Perhaps the best thing James Johnson can do for Australian football is leave it alone

Much hope has surrounded Football Federation Australia’s decision to appoint one of our own to its helm. Intelligent, well connected, young and with actual experience in and around the game at the highest level, James Johnson ticks all the boxes when it comes to the type of person many believe should be shuffling the deck chairs and mapping the course for the medium term future.

With no doubt scores of meetings to attend, stakeholders to acquaint and new relationships to be formed, Johnson has been and will continue to be, a very busy man. Having outlined a broad vision of fundamental issues that he sees as at the top of the FFA to-do list, Johnson will now set about forging trusting relationships with those capable of supporting and assisting in the implementation of his plans.

A national second division is potentially the most burning issue and to many the most vital. Some suggest an aggressive approach, brisk establishment and an ironing out of issues on the run, as the competition begins to take shape. Those feeling that approach is the right course are somewhat misguided in their view that an established second tier would automatically provide something of a magic elixir for the domestic game.

More prudent would be Johnson overseeing a measured approach to what could be the most significant change in Australian football for decades. The risk adverse leadership that the game has endured since the A-League was established 15 years ago does need to be energised, yet Johnson’s significant experience will not see him throw the game into the fire without a well thought out plan and a strategical approach that stands a fighting chance of success.

Whatever the final timeline does prove to be, the game is about to experience a significant change when the much awaited second tier is established. It will be a move with the potential to reconnect the fractures that separate those involved and gripped by the A-League model and others embracing Australia’s footballing past in the form of their community clubs and NPL competitions.

That chasm has been a fundamental road block to growth in Australia, with a significant portion of the football loving public remaining sceptical of the franchise model on which the A-League was based. Moreover, younger fans without ties to some of Australia’s oldest, traditional and culturally rich clubs struggle to appreciate that history, nor value its importance in terms of potentially bringing thousands of supporters back to a fully functioning, multi-leagued national competition.

The change that is coming will be welcomed, however, symptomatic of the excessive tinkering and fiddling with the game that has taken place since the inception of the National Soccer League competition in 1977.

1984 saw the adoption of a conference system that lasted just two seasons and resulted in many clubs being demoted back to local competitions. In 1989, the long argued case for summer football came to pass as the competition shifted its season to the warmer months. Around the same time, the rather cringe worthy concept of making football ‘mainstream’ took over the thinking of those at the helm.

After decades of clubs building stable communities, essentially based on migrants supporting each other in the search for a sense of belonging, ethnically based club names and logos were forcibly altered. Ethinic flags became forbidden in a rather flawed attempt by David Hill and his board to cleanse the game of its migrant past. It was an odd move considering the profile of the average NSL fan.

The new approach was parlayed into the creation of a host of clubs such as Parramatta Power, Collingwood and Carlton, all obvious attempts to draw in people from both NRL and AFL markets. It was an unmitigated disaster.

Teams battled financially, broadcasting rights delivered little return and sponsorship dwindled. The NSL was dead by 2004, thanks mainly to rather poor decisions and a failure to appreciate the base from which the Australian game had grown.

Along the way, competition changes were also constant. You name it, Australian football tried it. The traditional first past the post style morphed into grand finals, two-legged grand finals, five team finals’ series, six team finals’ series and even points incentives for matches won by larger margins.

At one point, drawn matches resulted in a penalty shootout to determine the destination of the third point.

At that juncture, reinvention seemed the only way forward and thus the A-League was born. Ironically, the future was to be based on wholesale and sweeping changes, required after years of exactly that.

The game has not been left alone for decades, nor been allowed to find its own unique identity thanks to an array of administrators who thought they knew better.

Whilst everyone acknowledges the need for growth and change as Johnson moves into the top job, it might be prudent to remind ourselves of that fact.

Previous ArticleNext Article

Manchester City must pay the ultimate price for financial cheating

Manchester City’s financial scandal has reached boiling point. On the 29th of September, an independent commission found City guilty of all charges relating to serious breaches of the league’s financial rules across nine seasons, from 2009/10 to 2017/18. The commission also upheld three of four charges concerning the club’s failure to cooperate with the Premier League investigation.

The Premier League says City used sham commercial arrangements and disguised owner funding to inflate revenue and reduce costs by more than $1.7 billion (£900 million). Abu Dhabi United Group funded $1.58 billion (£830.69 million) that appeared in City’s accounts as sponsorship money from Abu Dhabi companies. The commission concluded that City’s accounts concealed the true financial position from auditors and regulators.

The 115 charges cover inaccurate financial information, player and manager payments, financial rules and the investigation itself. City has lodged its appeal against the guilty verdict, but for such a serious sporting scandal, attention has already turned to the potential punishments. In a Premier League era where foreign investment is king and revenues have skyrocketed, we should be asking questions. How did Manchester City get away with this for so long, and how can the punishment act as a deterrent to keep the reputation of football’s biggest league intact?

The hack that exposed the story

The most uncomfortable part of this saga is how the authorities discovered it and how most likely City never would have been exposed. In 2018, German publication Der Spiegel published leaked internal City emails and documents obtained through Football Leaks. Rui Pinto, the Portuguese hacker behind Football Leaks, supplied material that alleged City had disguised owner investment as sponsorship revenue and manipulated arrangements to satisfy financial regulations.

The Premier League investigation began in December 2018. City were formally charged in February 2023, after a four-year investigation, and the hearing finally began in September 2024. That timeline is nothing short of extraordinary; eight years between the leaks being exposed and charges being brought to Manchester City does significant sporting damage.

Man City won eight major titles during the alleged period, including three Premier League titles. Recalling titles in any sport leaves a sour taste in any sports fan’s mouth. The fans of opposing sides given titles feel robbed of the special moment, and Manchester City fans could feel rightfully deceived. But it goes beyond even this as we look at who Manchester City signed during those seasons. Players such as Ilkay Gundogan and Kevin De Bruyne played vital roles in City’s later titles beyond the 2017/2018 season. Would they have joined if this had been uncovered earlier? It’s impossible to say, but it shows how City’s early investment from 2009/10 still contributed to their titles in the 2020’s.

The Premier League’s credibility

That delay is not just embarrassing for City; it damages the Premier League. The league is the most competitive and commercially powerful domestic competition in football. Its rules are supposed to create a framework in which clubs compete on sporting merit while remaining financially sustainable. If a club can allegedly distort its accounts by hundreds of millions of dollars and the process takes years to reach a verdict, despite City’s potential obstruction, every other club has a reason to question whether the system works.

The irony is obvious: if Football Leaks hadn’t shared what they found on Manchester City through its hack, the scheme never would have been uncovered. If financial rules were designed to stop clubs gaining an unfair competitive advantage, then the Premier League may need to change how it investigates how its clubs’ finances are being managed. If anything should be gained from this, it may be that financial regulation needs to be improved as the Premier League and its clubs spend billions.

As for Manchester City, punishment cannot simply be a fine that becomes another operating cost.

Relegation is the only serious answer

If the verdict survives the appeal, Manchester City should be removed from the Premier League and those three aforementioned league titles removed. A fine would be inadequate and, depending on what points deduction City got, would punish the club in one season while leaving the historical record largely intact. Nottingham Forest received a four point deduction for a charge of Profitability and Sustainability rules in 2023-2024. City’s 114 charges will see much greater punishment then that.

Even if City are relegated they would almost be guranteed to be promoted the next season so even that feels like a slap on the wrist. Despite their investment during the nine seasons being questioned their five titles subsequent to that period will be expected to remain in their hands. My solution is to relegate City to the Championship without the potential of promotion for three seasons, one for each title won during that time.

City fans will call that harsh but their is strong reason to come down hard and that’s because this is bigger than Manchester City. Foreign ownership has brought huge investment into English football, but investment cannot mean exemption from the rules. Owners, executives and clubs must know that the Premier League’s financial regulations carry consequences that cannot be negotiated away.

The league has a choice. It can impose a manageable punishment and move on, or it can demonstrate that competitive integrity matters more than the commercial power of its biggest clubs. If City’s appeal fails, the answer should be clear: relegation, a reckoning over the titles and a message to every owner that the Premier League’s rules are not optional.

Australian referee strike ends ahead of new A-League season

Australia’s referee crisis is over as Football Australia (FA), the Australian Professional Leagues (APL) and the Professional Football Referees Association (PFRA) have reached an agreement ahead of the 2026/27 domestic season.

The deal ends industrial action that began on September 4th. Nearly 100 of Australia’s top referees had refused appointments during the dispute. The agreement provides immediate certainty for officials. It also clears the way for Australia’s top referees to return for the Australia Cup Final this week and the opening rounds of the A-League Men and Women competitions.

Under the new framework, referees will be contracted and employed exclusively by Football Australia. The APL will cover the cost of referees appointed to A-League matches. The arrangement runs through the end of the 2026/27 season. The three organisations will continue discussions on a longer-term structure for elite refereeing in Australia.

The agreement resolves the central dispute between the parties. Football Australia had proposed shifting responsibility for A-League referees to the APL. The referees opposed the move. They raised concerns about employment certainty. They also questioned the independence of referees working under a league controlled by the clubs they officiate.

The dispute had already disrupted Australian football. Singaporean officials were brought in for the Australia Cup semi-final between Sydney FC and Melbourne Victory. Rookie Australian officials also took charge of another Cup fixture during the strike. The crisis therefore moved beyond a contractual disagreement. It affected the delivery of major matches.

The A-League Men season begins on October 16 with the Sydney derby at Allianz Stadium and the A-League Women season will also begin in October. The agreement solves the immediate problem. It does not end the wider debate over refereeing in Australian football.

FA, the APL and the PFRA must now build a sustainable model for elite officials. The strike exposed uncertainty around contracts, funding and governance. Those issues cannot return every time a new season approaches. Australian football can moves forward, but this is an issue that should be reviewed for the sustainability of Australian referees.

Most Popular Topics

Editor Picks

Send this to a friend