Psychologist Christopher Shen: How to mentally prepare for a Grand Final

We are building up to what should be a fantastic A-League Men Grand Final, as Central Coast Mariners and Melbourne Victory take centre stage in Gosford, vying for the 2023/24 title.

It’s an exciting but also nervous time for the players as they will be eager to do well and lift the trophy – after another thrilling A-Leagues season comes to an end,

In this article, I outline the emotions a player will feel, and how to develop positive habits, set up for success, and manage external factors.

What happens when someone is nervous and managing the range of emotions:

There will be a wide variety of emotions experienced by players – ranging from anxiety, worry, concern, and distress, all the way to the other end of the ‘stress spectrum’ involving eustress – which is the positive stress that’s the butterflies in the stomach and the slight nervous activation that makes us excited and helps us play well.

In these circumstances, it’s very helpful for individuals to have an activity or habit that can create calm and relaxation for them, and an activity I recommend is mindfulness meditation, with activities such as yoga practices or deep breathing exercises.

I absolutely endorse players establishing helpful habits and regimes that help evoke a set of emotions and thoughts to play at their best.

My caveat is for that habit not to be burdensome and unhelpful – some superstitions can actually be quite unhelpful. An interesting example is watching tennis champion Rafael Nadal with his self-admitted obsessive compulsions to arrange his belongings between games, or the pulling of his shorts between points.

The dilemma of battling injury and not being 100% fit:

There’s a lot of circumstances that can be quite uncertain and chaotic for players.

When thinking about players who are substitutes, they may be endeavouring to manage their trepidation and anxiety about whether they will get chosen in the starting line-up.

It’s really helpful for those players to have a habit that can create positivity and disrupt chaotic thinking – which positive psychology skills of gratitude and savouring.

Regular starting players who are nearing the end of their career may be more prone to anxiety and worrisome thoughts. These players may be contemplating retirement, compared to the freedom of youth where they may think and feel they are indestructible.

Another aspect of this may be players who have a looming trial with an international team, where they are understandably concerned about having the opportunity to successfully perform while being scouted, and wanting to play as best as possible.

These thoughts and emotions have a big influence before a championship game.

How teams can build a dynasty rather than a one-off Grand Final win:

Sustained success in team sports is historically a combination of high-performing talent, and strong high-performance programs – including strength and conditioning, rehabilitation, nutrition, psychology, player wellbeing and development, and coaching.

Scientific research demonstrates it is helpful to create and enshrine a culture of agreed team behaviours and practices that lead towards good habits which influence sustained successful team performance.

Teams who enjoy sustained success season after season often have a culture where players take responsibility for their own preparation and are diligent in-between seasons to stay professional in the off-season through their conditioning and behaviours. They are also responsible for their diet, rehabilitation, craft and skill development, and rest.

It’s also important for all the players to demand and reinforce adherence to good standards of playing, performance, training, rehabilitation, and positive and respectful behaviour towards all players, coaches, and officials in the squad – including those in development teams.

Managing social media and unwanted comments or posts:

I recommend that teams and individuals have helpful ways of being able to manoeuvre their way through the digital platforms.

Players, coaches, and officials should receive instruction and training in when and how to access and use social media. There will be times immediately after a loss or when out of the team due to selction, injury ,or illness where accessing social media may be deleterious to their mood and thinking.

To block out the negative noise completely is not sustainable in 2024, so it’s about how to helpfully and succeffully navigate around the digital platforms and make it work in a positive way.

This can extend towards appearances which are scrutinised by the public and reported in media – you only have to look at Kansas City Chiefs kicker Harrison Butker who recently gave a commencement speech where his negative and harmful comments on LGBTIQA+ communities and women’s careers went against the respectful messaging presented by the NFL and Kansas City Chiefs.

This is why media training is so important, to protect the reputation of not only the player but also the team and league they represent.

Conclusion:

Achieving great success in the A-Leagues is not only within the physical battle, but it is also about how the mind works mentally.

Developing strong positive habits and sticking to them is an integral part of elite athlete preparation, extending to how they present themselves in front of media or handling social platforms.

I wish every success to the players, coaches, officials, and fans of both teams in this week’s A-League Men’s Grand Final.

www.christophershen.com.au

Previous ArticleNext Article

Bordeaux face uncertain future after American investor withdrawal

Girondins de Bordeaux face their biggest crisis yet after their exclusion from France’s national competitions was upheld and proposed investor Park Bench walked away from a takeover. The club is on the brink of liquidation after poor financial management and failed ownership takeovers. The Paris Administrative Court rejected Bordeaux’s appeal in August. The court backed the decision that prevents the club from playing in national competitions for the 2026-27 season. Bordeaux will therefore this season remain in Régional 1, the sixth tier of French football.

The ruling followed a financial dispute with French football’s financial regulator, the DNCG. Bordeaux had presented additional financial guarantees after its previous hearing. The court ruled that those commitments could not be considered as part of that procedure.

The decision has now had a major impact on the club’s ownership plans. Park Bench, the US investment group working with Sparta Capital, has withdrawn from its proposed takeover. The group said its offer depended on Bordeaux remaining in the national championships. With that condition no longer possible, Park Bench decided not to proceed.

The withdrawal leaves Bordeaux in a difficult position. The club had hoped new investment would provide financial stability and help rebuild its sporting operation. Instead, the failure of the takeover leaves the future of the six-time French champions uncertain. Bordeaux has already endured several years of financial problems. The club lost its professional status in 2024 after bankruptcy proceedings and a previous administrative relegation. It then rebuilt its senior team in the second and third tiers of French football.

The latest exclusion represents another major setback. Bordeaux now needs to find a way to keep the club operating outside the national leagues. That means securing funding, meeting its financial obligations and establishing a sustainable ownership structure. The threat of judicial liquidation now hangs over the club.

In a statement issued in late August, Bordeaux said it would explore every remaining legal option after the administrative court ruling. But with Park Bench no longer backing the proposed takeover, the club has fewer options available.

The next priority will be survival. Bordeaux must find new financial backing or another solution to protect the club from liquidation. For one of France’s most historic and successful clubs, the immediate target is no longer a return to Ligue 1. It is simply making sure there is a club left to climb back.

Australia football needs to fix its football governance before it can fix its referees

The clearest image yet of Australian football’s refereeing crisis arrived on Wednesday night as Sydney FC and Melbourne Victory met in an Australia Cup semi-final at Jubilee Stadium.

A first ever Big Blue in the competition – and towards it’s pointy end – should have been a showcase event for Australian football but instead, the referees were in the spotlight. Not because of the quality of their officiating, but because of the dire situation the game finds itself in and it’s present need to resort to international imports.


Four Singaporean referees were in charge of the fixture, which Victory won 2-0. Australian referees had refused appointments because of their ongoing dispute with Football Australia. The issue is no longer theoretical. Australian referees are not simply threatening industrial action – their absence has already changed how major matches are delivered. That is a governance failure on the part of Football Australia and the Australian Professional League.

What are the referees fighting for?

Around 90 elite Australian match officials are currently without contracts. That includes referees, assistant referees, fourth officials and video match officials working across the A-Leagues and Australia’s national competitions. The previous contracts expired last month. Some officials are also waiting for outstanding payments from A-League trial matches.

The Professional Football Referees Association (PFRA) has set three main requirements:

  • It wants the existing contracts extended until June 30, 2027, or until a new agreement or independent refereeing structure is established. 
  • It wants all outstanding match fees and expenses paid.
  • It wants a professional refereeing structure that does not place elite officials directly under the APL, which is controlled by the clubs they officiate. A new central structure is what the referees are demanding and should get.

Evgeny Vizelman, chairman of the PFRA, believes that whilst the strike action is extreme, it is necessary to protect Australian referees.

“We do not take the decision to stop officiating matches lightly,” Vizelman told Sydney Morning Herald last week.

“Our referees are being asked to perform in one of the most scrutinised roles in Australian sport without basic certainty around their employment and, in some cases, without even being paid for work already completed. That is not acceptable.”

Football Australia and the APL have been working towards a new structure, but one in which the two organisations contract separately for Australia Cup and A-League matches. The referees believe that is the wrong model.

Their concern is simple: The APL is 67.7% owned by the A-League Club Unitholders. Essentially, the clubs are appointing their own referees. That creates a perceived conflict.

If the referees sit under Football Australia as a regulator, it ensures there is no conflict of interest and that A-League clubs have no opportunity to influence the referees they may be appointed to matches.

England shows another way

England has already built the structure Australia is struggling to create. Professional Game Referees, or Pro Ref, is the central body overseeing refereeing across the Premier League, EFL, WSL Football and FA competitions. It is funded by those aforementioned competitions.

The important distinction is those competitions do not each run their own separate professional refereeing workforce. Pro Ref manages the system. It oversees appointments, development, training and performance. For the 2026-27 season, its new Professional Referee Group will service the Premier League and EFL Championship.

Officials work within the same professional structure and can be selected across competitions. That centralisation brings consistency. It also allows referees to be treated as a professional group rather than a collection of officials contracted separately by different competitions.

Whilst it is centralised, the system is not perfect. England has also recognised the need for greater independence in assessing referee performances due to Pro Ref being owned and funded by leagues and, as a result, the clubs they represent. However, as the body is also owned in part by the English FA, the governing body can oversee practices.

Pro Ref has also implemented world-leading officiating practices. Its Key Match Incidents panel includes former players and coaches, alongside representatives from the Premier League and Pro Ref, and reviews major decisions independently each week.

Pro Ref now has dedicated development groups, specialist coaching, sports science, psychology and performance analysis. 37 Pro Ref officials are currently on the FIFA International List. That does not prove centralisation alone creates better referees. But it shows what happens when refereeing receives a professional structure, long-term investment and consistent management.

Australian football needs to collaborate

This is where the Australian dispute becomes bigger than referees. Football Australia and the APL have been unable to secure agreement over who funds the referees over a long period of time, leading to this standoff; it comes at the same time as the APL’s difficulty in negotiating a new CBA with the players’ union.

Both organisations have a role in running their respective parts of the Australian game, but again an industrial dispute has the game appearing in shambles on the eve of another domestic season.

The most frustrating part of this dispute is that everyone needs the same thing. Football Australia and the APL need referees; there is no doubt the refs deeply value their employment at the elite level. With due respect to Wednesday’s flow-in Singaporean officials – themselves from a valued partner member through our shared position in the AFC – nobody wants to see the circumstances under which they were required on Wednesday continue any longer.

The PFRA dispute should therefore be treated as more than an industrial disagreement. It is an opportunity to fix the structure. Australia should learn from the principle behind Pro Ref and the English system. Centralise, professionalise and protect the officials who manage the game.

Most Popular Topics

Editor Picks

Send this to a friend