Made in Holland- the Patrick Zwaanswijk Way

Patrick Zwaanswijk paraded his talents in professional football as a player with Ajax Juniors, Utrecht FC, Oita Trinita, NAC Breda and Central Coast Mariners for nearly 20 years and is now trying to make an impact on Australian football in the coaching ranks.

In his time with the Mariners, he was one of the outstanding central defenders in the A- League and was selected in the A- League Team of the season in his maiden season, 2010/11.

All  those years in the Eredivisie with Utrecht and NAC Breda enabled him to rub shoulders with opponents like Zlatan Ibrahimovic and Luis Suarez in European competition while playing with stars like Dirk Kuyt and Richard Witschge.

He has held a number of coaching jobs since retiring from professional football at the Mariners in 2013 and at the moment  is overseeing youth development at Hills United while contemplating his future in Australian football.

In this interview with Roger Sleeman, Patrick  Zwaanswijk reflects on his playing career and espouses his views on youth development and the pathway of Australian football.

 

ROGER SLEEMAN

What was your background in Dutch football?

PATRICK ZWAANSWIJK

I was born into a football family in the Amsterdam suburb of Haarlem where the game is a way of life.

At the age of 14, I played in an inter- regional competition against Ajax and Feyenoord and eventually made the Ajax u/18 team which was influenced by Johan Cruyff and Louis Van Gaal who was the head coach of the club.

I played in the youth team from 1995-98  and in this time we won the Champions League in 1995 and were runners up in 1996.

After Van Gaal left for Barcelona in 1997, Morton Olsen came to Ajax and brought in a lot of foreign players which made it very hard for the youth team players to graduate to the senior squad.

Eventually, I joined Utrecht at the age of 22 where I spent five and a half  seasons and played in two Dutch Cup Finals.

ROGER SLEEMAN

While you were at Utrecht, Bobby Robson came to see you play with the intention of signing you for Newcastle United.

Can you explain the background to this event?

PATRICK ZWAANSWIJK

In 2002, one of my teammates at Utrecht, David Mendez Da Silva, was being looked at by an agent in a game against Sparta Rotterdam and I played really well that day. A scout came to view me again in an away game and Bobby Robson followed .

Subsequently, Robson made an offer to buy me but Han Berger refused the offer.

At the time, we had Dirk Kuyt and some Belgian internationals in the squad , had just won the Dutch Cup, were 5th in the League but I was told they wanted to keep the squad intact.

Dirk Kuyt moved on and Berger went to Japan to manage OitaTrinta who also had Richard Witschge in the team.

I followed Berger to Japan.

ROGER SLEEMAN

After one season in Japan, you returned to Holland to play with Ante Milic’s former club, NAC Breda.

Can you relate that experience?

PATRICK ZWAANSWIJK

I played at Breda in the middle of the defence with Rob Penders and we became known as “the Twin Towers “.

The club had quality players and we always finished in the top 6-7 in the Eredivisie as well as competing in the Champions League and Europa League competitions.

However, at the age of 35, I  realised the club was looking for younger players so my future was uncertain.

ROGER SLEEMAN

What were the circumstances which led to your signing by Central Coast Mariners in 2010?

PATRICK ZWAANSWIJK

Graham Arnold was told about me by a few former players he knew from Breda so he made me an offer which would give me an opportunity to play in a new country for the rest of my career.

The decision paid off because we made the A-League grand final in the 2010/11 season, only to lose the match to Brisbane Roar , due to that contentious decision made in favour of Besart Berisha.

However, I received a great honor when I was selected in the A-League team of the year.

In the 2011/12 season we won the Premier’s Plate but were defeated in the semi-final , and in 2012/13 we were neck and neck for the season with the Wanderers before they won the Premier’s Plate.

We won in the grand final and I managed to score a goal which meant at the age  of 37, I decided to leave the game at a high point.

ROGER SLEEMAN

How did you rate the A-League when you were playing in it?

PATRICK ZWAANSWIJK

It was physical ,and at the Mariners, the players had great mentality and a willingness to work hard.

I was fortunate to be at the Mariners with the Golden Generation and Arnold wanted me to be their leader.

Players of the calibre of Ryan, Sainsbury, Wilkinson, Rogic, Duke , Ibini, Simon and Amini were a pleasure to play with and most of them progressed to great heights in their careers which vindicated the standard of the A-League at the time.

ROGER SLEEMAN

How do you compare youth development in Australia with that of Holland?

PATRICK ZWAANSWIJK

Critically, in Holland it’s free.

Technically, young Australian players are as capable as their Dutch counterparts .

However,  from a total development standpoint, they are worlds apart.

In Australia there is a set program and the players aren’t prepared physically, tactically and for superior decision making whilst in Holland players are taught these facets of the game at an early stage in their development.

There is definitely a structural problem here with too many conflicting philosophies and the absence of an effective talent scout system ,also means the best players don’t always come through the system.

ROGER SLEEMAN

You were involved with the Olyroos and the u/19’s.

How did you rate these players?

PATRICK ZWAANSWIJK

I was assistant coach under Gary Van Egmond for the u/19’s and up to three months before the Olympics.

Players like Metcalfe, Glover , Tilio,  Atkinson and Bacchus were still in development but performed well in Japan.

Atkinson’s move to Hearts was positive as he is in a country where there is no language barrier and Metcalfe’s imminent move to St Pauli will bear fruit when the club is promoted to the Bundesliga.

For these young players, they are leaving a country where football is number five compared to European countries where the sport is number one which can only contribute to their success.

ROGER SLEEMAN

You were employed by Wanderers as an assistant coach in September, 2020.

What was your experience of that?

PATRICK ZWAANSWIJK

I was assistant coach to Jean- Paul de Marigny but we never coached together because three weeks into the season , his services were terminated.

When Carl Robinson and Kenny Miller were appointed as the head coaches, I formed a good working relationship with them.

I took over the role of A- League youth coach and we finished second in the League.

We played the same formation as the first team and nine of the players from the youth pool gained contracts on scholarships. Also, I played an important role in development and mentoring.

However, CEO, John Tsatsimas, rang me at the completion of my contract to advise my contract wouldn’t be renewed due to Covid.

This was even after Carl Robinson had commented I was the best coach out of Labinot Haliti, Kenny Miller and myself.

ROGER SLEEMAN

Why are the Wanderers experiencing such turbulent times?

PATRICK ZWAANSWIJK

The truth is, they won’t return to greatness until they make major changes and the recent publicity surrounding the replacement of Mark Rudan ,when he was caretaker coach, by Ufuk Talay was an example of the uncertainty existing.

The appointment of Rudan to a full time position will hopefully be a positive.

ROGER SLEEMAN

Who are the people in Australian football you have been most impressed with?

PATRICK ZWAANSWIJK

I’ve always held the highest respect for Graham Arnold, especially at the Mariners and when he was assistant to Guus Hiddink and Pim Verbeek for World Cups.

The former F.A. Technical Director, Rob Sherman  ,who I did my A-Licence under was a man who was in the game for the right reasons but unfortunately was critical of the F.A. setup and didn’t think he could implement his ideas.

However, the man I believe should be centre stage in Australian football is the game’s most decorated player, Craig Johnston.

He loves Australia and is so passionate about youth development.

Craig has been accepted all around the world by people like Cruyff and Klinsmann for his training methods and skills development , yet Australia still hasn’t allowed him to influence the game in a profound way.

Previous ArticleNext Article

South Melbourne’s A-League dream is still a bridge too far

The A-League has just lost a Victorian club. The death of Western United and the suspension of its license by the Australian Professional Leagues (APL) on August 10th was inevitable. The club says it wants to rebuild and eventually return to the competition. That is unlikely to happen considering the search for new owners has to begin.

But one day after the announcement from Western United, South Melbourne stepped forward. The four-time NSL winners announced their intention to begin formal discussions with the APL about joining the A-Leagues. They believe the timing is right. Their argument is understandable. Their football credentials and history are stronger than most A-League teams.

But there is a problem. South Melbourne may have the history. It may have the supporters. It may even have one of the most attractive potential derbies in Australian football. But that does not mean it will get an A-League licence.

In fact, the more realistic prediction from my perspective is that South Melbourne will once again be told no.

South Melbourne has never been better placed

There is plenty to like about South Melbourne’s position. The club is not simply relying on its history. South Melbourne returned to national competition through the inaugural Australian Championship in 2025. It did not merely participate. South Melbourne won it. The club defeated Marconi Stallions 2-0 in the final to become the competition’s first champion.

That achievement matters. The Australian Championship was created to bridge state-based football and the professional game. Whilst it is seen as a second tier, there is no promotion and relegation with the A-League. But it has also continued to perform on the national stage. In the 2026 Australia Cup, which South Melbourne qualified for, they reached the final rounds and then produced one of the biggest results of the tournament.

Adelaide United came to Lakeside Stadium. South Melbourne won 2-1. Adelaide had won the Australia Cup three times. South knocked them out in front of its own supporters. They’re now into the quarter-finals of the 2026 Australia Cup.

South Melbourne celebrating the Australian Championship Image Credits: South Melbourne FC

The club also has a much bigger story to tell than its recent results. Alongside its four NSL victories, the club also won the 1999 Oceania Club Championship and represented Oceania at the 2000 FIFA Club World Championship. The club has a dedicated supporter base and the history to deserve a place.

The club says its Oceania Professional League participation has helped make it Australia’s 13th professional football club. It has more than 150 businesses supporting it in 2026 and a long-term arrangement at Lakeside Stadium, in the heart of South Melbourne.

On the football side, it wants to continue competing in the NPL, Australian Championship and Oceania competition even if it enters the A-Leagues. It also has lofty ambitions to introduce an A-League women’s side.

On paper, it is difficult to argue that South Melbourne is not ready. The problem is that readiness and admission are two different things.

Third time’s the charm?

South Melbourne’s current push is not new. It has been here before. The club was pursuing an A-League return almost immediately after the NSL disappeared. In 2007, South announced its interest in becoming the second Victorian A-League club.

Then came the 2008-09 process. South Melbourne backed the Southern Cross bid for the second Victorian licence. The club proposed a new team based around the redevelopment of Bob Jane Stadium and involvement from the broader Victorian football community.

It lost. The Melbourne Heart bid won the race and eventually became Melbourne City. That was South Melbourne’s first major warning. Its football heritage was not enough. Its second major attempt came almost a decade later.

The 2017-18 expansion process produced the most serious South Melbourne bid yet. South made the shortlist for an expanded A-League licence. It ultimately lost to Western United. Bill Papastergiadis has since explained that he did not genuinely expect South Melbourne to win in 2018, despite believing strongly that the club belonged in the A-League. He also reflected on the barriers facing a traditional club trying to enter the existing Victorian professional football ecosystem.

That is important context for today’s bid. South Melbourne is not entering negotiations without understanding how difficult the politics and economics of the Victorian football market can be. The club has tried the direct route twice. Neither time worked.

The Western United lesson

This is where the current situation becomes complicated. In isolation, adding South Melbourne would be fantastic for the A-League. Imagine South Melbourne against Melbourne Victory. The atmosphere would be enormous.

There is a genuine football rivalry waiting to happen. South itself points to the potential for ready-made derbies and commercial interest. But the argument that Melbourne should simply have three A-League clubs because Melbourne is a huge city ignores what has just happened to Western United.

Western United was supposed to represent Melbourne’s rapidly growing west. Its original vision centred on a major project in Geelong. The club eventually moved into Ironbark Fields in Tarneit in 2024.

Yet the geographic separation never became as clear as the original concept suggested. Western United was not a Geelong club. It was not a regional Victorian club in the traditional sense. It was a western Melbourne club based and that matters.

The A-League already has Melbourne City and Melbourne Victory. Adding South Melbourne would give the competition three clubs operating within the same metropolitan football market. It is not necessarily brilliant for the business model, which has already lost a club operating on the outskirts of Melbourne.

The NSL offers an interesting historical comparison. The Falcons provide an even more striking Victorian example. They became the first and only regional Victorian club to play in the NSL, reaching the finals in 1996. The distinction is important.

A national competition can expand its footprint by adding genuinely new markets. That is different from adding another club inside an existing Melbourne metropolitan market. That was what was envisioned for Western United, and it failed quickly.

Will the APL see South Melbourne as a safe investment? Despite the fact they’re a well-established club, I’d argue the answer is no.

Promotion and relegation is the only realistic route

There is one scenario where South Melbourne could eventually force its way into the A-League, and that’s the great missing piece of Australian football. Promotion and relegation. South Melbourne would not need somebody to decide that Melbourne suddenly has room for another licence. It would simply need to earn it.

They would have done just that in 2025, winning the Australian Championship if the football pyramid was open. Football Australia originally designed the National Second Tier with the possibility of promotion and relegation being considered once the competition matured.

The format connects NPL clubs and established foundation clubs with national competition. It does not provide a sporting pathway into the A-League. South Melbourne can win the Australian Championship, NSL and Australia Cup but none of those achievements automatically produce an A-League licence.

South Melbourne in the Oceania Championship Image Credits: Oceania Championship

Opening the pyramid is far more complicated than simply announcing promotion and relegation. Australia’s football calendar is fragmented. The A-League operates primarily through the summer months. The NPL operates through the winter and early spring. For the 2026-27 season, the A-League Men runs from October to June, while the NPL begins in February and finishes in September.

That creates an enormous structural problem for a fully connected pyramid. The clubs below the A-League would need to operate at a level capable of supporting professional football. If the A-League aligned with the NPL and the lower pyramid, it would compete in a football calendar that already has to coexist with Australia’s other major winter sports. That is a difficult feat against bigger leagues such as the AFL and NRL.

Beyond that, clubs lower down would need travel budgets and to survive commercially would take real sacrifice from all parties to make that work. The A-League’s existing clubs also have something to lose. They have invested heavily in their licences and their businesses.

Historically, A-League licences were extended through to 2034, while those licence arrangements have included provisions allowing promotion and relegation to be introduced. But the existing clubs will do everything in their power to block it. Promotion and relegation removes certainty. An A-League club can finish last in the current system with no threat to their place. Under relegation, its place is no longer guaranteed.

That is a major commercial change for clubs that have invested in securing their position in the competition. It is therefore difficult to imagine the A-League opening the door. The A-League’s licensing system gives the competition enormous control over who enters, and for South Melbourne historically they’ve been left out in the cold.

South Melbourne deserves the conversation.

The frustrating part is South Melbourne has probably never had a stronger argument. It has history, supporters, infrastructure, commercial support and most importantly, ambition. Beating A-League clubs in national competition proves the capability is there.

It deserves to be in the conversation. But being in the conversation is not the same as being selected. The Western United experience should be a warning. If the A-League could not make the Western United project work, it is difficult to see why it would suddenly decide that another Melbourne club is the answer.

South Melbourne may be the better football story. It may even be the better football club. But the A-League is not simply selecting the best football story.

It is selecting a professional competition, and until Australia embraces a genuine promotion and relegation system, South Melbourne’s path back to the top flight will remain dependent on someone handing it a licence.

That is the part of the dream that looks unrealistic. South Melbourne can keep knocking and it should. They always say third time’s the charm. But unless the pyramid is opened, I expect the door to remain closed.

Manchester City’s financial pressure grows as Rodri heads to Barcelona

Manchester City are under growing financial pressure as Rodri heads to Barcelona in a $125 million (76.5 million euros) deal.

Barcelona will pay $98 million (60 million euros) up front. The deal also includes performance-based bonuses that could take the total package to $125 million.

The move gives City a major financial boost at a time when the club continues to face uncertainty surrounding its 115 Premier League charges.

Financial pressure grows at City

Manchester City have spent heavily in recent years, with $1.3 billion (690 million pounds) spent on new players since being charged by the Premier League. The club continue to deny all 115 charges, but the case could still have major financial consequences.

The case covers alleged breaches involving financial information, player and manager payments, UEFA rules, profit and sustainability rules and cooperation with investigations.

Rodri’s sale could now provide City with valuable financial flexibility. The club enter the new season with a rebuilt squad and a new manager after the departure of Pep Guardiola, while the outcome of the Premier League case remains unknown.

A seven-year City career ends

Rodri joined Manchester City from Atlético Madrid in 2019 and quickly became the centre of City’s midfield. The 30-year-old made 298 appearances for the club. He won four Premier League titles, the Champions League and several domestic trophies.

He also scored the winning goal in City’s 2023 Champions League final victory. His individual honours are just as impressive; Rodri won the Ballon d’Or in 2024. Now, after seven hugely successful seasons, he is heading home.

His departure marks the end of one of the most successful periods in City’s history. But it also comes at a time when the club must carefully manage its finances while waiting for the outcome of the Premier League case.

The impact on performance

For City, the $125 million deal continues a small exodus. The club have continued to recruit heavily while waiting for a verdict on the Premier League’s investigation that could have major consequences.

Rodri leaves Manchester as a Ballon d’Or winner, a Champions League winner and one of the defining midfielders of his generation. Now City are without the captain and long time manager.

His departure signals the end of an era while providing a significant injection of money at a time when financial pressure and uncertainty continue to surround the club.

Most Popular Topics

Editor Picks

Send this to a friend