake in this series is a place in the World Cup later this year.

In this interview with Roger Sleeman, Brad Maloney discusses the squad’s preparation for the tournament and his expectations, the realities of Australian youth football and his commitment to the Australian game after his eight-year coaching stint in Malaysia.

ROGER SLEEMAN

Was it a hard decision to return to Australia after all those years in Malaysia and Asia?

BRAD MALONEY

I thoroughly enjoyed my time in Asia working with some great people and for eight years I was fortunate to work with national teams at all levels from youth teams to the senior squads.

To come home was a pleasant surprise for me as it’s always good to work in your home country and I really enjoy the task with these young players we have here at the moment.

R.S.

Harking back to the 1991 World Youth team, what are the emotions which are evoked?

B.M.

Great memories I’ll never forget and the team, camaraderie and spirit were unbelievable.

The quality of the players in the squad was fantastic and our achievements from humble backgrounds – going to Portugal and reaching the semi finals in front of 120,000 home supporters against the likes of Luis Figo, Rui Costa and Joao Pinto who all had magnificent careers, was unforgettable.

It would be nice to replicate such success with the current youth teams.

R.S.

Is the 1991 success the benchmark which you would set for yourself in your current position?

B.M.

Had a similar conversation with somebody the other day about previously reaching the semi finals of the u/20 competition in 1991 and Barcelona Olympics in 1992.

We’ve done it in the past and I would like to recapture that glory and perhaps go one better.

R.S.

From the very outset when you were appointed to the role last August, what was your initial strategy to get things right?

B.M.

I cut my stay in Malaysia and came back to Australia as soon as I could, scouting players and identifying even more talent. We had a monitoring list which had been put together but I knew I had to build on that and widen the net for talent which has happened in the last ten months or so.

Therefore, the squad we’ve assembled for this Asian Cup is competitive and with good preparation in the next few weeks and good acclimatisation, I believe we can achieve something.

R.S

Realistically, can you really be happy with only 16 days preparation?

B.M.

A lot of other nations in Asia are already full-time at this age, even some from the age of 12 meaning by this tournament stage, they’ve been together full-time for 4-5 years.

We could do things differently but at the moment players are with their clubs.

R.S.

Talking about preparation, do you think the players have had adequate development in their formative stages and up to now?

B.M.

We’re relying on A-League and NPL academies to influence the player’s development and it would be great to have the best players playing together in a full-time environment against high-level opposition.

Unfortunately, at the moment a lot of these players aren’t playing at senior level or in first team football.

R.S.

Are you happy with the technical level of our players?

B.M.

Every country brings its own culture of playing styles and a number of the Asian countries are technically gifted, but I don’t think we’re too far off.

Physically we have a presence which we try to combine with technical aptitude.

R.S.

Are you happy with your current coaching staff?

B.M.

I am and they were in place when I took up the role – very knowledgeable, loyal and there is a great respect amongst us.

Moving forward we could add more expertise but at the moment we’re doing well.

R.S.

Who are the key players in the squad, those who could make the difference?

B.M.

Nestory Irankunda is a huge talent with all the headlines he’s made in the last few months and he was involved early in our qualification phase.

He’s now ready to be involved in a big way in these Asian Cup matches and the other key players are the Central Coast pair Miguel de Piccio and Anthony Pavlesic and Sydney F.C.’s Mitch Glassen.

Also, the core group we’ve had up to now know what to expect from me. Hopefully, the squad will jell in the lead up to the first game.

R.S.

If you were Carl Veart would you have started with Irankunda in the return leg of the semi-final against the Mariners?

B.M.

That’s the coach’s decision.

Obviously, Carl knows his capabilities and how to manage his abilities because he works with him every day and when he has come on the pitch he’s made a massive impact.

R.S.

What do you know about your opponents in the Asian Cup and how good are they based on your advanced information?

B.M.

The Saudis have played about a dozen friendly matches leading into the tournament and we expect them to be good quality and very tough.

We met China in the qualifiers, and though we got a result that day, we do expect improvement from them and another challenging match.

Tajikistan were actually in the finals last time when they met Japan and will also be hard to beat. Luckily, two viewings of their matches before playing us will be a big help for our chances.

The top two teams qualify for the quarter finals and our crossover group is Japan, Uzbekistan, Vietnam and India. The winner of the quarter final will qualify for the World Cup.

R.S.

Beyond this, what are your short term to medium term plans in coaching?

B.M.

I love working in national team setups as I’m now familiar with the landscape, particularly in Australian space. My fervent aim is to achieve with this current group.

R.S.

Would you return overseas?

B.M.

I’d never say never and I’m still in contact with the people I worked with in South East Asia, but at the moment my focus is to achieve success with Australia.

R.S

Looking back to 91, so few of those players are involved in the game. How can we change that?

B.M.

There’s not a lot of opportunity, illustrated by only Popovic,  Muscat, Okon, Corica and I working full-time in the game.

However, I’m definitely all for fast tracking Socceroos but you have to have the right people for the right job in the right environment.

R.S.

Your opinion of the A-League?

B.M.

I’ve seen many matches since I’ve been back in the country, including the Sydney derbies and the final series.

I believe the overall standard of football is high.

R.S.

Your former team-mate Steve Corica has a wealth of young talent at Sydney F.C.

Isn’t it time he cleared the deck of older players and gave these youngsters their chance, just as he was given a break to play senior football at Marconi all those years ago?

B.M.

Steve is a very experienced coach and I’m sure he’ll make the right calls.

Previous ArticleNext Article

South Melbourne’s A-League dream is still a bridge too far

The A-League has just lost a Victorian club. The death of Western United and the suspension of its license by the Australian Professional Leagues (APL) on August 10th was inevitable. The club says it wants to rebuild and eventually return to the competition. That is unlikely to happen considering the search for new owners has to begin.

But one day after the announcement from Western United, South Melbourne stepped forward. The four-time NSL winners announced their intention to begin formal discussions with the APL about joining the A-Leagues. They believe the timing is right. Their argument is understandable. Their football credentials and history are stronger than most A-League teams.

But there is a problem. South Melbourne may have the history. It may have the supporters. It may even have one of the most attractive potential derbies in Australian football. But that does not mean it will get an A-League licence.

In fact, the more realistic prediction from my perspective is that South Melbourne will once again be told no.

South Melbourne has never been better placed

There is plenty to like about South Melbourne’s position. The club is not simply relying on its history. South Melbourne returned to national competition through the inaugural Australian Championship in 2025. It did not merely participate. South Melbourne won it. The club defeated Marconi Stallions 2-0 in the final to become the competition’s first champion.

That achievement matters. The Australian Championship was created to bridge state-based football and the professional game. Whilst it is seen as a second tier, there is no promotion and relegation with the A-League. But it has also continued to perform on the national stage. In the 2026 Australia Cup, which South Melbourne qualified for, they reached the final rounds and then produced one of the biggest results of the tournament.

Adelaide United came to Lakeside Stadium. South Melbourne won 2-1. Adelaide had won the Australia Cup three times. South knocked them out in front of its own supporters. They’re now into the quarter-finals of the 2026 Australia Cup.

South Melbourne celebrating the Australian Championship Image Credits: South Melbourne FC

The club also has a much bigger story to tell than its recent results. Alongside its four NSL victories, the club also won the 1999 Oceania Club Championship and represented Oceania at the 2000 FIFA Club World Championship. The club has a dedicated supporter base and the history to deserve a place.

The club says its Oceania Professional League participation has helped make it Australia’s 13th professional football club. It has more than 150 businesses supporting it in 2026 and a long-term arrangement at Lakeside Stadium, in the heart of South Melbourne.

On the football side, it wants to continue competing in the NPL, Australian Championship and Oceania competition even if it enters the A-Leagues. It also has lofty ambitions to introduce an A-League women’s side.

On paper, it is difficult to argue that South Melbourne is not ready. The problem is that readiness and admission are two different things.

Third time’s the charm?

South Melbourne’s current push is not new. It has been here before. The club was pursuing an A-League return almost immediately after the NSL disappeared. In 2007, South announced its interest in becoming the second Victorian A-League club.

Then came the 2008-09 process. South Melbourne backed the Southern Cross bid for the second Victorian licence. The club proposed a new team based around the redevelopment of Bob Jane Stadium and involvement from the broader Victorian football community.

It lost. The Melbourne Heart bid won the race and eventually became Melbourne City. That was South Melbourne’s first major warning. Its football heritage was not enough. Its second major attempt came almost a decade later.

The 2017-18 expansion process produced the most serious South Melbourne bid yet. South made the shortlist for an expanded A-League licence. It ultimately lost to Western United. Bill Papastergiadis has since explained that he did not genuinely expect South Melbourne to win in 2018, despite believing strongly that the club belonged in the A-League. He also reflected on the barriers facing a traditional club trying to enter the existing Victorian professional football ecosystem.

That is important context for today’s bid. South Melbourne is not entering negotiations without understanding how difficult the politics and economics of the Victorian football market can be. The club has tried the direct route twice. Neither time worked.

The Western United lesson

This is where the current situation becomes complicated. In isolation, adding South Melbourne would be fantastic for the A-League. Imagine South Melbourne against Melbourne Victory. The atmosphere would be enormous.

There is a genuine football rivalry waiting to happen. South itself points to the potential for ready-made derbies and commercial interest. But the argument that Melbourne should simply have three A-League clubs because Melbourne is a huge city ignores what has just happened to Western United.

Western United was supposed to represent Melbourne’s rapidly growing west. Its original vision centred on a major project in Geelong. The club eventually moved into Ironbark Fields in Tarneit in 2024.

Yet the geographic separation never became as clear as the original concept suggested. Western United was not a Geelong club. It was not a regional Victorian club in the traditional sense. It was a western Melbourne club based and that matters.

The A-League already has Melbourne City and Melbourne Victory. Adding South Melbourne would give the competition three clubs operating within the same metropolitan football market. It is not necessarily brilliant for the business model, which has already lost a club operating on the outskirts of Melbourne.

The NSL offers an interesting historical comparison. The Falcons provide an even more striking Victorian example. They became the first and only regional Victorian club to play in the NSL, reaching the finals in 1996. The distinction is important.

A national competition can expand its footprint by adding genuinely new markets. That is different from adding another club inside an existing Melbourne metropolitan market. That was what was envisioned for Western United, and it failed quickly.

Will the APL see South Melbourne as a safe investment? Despite the fact they’re a well-established club, I’d argue the answer is no.

Promotion and relegation is the only realistic route

There is one scenario where South Melbourne could eventually force its way into the A-League, and that’s the great missing piece of Australian football. Promotion and relegation. South Melbourne would not need somebody to decide that Melbourne suddenly has room for another licence. It would simply need to earn it.

They would have done just that in 2025, winning the Australian Championship if the football pyramid was open. Football Australia originally designed the National Second Tier with the possibility of promotion and relegation being considered once the competition matured.

The format connects NPL clubs and established foundation clubs with national competition. It does not provide a sporting pathway into the A-League. South Melbourne can win the Australian Championship, NSL and Australia Cup but none of those achievements automatically produce an A-League licence.

South Melbourne in the Oceania Championship Image Credits: Oceania Championship

Opening the pyramid is far more complicated than simply announcing promotion and relegation. Australia’s football calendar is fragmented. The A-League operates primarily through the summer months. The NPL operates through the winter and early spring. For the 2026-27 season, the A-League Men runs from October to June, while the NPL begins in February and finishes in September.

That creates an enormous structural problem for a fully connected pyramid. The clubs below the A-League would need to operate at a level capable of supporting professional football. If the A-League aligned with the NPL and the lower pyramid, it would compete in a football calendar that already has to coexist with Australia’s other major winter sports. That is a difficult feat against bigger leagues such as the AFL and NRL.

Beyond that, clubs lower down would need travel budgets and to survive commercially would take real sacrifice from all parties to make that work. The A-League’s existing clubs also have something to lose. They have invested heavily in their licences and their businesses.

Historically, A-League licences were extended through to 2034, while those licence arrangements have included provisions allowing promotion and relegation to be introduced. But the existing clubs will do everything in their power to block it. Promotion and relegation removes certainty. An A-League club can finish last in the current system with no threat to their place. Under relegation, its place is no longer guaranteed.

That is a major commercial change for clubs that have invested in securing their position in the competition. It is therefore difficult to imagine the A-League opening the door. The A-League’s licensing system gives the competition enormous control over who enters, and for South Melbourne historically they’ve been left out in the cold.

South Melbourne deserves the conversation.

The frustrating part is South Melbourne has probably never had a stronger argument. It has history, supporters, infrastructure, commercial support and most importantly, ambition. Beating A-League clubs in national competition proves the capability is there.

It deserves to be in the conversation. But being in the conversation is not the same as being selected. The Western United experience should be a warning. If the A-League could not make the Western United project work, it is difficult to see why it would suddenly decide that another Melbourne club is the answer.

South Melbourne may be the better football story. It may even be the better football club. But the A-League is not simply selecting the best football story.

It is selecting a professional competition, and until Australia embraces a genuine promotion and relegation system, South Melbourne’s path back to the top flight will remain dependent on someone handing it a licence.

That is the part of the dream that looks unrealistic. South Melbourne can keep knocking and it should. They always say third time’s the charm. But unless the pyramid is opened, I expect the door to remain closed.

APL and PFA remain without agreement as bargaining tensions continue

The Australian Professional Leagues (APL) and Professional Footballers Australia (PFA) remain without a new collective bargaining agreement, with negotiations continuing less than three months before the start of the 2026–27 A-Leagues season.

The APL presented the players’ union with a new one-year interim proposal on August 5, which included an increase to the A-League Women salary cap and a commitment to establish a pathway towards full-time professionalism for the women’s competition within 12 months.

The proposed agreement would provide an interim framework while the two parties continue discussions over a longer-term collective bargaining agreement.

APL chief executive Steve Rosich said the proposal reflected the league’s commitment to reaching a sustainable agreement with players following eight months of negotiations.

However, the PFA criticised the APL for publicly announcing the proposal shortly after presenting it to the union, arguing that the approach had further damaged trust between the two parties.

PFA Chief Executive Beau Busch also said players had overwhelmingly rejected the APL’s previous final offer, citing a lack of trust in the league’s ability to ensure its future.

Full-time professionalism for the A-League Women remains a key priority for the PFA, with players seeking improved conditions and greater investment in the competition.

The A-League Men and A-League Women seasons are both scheduled to begin on 16 October 2026.

With the new season approaching, both parties face pressure to resolve the dispute and establish the framework governing player conditions across the A-Leagues.

 

 

Most Popular Topics

Editor Picks

Send this to a friend