How the Indigenous Football Council plans to improve pathways

IFA Council

As Australia’s longest running and most successful Indigenous football initiative for 2–18-year-olds, the John Moriarty Football (JMF) program has been a significant contributor to creating sustainable social change and providing pathways for Indigenous footballers and their communities.

The establishment of the Indigenous Football Australia (IFA) Council has been designed to wholly embrace young Indigenous players, with the Australian Professional Leagues and A-Leagues heavily involved to help facilitate determined change.

As the overarching body overseeing the strategic direction of JMF, the IFA has initiated a council to help create exponential social change through football, expand JMF and ensure more equitable access to the great game of football for grassroots and elite Indigenous players.

The 16-member IFA Council has majority Indigenous membership, and is gender equal, with each member brought onboard to bring their unique, lived experience, skills, aligned values and goals for Indigenous football in Australia. Each is committed to creating tangible, equitable and lasting change.

In a wide-ranging conversation with Soccerscene, IFA Council convenor and JMF Program Director Jamie Morriss discussed the plans and estimated impact of the IFA Council on supporting Indigenous communities around Australia.

Jamie Morriss

What was the process of organising and initiating the Indigenous Football Australia Council like?

Jamie Morriss: We identified strong individuals with a range of skills to support the strategic direction of John Moriarty Football (JMF). We wanted a cross-section of individuals in different professional capacities across media, academia and sport – which includes previous Socceroos and Matildas on the council who we believe are really powerful and can help provide us some fantastic insights and direction for the program moving forward. And obviously Adam Goodes being an Indigenous professional athlete himself, his insight is going to be invaluable to understanding how we can really support players coming through the pathways in our program.

The advisory board includes the likes of APL CEO Danny Townsend, Liberty A-Leagues stars Jada Whyman and Allira Toby, and AFL legend Adam Goodes. How do you feel their experience and knowledge will help to guide the council going forward?

Jamie Morriss: They all bring a fantastic range of experience and knowledge that we can draw on. Obviously, Jada being a current player in and around the Matildas squad means she’s lived and breathed the experience of moving away from home to Sydney for her schooling and to follow her professional pathway in football. This is invaluable because we have scholarship players that we support in Sydney and we hope to grow this initiative and provide more opportunities to Indigenous players from regional and remote areas.

Jada’s lived experience is really important because she’ll be very conscious of what’s needed to be successful in that pathway. Because we know it can be quite difficult to move away from home and not feel as connected to Country and culture and Jada’s definitely someone who can offer support with this.

What is the IFA Council striving for? What is its purpose within football in Australia?

Jamie Morriss: Having expanded our program from two communities in the Northern Territory to 19 of them across three states, our vision is to continue growing and maximising JMF across Australia and providing the benefits to more Indigenous communities.

Eventually we’d like to see the program being offered across each state as a national program. The IFA Council’s purpose is to guide that strategic direction and look at how we can continue to improve the program that we’re currently delivering.

This feels like an overdue step in a positive direction for football in Australia, how is the IFA Council looking to expand on the work done by JMF?

Jamie Morriss: For over a decade, JMF has developed a successful model that uses the power of football to transform the lives of Indigenous children, families and communities. The IFA Council was appointed to help supercharge this success.

The IFA Council members bring expertise across different sections of professional football, media and academia. By leveraging this strength we will be able to expand JMF and also continue to develop all aspects of the program. For instance, having Prof. Gail Garvey – who is a leading Indigenous health researcher – on the IFA Council will hopefully help us improve the health outcomes of our program.

Jamie Morriss IFA

As an expansion to John Moriarty Football, what initiatives will the IFA Council be looking to implement to grow opportunities and create sustainable social change for Indigenous youth and communities?

Jamie Morriss: The main areas the IFA Council will focus on initially is the future growth and sustainability of JMF. They will be providing guidance on measurement and evaluation, new funding streams, strategic partnerships, delivery models, cultural needs of players and best practice delivery.

Another area is considering new regions where JMF could be delivered. Consultation is a really important process as part of how we decide where to deliver our program. We often get calls from different communities, Elders and Traditional Custodians to say that they’d love a program like JMF in their community.

This process obviously takes a lot of decision-making and community consultation which the IFA Council will be able to support. We’re very community-driven so that consultation piece is really important to understand what their needs are and how we tailor our program to suit the community, rather than only providing a generic program.

How has it been seeing the impact of JMF and the IFA on Indigenous communities around Australia?

Jamie Morriss: I’ve been here now for three years and have had the pleasure of being out to the communities that we deliver to and talking closely with community members and key stakeholders. We have an internal measurement and evaluation process in place to make sure we are achieving what the communities would like us to achieve.

In some of the communities we deliver to, before JMF began there were very limited sporting opportunities. For instance, AFL is big in Tennant Creek and many in the community are passionate about the game but that was the only sport that was played until the JMF program started. Now after three years of working with the community and consistently delivering in-school sessions, after school sessions, community events and school holiday clinics – all for free – the game has grown in popularity. Not only that, but schools are seeing an improvement in student attendance and focus, we are providing vital guidance on health & wellbeing, our coaches are role models to the young people and our young players are engaged in a positive and healthy activity.

Local employment is also a really big part of JMF. Some of the communities we deliver the program in have unemployment rates as high as 50 percent. We provide the training to become football coaches with Football Australia coaching accreditations, as well as other professional accreditations and professional development opportunities, including Indigenous Mental Health, First Aid, and Safe Food Handling courses.

When Macarthur FC first entered the A-League they committed to the development of a football academy for Indigenous youths. Unfortunately, it did not come to fruition. Do you see any potential for something similar to be led by JMF and the IFA Council?

Jamie Morriss: I do remember that initiative and I think it was a great vision. JMF has an integrated tiered delivery model.

  • Grassroots: Our grassroots program reaches 2,000+ Indigenous children with a football skills program designed to improve school attendance and achieve resilient, healthier outcomes in remote and regional Indigenous communities.
  • Advanced players: We provide opportunities for advanced players with additional training sessions and tournaments.
  • JMF Scholarships & Pathways: For those showing exceptional talent and dedication to their education we provide scholarship support. This includes school tutoring, placement with a football club plus fees, help with equipment and more.
  • Elite players: Extended support facilitating Institute of Sport, A-Leagues, Matildas, Socceroos and International Club pathways.

With guidance from the IFA Council we will consider each of these tiers, how they may be improved or expanded, all through the lens of the Aboriginal worldview and Closing the Gap targets (of which we are currently achieving proven progress in 13 of the 17 targets).

Previous ArticleNext Article

Build a home, create a culture: How do we secure the Socceroos as global competitors?

The Socceroos kicked off their World Cup campaign with a convincing 2-0 win over Turkey. It was an important win for their tournament ambitions, but also a statement about their quality on the world stage. It is time that we built a facility to ensure this quality is nurtured, not stifled.

Otherwise, we risk falling behind.

 

One of four…

Australia’s Men’s National Team currently sits as the 23rd-ranked team in the world in the official FIFA rankings. The Matildas, meanwhile, are the 15th highest-ranked women’s team.

This year is also the sixth consecutive FIFA Men’s World Cup featuring the Socceroos, confirming their position as a regular competitor in the most prestigious tournament in world football.

So why is it, despite these undeniably positive reflections of Australia’s growth in international football, that the Socceroos are still homeless?

At the 2022 FIFA Men’s World Cup in Qatar, Australia was one of four competing teams (a list featuring Denmark, Poland and Senegal) without a national base. In 2024, former Socceroos coach Graham Arnold described the team as “homeless” ahead of the World Cup qualifiers.

But four years on from the tournament’s last edition, the situations remains the same. And the world is taking notice.

 

A letter to the PM

In April this year, FIFA reportedly wrote to Australian Prime Minister, Anthony Albanese, encouraging the construction of a permanent home for football in the country.

The letter reflects concerns within the governing body that Australia, despite being so present in international football throughout the past 25 years, may fall behind the rest of the pack.

When we look at the talent in the current squad, Australia is by no means an emerging football economy. But commercial and infrastructural limitations in the landscape mean this talent is under-appreciated.

Nevertheless, it is a nation which regularly proves it can compete – and win – on the biggest stage. This we saw only a few days ago.

Which is why the players, coaches and staff representing the nation deserve a permanent facility which reflects, nurtures and inspires talent and competition. The survival of the landscape depends on it.

 

The investment question

Investment into football – from grassroots to professional levels – continues to be at the crux of national debate on how to secure football’s future in Australia.

In a conversation between Soccerscene and Melbourne-based community club, Sunbury United FC, infrastructure and facility-sharing challenges emphasised common grievances for many grassroots clubs.

The issue, therefore, is spread across the nation’s football pyramid. And prompts an uncomfortable question about future investments:

If even the Socceroos continue to share their current base, Leichhardt Oval, with various teams across rugby league and soccer, how can we ever expect clubs further down the pyramid to avoid similar fates?

The past few years, however, have fortunately seen improved investment into the women’s game in Australia – particularly embodied by the ‘Home of the Matildas’.

The result of a $101.1 million investment by the Victorian Government in collaboration with La Trobe University and the Federal Government, the facility boasts elite training features including premium FIFA-standard pitches, multiple changing rooms, a high-performance gym, a sports science lab and more.

This was a welcome and vital boost ahead of the 2023 FIFA Women’s World Cup which took place in Australia. Now, ever-increasing participation and pride are synonymous with women’s football, and the numbers confirm it.

In 2023, women and girls represented 190,746 participants across social, outdoor, fustal and registered football. In 2025, this increased to 231,435. It proves that, with the arrival of purposeful investment at the top, comes the spread of a football culture across the nation.

 

Aligning practical and cultural benefits

But what would a potential facility for the Socceroos actually look like? And what are the benefits?

When considering similar projects, we can look to both Japan and England as distinct examples of how a national base for football can unite practical, social and cultural benefits.

St George’s Park – England

Built in 2012, England’s base at St George’s Park is a masterclass in using facilities to establish a centre for industry cohesion and community impact.

As a centre of excellence, St George’s Park holds 14 outdoor pitches, a fustal arena, and hosts coaching and medical courses. It welcomes 28 teams across men’s, women’s, youth and para football, representing a place of unity and alignment for the entire football community.

Furthermore, the ‘Play Like the Pride’ program offers grassroots participants and school students the chance to experience the elite facilities for a day, showing how facilities can serve to connect young players to the world of their professional idols and foster real passion for the game.

JFA J-Village – Japan

The J-Village – beyond being a state-of-the-art football training centre – shows why a home for football can positively impact the community.

After being used as a support base for the nuclear power plant accident following the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake, the venue now holds a deeply important place in the memory of Fukishima. As a result, upon resuming full operations in 2019, the facility – and the football development within it – represented a sense of perseverance, reconstruction and unity.

And through hotels and public transportation links, the J-Village also welcomes tourists and business travellers, encouraging more people to step into the world of football in Japan.

One venue, therefore, can give rise to an essential part of a thriving football landscape: culture. A culture for participation, community outreach, and elite development.

 

Final thoughts

The focus of the summer will no doubt be how the Socceroos perform on the pitch. And with homes, offices, and public spaces brimming with enthusiastic support, the sense of national pride is irresistible.

But for all the positive sentiment currently taking hold of the nation, there will come a time when Australia’s World Cup run is over, at which point an all-important question must be asked:

How do we move forward?

We move forward by transforming buzz into an aligned vision, commitment to nurturing talent, and a desire to establish a real footballing culture across the nation.

The first step to building this culture? Building a home from which it can thrive.

If Australia Wants to Be a Football Nation, We Need to Stop Scheduling Against the Socceroos

Jake Stringer isn’t a football analyst, a broadcaster or a football administrator.

Yet this week, he articulated a frustration many Australian football fans have felt for decades.

Following Australia’s opening match at the FIFA World Cup, the former AFL star labelled it a “disgrace” that AFL fixtures were scheduled head-to-head with the Socceroos, questioning why Australian sport would compete with one of the country’s most important sporting events rather than embrace it.

Whether you agree with Stringer or not, his comments touch on a much larger issue.

For all the discussion about football’s growth in Australia, the game still struggles to receive the national recognition afforded to comparable moments in other sports.

The Socceroos are not simply another national team.

They are Australia’s most globally relevant sporting side.

The argument that football remains a niche sport in Australia becomes increasingly difficult to sustain when the Socceroos take the field.

Their opening World Cup victory over Türkiye attracted a total television audience of 4.78 million Australians, with an average audience exceeding three million across SBS and SBS On Demand. SBS confirmed it was the third most-watched free-to-air event of 2026, while World Cup coverage had already reached more than eight million Australians during the tournament.

These are not football numbers.

They are national event numbers.

The Socceroos’ 2-0 victory, powered by goals from Nestory Irankunda and Connor Metcalfe, generated nationwide interest that extended far beyond football’s traditional supporter base. It was one of those increasingly rare sporting occasions capable of capturing the attention of millions of Australians simultaneously.

When an event is attracting audiences measured in the millions and commanding national attention, it ceases to be simply a football fixture. It becomes a moment of national significance.

Now the question is why Australian sport still struggles to treat one of its most globally relevant teams as a national asset rather than a competitor.

The argument from competing codes is usually straightforward: schedules are set years in advance, broadcasters have obligations, and domestic competitions cannot simply stop every time the Socceroos play.

That is true.

But there is a significant difference between maintaining a schedule and actively competing against a national moment.

Other sporting nations understand this distinction.

When major national teams compete on the world’s biggest stage, rival sports often find ways to accommodate, promote or at the very least avoid directly undermining the occasion. Not because they are required to, but because there is an understanding that national representation transcends code wars.

In the United States, the NBA adjusted its 2026 Finals schedule to avoid a direct clash with the USMNT’s opening FIFA World Cup match against Paraguay. It was not a charitable act towards football, but a recognition that a home World Cup creates a national sporting moment too significant to ignore.

That is the point Australia still struggles to grasp.

When the Socceroos play on the world stage, it should not be treated as just another football broadcast competing for space. It should be viewed as a national event.

One that rival codes can acknowledge without diminishing themselves.

 

Missed opportunities

The irony of the current approach is that everyone loses.

Football loses potential viewers and momentum.

Competing codes lose the opportunity to align themselves with a rare moment of national unity.

Most importantly, Australian sport misses the chance to present itself as a collective ecosystem rather than a collection of competing tribes.

This is particularly significant as Australia prepares for one of the most important decades in its sporting history.

Australia’s football rise

The Socceroos have now qualified for six consecutive FIFA World Cups and continue to build on the momentum generated by their remarkable run in Qatar. Under Tony Popovic, expectations are growing that Australia can once again challenge on the world stage.

At the same time, football participation continues to rise nationally, women’s football is experiencing unprecedented growth, and Australia is positioning itself as a major player in the global game.

Yet moments that should be celebrated nationally still feel like they require justification.

Perhaps that is why Stringer’s comments resonated.

They did not come from a football insider defending his own code.

They came from someone outside the game looking in and questioning why Australia would choose competition over collaboration when the Socceroos are representing the nation.

The real conversation is not whether one AFL round should move or whether broadcasters should alter their programming.

The question is much bigger.

If we genuinely believe football has a place at the centre of Australia’s sporting landscape, then our biggest football moments should be treated as national sporting occasions—not just football occasions.

Until that happens, Australian football will continue fighting a battle that most football nations settled long ago.

Most Popular Topics

Editor Picks

Send this to a friend