Transfer fees and salary cap exempt foreigners in the A-League? Be careful what you wish for

Chief executive of Football Federation Australia James Johnson recently cited a need to re-evaluate the transfer fee system in the domestic game. At the same time, the newly independent A-League owners and the PFA appear determined to implement changes to the rules around marquee and foreign players; allowing clubs to sign up to five whose wages would sit outside the salary cap.

Both are long called for and would have instant and immense ramifications for the A-League.

Johnson’s comments around the transfer system stem from a desire to increase revenue streams for clubs currently bound by regulations that allow no internal A-League transfer fees. In 2019, Australian clubs took in a paltry A$1.9 million; well below the fees gathered by other heavy hitters in the Asian Confederation.

The amount ranks Australia 67th internationally, something that Johnson feels is unacceptable considering the men’s national team sits in 42nd place in the international rankings. Johnson wrote the book on transfer fees and regulations in his role at FIFA and as those changes filter through internationally, his view is that Australia does not have the option to change, but must change, should they wish to keep step with the rest of the globe.

Much of the discussion in the area of transfer fees lies in junior development, with many NPL clubs feeling they remain unrewarded for developing talent. Such talent is often poached by A-League clubs with no reward received for the financial and resource commitment made to the player and their youth structures.

Should the payment of transfer fees in such a situation become a reality, clubs that churn out junior talent will be rewarded with financial compensation. Those funds could be re-invested into the next crop of players and clubs that have traditionally been effective in producing young talent, only for others to swoop and pounce as they reach maturity, could develop a substantial and consistent revenue stream.

Clubs with vast nurseries in major capital cities will surely hold an advantage, however, the process of assigning true value to footballers and ensuring that clubs pay and receive the appropriate sum is a no-brainer when it comes to advancing the Australian game.

Potentially more ground breaking are the discussions between the A-League owners and the PFA in regards to marquee and foreign wages. Currently, each club is permitted two marquee men whose wages fall outside the salary cap.

Of the current eleven clubs, only Perth Glory, Melbourne Victory and Western United have two such marquees. Adelaide United, Brisbane Roar and Newcastle Jets have none whatsoever and the remaining five clubs all have one man on the books whose wages do not impinge on the A$3.2 million salary cap.

The argument for an opening of the purse strings that could see the 12 A-League clubs in 2020/2021 bring up to 60 marquee/foreign men from around the globe into the league is all about quality. The lure is a suggestion that clubs with the financial clout to attract better pedigree from overseas would effectively raise the standard of play across the league.

Moreover, the commercial ramifications of the introduction of big name international players has some salivating at the thought. Many will cite Alessandro Del Piero’s time at Sydney FC as the benchmark and the goal; where the domestic league garnered interest from many fans who had rarely, if ever, attended an A-League match.

Whilst the excitement of each and every A-League club acquiring up to five Del Pierro like players to ignite the competition is an attractive thought, the feasibility of such a boom in spending is questionable. With just 11 of the 22 current A-League marquee spots filled, one wonders how the club’s owners could dare engage in a spending spree that would see their wage bill increase exponentially.

Certainly, ticket sales and corporate interest would generate revenue in the medium term. However, with owners making consistent losses across the league, the chances of wholesale spending with little assurance of return appears low.

More important could be the ramifications of a more open market in terms of marquee and foreign wages, where the spending power of smaller clubs could well see them phased out of competitiveness quite briskly. The Central Coast Mariners function in a region of somewhere between 300,000 and 400,000 people. The club spent just A$2.88 million on wages for the 2019/20 season; the salary floor figure mandated by FFA.

Should Sydney FC, Melbourne City, Melbourne Victory and Perth Glory be afforded the license to acquire up to five foreigners outside the salary cap restrictions, one can only imagine the increased chasm between the playing talent in their squads compared to that of the Mariners.

Natural attrition would almost certainly take place; something that exists across the globe in world football as one team is relegated and another promoted. However, without a current and efficient system of promotion/relegation in the domestic game and a host of clubs with the facilities and finances ready to step into the top tier, the A-League could potentially lose now competitive teams well before the games growth permits an expanded competition of at least 16 teams; something we all hope to see.

Whilst Johnson’s desire to change the Australian transfer fee regulations and the proposed freeing up of the current buying power of the clubs when it comes to marquee/foreign wages sound exciting for the domestic game, there will be casualties.

The question that must be asked and considered carefully is whether the game can afford those causalities right now. The salary cap and the restriction on transfer fees were implemented to protect the A-League in its infancy.

Whether the competition is old enough for such measures to be lifted is, in my opinion, up for debate.

Staff Writer
Soccerscene is committed to promoting, enhancing and growing the soccer industry in Australia. We believe soccer news has captured the attention of grassroots soccer clubs, apparel and equipment suppliers – which extends to governing bodies, club administrators and industry decision makers. Many of the auxiliary products and services support the growth of the soccer industry in Australia and Asia, a passion we also share and want to express through our work.

Unpacking the Biological Maturation Process for Football NSW

Football NSW’s new Biological Maturation Process for the 2025 season outlines a framework that allows players who “Are potentially disadvantaged from a physical perspective, due to later biological maturity” to play in lower age groups.

Players assessed as biologically “late developers” for their chronological age will be approved to play down an age grade provided there are positions available at their club, whereas players assigned as “on-time” or “early developers” are NOT.

It will be applied only for NSW’s girls’ and boys’ Youth Leagues one, two and three from ages 13 to 15.

Only one “late developer” is allowed per age group team and must be registered on their ID as a ‘late developer.’

The test conducted is based on the estimated age at peak height velocity (APHV) measuring differing factors of height and weight. This is then cross-referenced with normative data for boys and girls.

Biological maturity testing will be conducted at Valentine Park on the following dates:

  • Monday, 9 September 2024
  • Monday, 30 September 2024
  • Monday, 25 November 2024 – FINAL DATE

The player must be registered before conducting these tests.

One cannot argue against speed, strength and agility being hallmarks of modern football athletes who are regarded as some of the fittest in the world.

However, football and modern development programs have always advocated that these factors do not only make one a great footballer.

Highly regarded academies such as Barcelona’s La Masia have mainly championed technical ability, hard work and teamwork as routes to success.

Some of the more famous and arguably the best players the world has known have been small or under-developed for their age. Lionel Messi and fellow countryman Diego Maradona, are adored due to their technique and ability, not for their physical prowess.

Even the most physical of positions has had players breaking the stereotypes, Italian centre-back Fabio Cannavaro a World Cup and Ballon-d’Or-winning stands at 6’9.

For a modern example, Manchester United’s Lisandro Martinez 6’9 has proven many critics wrong about his ability to adapt to the physicality of the English Premier League.

Spain’s Aitana Bonmati at 6’3 won the golden ball on these shores in the 2023 FIFA Women’s World Cup. Not to mention is one of the most decorated individual players for a singular season in 2022-23 with Barcelona Feminine, who she captained to a famous treble.

One does not even have to travel overseas to observe this dichotomy, Josh Nisbet who stands at 5’2 was one of the best midfielders in the A-Leagues along with a plethora of players who have broken this stereotype to be successful.

Would these player’s growth as footballers have been stumped by these rules? Would they not have to challenge and adapt their game to play tougher opponents due to their disadvantage? This same physical disadvantage many explained to have been a barrier for them have turned out to be a strength of theirs.

Another topic that’s been championed by many footballers now is the psychological side of sport.

How would it feel for these players in their formative years to be seen as physically underdeveloped and must drop age groups to perform well? How will it be received by other kids or different academy prospects?

There is no shame in finding it difficult or not up to the task. Nor for parents, coaches and technical directors, important figures in these children’s lives, wanting to protect their children and players and give them the best environment to strive.

Now we must accept that the aforementioned players are grown adults who have gone through their bodies’ development.

Maybe a player who has serious development issues or doesn’t show massive quality could do leaps and bounds with this opportunity.

The age group changes are not huge and physical disadvantages have been identified as problems within youth throughout footballing history.

Football NSW also have data and studies to support their decision.

A study from 2020 of Spanish youth football reported that applying biological maturity can diminish the loss of quality in players. On top of this it highlights the need to focus not on competitive results.

Which to Football NSW’s credit they have made a core of their strategies for development but at these age groups specified this focus becomes harder to maintain.

Though the same study around is based centrally around RAE (Relative Age Effect) with people born in the beginning of the year compared to later. Playing down a age group wasn’t an option mentioned, and the psychological effects were still a variable missing a more prevalent analysis.

Is this the forward-thinking that Australian football needs to answer the crucial questions of physical development? This move seems like one that is very possibly going in the right direction.

Maybe it’s old-fashioned to reject this idea, though one cannot help but fear the possibility of holding back young players due to their physical ability or the effect it can have on them psychologically.

Football is a sport for all people no matter what their differences, that’s why it has coined the title ‘The Beautiful Game” and that’s something that shouldn’t be taken lightly.

If you wish to learn more click here.

Football Queensland presents 2024-2026 Infrastructure Strategy

Matildas vs France Women's World Cup

Football Queensland has released its new 2024-2026 infrastructure strategy outlining centrally that collaboration with the government will be necessary for infrastructure investment over the next three years.

FQ and Football Australia did quantitative research on community club infrastructure and found the need for millions of dollars worth of infrastructure to support this growth and maintain numbers.

The first point of call is “Unlocking the Legacy of the FWWC23.”

FQ CEO Robert Cavallucci expressed his delight on releasing the Infrastructure Strategy.

“We are delighted to release the 2024-2026 Infrastructure Strategy which builds on our previous 2020 – 2024 Infrastructure Strategy and details our roadmap to securing the vital investment required in our greenspace to build capacity as we work towards achieving our goal of 50/50 gender parity by 2027,” he said via press release.

“Football, as Queensland’s leading team participation sport, continues to grow annually at a double-digit rate, with a staggering 44% surge in female participation (and 29% overall growth) in outdoor players alone in the first quarter of 2024 following the FIFA Women’s World Cup 2023.”

FQ has recorded 300,000 participants with an impressive 65% growth in the last 4 years.

In conjunction with this data, there was a +470% increase in talent pathway athletes and a +330% increase in female participation since 2016.

Also on the national teams, the FQ has a massive role with 50% of the 23FWWC Matildas and Olympic football teams coming through FQ pathways.

Despite these remarkable statistics, looking at it from an infrastructure perspective Robert Cavallucci continues on by saying that football has reached a crisis situation.

“From an infrastructure perspective, based on its continued growth, the game has reached a critical crossroads due to historical underinvestment.”

This struggling infrastructure leads to Challenges such as:

  • Physical and Mental Health Challenges including youth crime.
  • Economic Challenges
  • Reduced Physical Activity
  • Environmental Impact
  • Lack of Opportunities

The study behind this strategy is based on the National Football Facilities Audit Tool.

Provided by the partnership of FQ with Football Australia and another 8 member federations.

It has over 13.5 million data points, providing crucial business intelligence and pinpointing infrastructure gaps for clubs to work on FQ with Football Australia and another 8 member federations introduced the sport’s inaugural.

This data will help FQ in increasing its workforce capabilities with a precise mobilisation of its participation base.

This will be upheld by key campaigns on targeted events and participation, including advocacy within the community to engage with the government and support further education of participants to upgrade the development and quality of personnel.

The Strategy has been broken up into 3 priorities:

Priority 1: State Home of Community Football Pathways

FQ aims to establish a consolidated State Home of Community Football at Meakin Park.

It will significantly contribute to local economic growth and enhance physical and mental well-being through improved facility access, events at various levels (local, state, and national), and community activations.

The benefits:

  • Local economic activity.
  • Supports local sports clubs.
  • Multi-purpose indoor facility access.
  • Community Access.
  • International level training facility.
  • Economic activity through events.

As of December 2023, the estimated cost of this project is $70 million.

Priority 2: Community Football Infrastructure Fund

FQ with the Queensland state government will have a funding model in partnership that would see $20 million per annum invested over an initial three-year period in capacity and capability improvement projects.

Will also advocate for state funding grants for community football, planning for 20 facility improvements annually.

There is a need for large-scale facilities for the lower leagues and training of youth as well as high-performance training facilities in the state.

The benefits:

  • Improved club capacity and capability.
  • Targeted investment (need as opposed to want).
  • Promotes football & Government, co-contribution model.

 Priority 3: Tier 2 Stadium Fit-For-Purpose Stadia

The proposed new 15,000-20,000 seat stadium would be an international state-of-the-art venue tailored for football and a range of events from conferences to concerts.

This would support the commercial viability of the sport, especially the female game and the hosting of the 2032 Brisbane Olympics.

The Benefits:

  • Fit-for-purpose football stadia.
  • Supports professional sports’ economic viability.
  • Promotes Brisbane as a global sports capital.

The estimated cost from December 2023 is 200 million.

The strategy is based on hard evidence, community data and a thorough plan to develop the lacking areas of the game. It does highlight the need for the support of the government, otherwise, the strategy has the potential to struggle.

Overall, however, the outlined process looks promising and with the future AFC2026 and Olympics 2032 competitions, it is an area the government needs to support, and this strategy proves Football Queensland have the dedication and preparation to see it through.

To read through the full 2024-26 Infrastructure Strategy, click here.

Most Popular Topics

Editor Picks

Send this to a friend