Brisbane Strikers looking into future for training venue

Brisbane Strikers are in discussion with both the Brisbane City Council and Queensland State Government about how to use their training venue for next year’s Women’s World Cup as a springboard for the future.

Strikers Chairperson Julianna Suranyi stated the club is ‘immensely proud’ of their selection, and although they are not in line to receive funding from FIFA, talks with both levels of government regarding an upgrade to the Strikers’ home of Perry Park has been positive.

“It’s fresh at the moment since the announcement, so we’re just in talks now as to what we need. Some of [FIFA’s] expectation is that upgrades are self-funded, however at this point in time the different government levels we’ve spoken to have all shown great interest,” Suranyi told Soccerscene.

“An upgrade would drive traffic and drive tourism, those key components that the state government are looking at. They need to be driving tourism and further employment, so I’ve found they’ve been open to it.”

Suranyi provided insight into FIFA’s selection process for the training venues, and stated their only request to the Strikers was a marginal upgrade to their pitch’s drainage system. “The ground itself is where I think the bulk of the interest was. We’re one of the only clubs that has a full time groundsman, so we put a lot of time, effort and energy into that. The process was them coming out, having a look at the venue, looking at the grass, and basically just testing the field,” she said.

“FIFA went through the facilities of where they can actually house a team whilst they are on premises, what potential security issues need to be sorted through, and also accessibility to the public was also important to them. They looked at the asset management side, then looked at the field integrity side, and we passed each one.”Suryani was insistent the club is not looking to leverage their selection into the development of a 30,000 seat facility, labelling any such suggestion as ‘garbage.’ While an extension of Perry Park’s current 5,000 seat capacity was not ruled out, Suranyi stated the government has left them in no doubt that a full-scale redevelopment will not occur. “There has been word in the media that we are looking at building up to a 30,000 seat stadium, which is completely incorrect. It’s gone out a number of times and we’ve never commented on it to this point, but it’s a rumour, it’s garbage,” she said.

“We had a meeting with (Queensland Minister for Tourism, Innovation and Sport) Stirling Hinchcliffe and he made it very clear they are not interested in another stadium of that size. One thing they’ve made very clear for the World Cup and going into the Olympics is that any assets need to be managed ongoing, and not at  huge government expense.

“The most we would be looking at doing is increasing it to potentially a 10,000 seat stadium, but that’s a maybe, and we’ll be working with the YMCA with that because they are also part of this with us.”Instead, the Strikers are putting foundations in place to capitalise on the Women’s World Cup on the field, committing to the development of a women’s team. The club has been in long-term consultation with an unnamed club that Suranyi regards as an excellent example of a women’s program.

“We’re working with another club that runs a women’s program and runs it well. We’re studying that model, so the legacy will be that we can launch very effectively, efficiently and offer the highest resources we can. “Since the announcement of the World Cup, clubs now want to run women’s programs because of the amount of funding available. Our mantra is if you’re going to do it, do it well and keep doing it. It’s not a snatch and grab situation, we’ll make the commitment and drive it through indefinitely.

“We feel really honoured with this selection, and I mean that sincerely. It’s one thing to say, ‘you’re a central location’, it’s another thing to be acknowledged for all the hard work the board has put in. We fund a full-time CEO, a full-time groundsman, and the pride we’ve taken in being selected is immense. We absolutely see it as a point of difference in the club’s long term growth and development.”

Previous ArticleNext Article

Capital Football Introduces Pink Armband to Protect Junior Referees

Capital Football has launched a visible identification program for referees under 18, requiring them to wear a pink armband during matches. It’s intended to build awareness surrounding the concern across Australian football about the abuse driving young officials out of the game.

The Pink Armband Initiative, effective immediately across Capital Football’s competitions in the ACT and surrounding region, makes junior referees identifiable to players, coaches and spectators. The federation says the marker is designed to set clear behavioural expectations and signal that many match officials are minors still developing their skills.

Capital Football acknowledged a referee crisis as far back as 2022, at which point it restructured its entire referee department in partnership with Football Australia. The pink armband program is the latest layer of that response; this time by targeting the cultural conditions on match day rather than systems of recruitment and pay.

A problem that spans codes and states

Research has consistently linked referee abuse to declining retention rates, with officials quitting in growing numbers due to sustained mistreatment, a trend researchers warn will reduce the pool of skilled match officials available at all levels of the game. Studies also show that young, less experienced referees are disproportionately likely to be subject to abuse.

Capital Football is not alone in reaching for a visible solution. Similar programs operate across Football Queensland, Football South Australia, Football South Coast and several other federations, while Basketball Victoria and Basketball South Australia have adopted comparable measures through the Green Whistle initiative. The spread of these programs across codes and states reflects a shared administrative problem: many grassroots referees are teenagers and volunteers who do not officiate for money but because they love the game, and abuse is eroding that foundation.

For a federation overseeing nearly 29,000 registered players, fewer referees means fewer matches. Fewer matches means reduced participation. The pink armband is a low-cost intervention with structural consequences if it works.

Compliance and competition: Everton ordered to pay compensation following major verdict

In a landmark decision by the Premier League Independent Disciplinary Commission, Everton must now pay Burnley upwards of AUD 66 million (£35 million) after breaching financial rules in the 2021-22 season.

Behind the verdict

Playing in the Premier League is, in itself, one of the most lucrative positions for a club to be in. This year’s Championship Play-off final – a contest deemed ‘the richest match in football’ – guaranteed winners Hull City a revenue uplift of AUD 389 million (£205 million) according to Deloitte’s Sports Business Group.

It is no wonder, therefore, why teams are so desperate to stay at the top of the pyramid, especially given that relegation can lead to heavy financial hits in revenue, wage reduction and transfer spending power.

Competition is certain – and the football is all the better for it. But when this competitive edge overtakes compliance, what happens off the field is just as impactful.

In 2023, the Premier League charged Everton with breaching financial rules during the 2021-22 season – the same season which saw the Toffees finish just four points above relegated Burnley. Everton received an initial 10-point deduction, which ultimately decreased to six points on appeal.

That season, Everton stayed up. But for Burnley, had the points deduction come at an earlier date, their survival in the top-flight may have been secured.

 

What did the ruling find?

In its verdict, the Premier League’s Independent Disciplinary Commission deemed that Everton gained a competitive advantage over Burnley as a result of financial breaches.

Burnley will now receive AUD 66 million (£35 million) in compensation from Everton, although the Merseyside club will appeal the  commission’s decision.

“This ruling sets a dangerous and unworkable precedent for English football, given it is constructed on a principle that a club can be in breach of financial rules at any point in a financial year,” Everton said via an official club statement.

Burnley, on the other hand, reaffirmed its position that the case was a question of fair play and ensuring a level playing field.

“Our action has always been about making football fair,” the club said via an official statement.

“Clubs that comply with the rules deserve to compete on a level playing field. Fans deserve it. The sport demands it.”

 

The impact of the case

This is a landmark decision which may have profound effects on the future of financial compliance in English football.

In the past, financial breaches remained within the realm of just that – finances. But with the ruling between Everton and Burnley, it now opens up further questions on what compliance is actually worth in the game.

And whether future investigations may lead to similar – or even higher – compensation packages to affected clubs.

Most Popular Topics

Editor Picks

Send this to a friend