“You really don’t know which way your career is going to go” – Aurelio Vidmar on Asian football exploits

Aurelio Vidmar

Aurelio Vidmar sees the impending reduction of Australian qualifying slots in the Asian Champions League as a ‘real disappointment’, but still believes Aussie sides can have a big impact on the competition.

Vidmar is as qualified to speak on the ACL as anyone in Australia, and to the shifting face of football in the region broadly; manager of Adelaide United’s ground-breaking run to the final in 2008 and follow-up trip to the Round of 16 in 2010, he more recently helped Thailand’s BG Pathum United to the knockout stage for the first time in their history in 2021.


13 wins from 25 matches has him only behind Tony Popovic as the most successful Australian in Asian football’s pinnacle club tournament, but chances for compatriots to replicate their feats appear bleak. From 2024/25 the ACL’s two-tier structure will split into three, with participants at the top level cut from 40 to 24. At most, Australia will have just one guaranteed top-flight entrant, as the AFC looks to redistribute revenue among participant clubs.

“It’s disappointing. I think Australian teams can still go there and have a big impact, but losing the second automatic spot and a playoff spot is not ideal. Results over the past three-to-four years haven’t been great and that’s probably why they’ve reduced our slots,” Vidmar told Soccerscene from his home in Adelaide, where he’s returned since leaving True Bangkok United in December.

“For a country like Australia, we should have two automatic slots. Our league needs to grow – if you look at Thailand they have four divisions, with 16-18 teams in each. So there’s competition for places, within the league itself, and we need to grow to that stage.”

Vidmar is well placed to give credence or otherwise to the general Australian notion that nations such as Thailand or Vietnam, sometimes patronised as ‘developing’ or ‘second-tier’ regarding football, are set to grow and engulf the stagnant Australian system.


The expansion of the World Cup means this is now unlikely to play out in the international arena. But Vidmar believes the shift is undeniably afoot in club football; through two stints as manager of BG Pathum (formerly Bangkok Glass) and one with Singapore’s Lion City Sailors, he’s seen how investment can accelerate a club, while watching Australian club performances wane from afar.

The Champions League has changed a lot. In 2007/08 only the top team qualified [from the group], most teams were only getting $25,000 to help with travel on away legs. Prize Money was not much for the winner or runners up, but that’s increased as well ($US600,000 in 2008 to $US4million in 2023),” he explained.

“Now the top two sides qualify [until the change from 2024/25], not that it makes it easier – I was at Melbourne City when they played Pathum and didn’t qualify with a very good team. That tells you the strength of the competition now.”


Vidmar’s introduction to Asian football came late in his playing career, aged 31. In mid-1998 he became the third Australian to sign at Sanfrecce Hiroshima under the man who’d managed him through the bulk of his Socceroos career, Scottish manager Eddie Thomson.

A hardened attacker who graduated through a golden age at Adelaide City, Vidmar carved a highly-successful career in Belgium, that peaked in winning the 1994/95 League golden boot with Standard Liége. But stints in Switzerland and Spain didn’t bring the same rewards, and he was only too happy to draw the curtain on Europe.

“At the time I was in Spain at Tenerife, but hadn’t been playing in my second year there. I got a call from the late Eddie Thomson and it wasn’t long before I said yes. Sanfrecce were a great club and Japanese football at that stage had boomed, with the J1 League starting in 1993,” he shared.

“But by 1997-99 it was in a bit of a lull. We were playing at the Arch Stadium, a 36,000 seater with only 15-16,000 there, so it had dropped off a hell of a lot. At the time Tony Popovic and Hayden Foxe were the two Aussies there, two top guys and top athletes, so we had a great time.”

A return to Adelaide followed as his career wound down in the dying days of the NSL, firstly with City and finally in the foundation years of United. By the time Vidmar ascended to the managerial top job after a year as John Kosmina’s assistant, Australia had achieved its long-held goal of shifting federations from Oceania to Asia.

The Socceroos had the first opportunity to make a mark for Australian football in its new home, but disappointed in exiting the 2007 Asian Cup at the quarter-final stage. Instead it was Vidmar’s Reds, in driving to the final of the 2008 Champions League, that made the first big inroads.

“It was an awesome period for the club. The first year we were in it, 2007 under Kossie, we didn’t qualify [out of the group stage], although we did well and learnt a hell of a lot from that first foray. No one, including supporters, really knew too much about it, but it really grew legs the following year because we did so well.”

Hindmarsh routinely drew sell-out crowds of 17,000 as Cassio, Travis Dodd & Sasa Ognenovski et al. topped their group, moved past Kashima Antlers and Karavchi (now Bunyodkor) through the knockouts, and ultimately met Gamba Osaka in the final. Few remember the 5-0 aggregate scoreline by which they lost, but many remember what a rollicking, if somewhat naïve, run it was.

“Every game was the old cliche, one at a time. We played against top quality opposition, had a little bit of luck, had good structures. We did the damage at the right time and got there in the end,” Vidmar said.

But for all this, Vidmar still didn’t envision he’d go on to spend the majority of his managerial career to this point in the eclectic environment of Asian football.

“It wasn’t a love of the region. We loved what we were doing, the profession is very difficult as we know, so just being involved in it and trying to give some sort of impact was really why we are in it  – the impact of doing well as a club or helping player’s careers, that’s why we’re in it. But you really don’t know which way your career is going to go.”



Vidmar managed United until the end of the 2011/12, before moving back to the familiarity of the national team as boss of the Under 20’s and senior assistant to Holger Osiek. Incidentally, he oversaw a 3-0 win over Canada between Osiek’s sacking and Ange Postecoglou’s appointment, in October 2013.

Vidmar was 46 and had spent his life in Australian football. A 53-cap Socceroo who’d lived the heartbreak of repeated World-Cup near-misses, he’d finished playing as a well-travelled professional and had grown into an experienced domestic manager.


But you never stop learning, and ahead was a plunge back into the unknown. Vidmar had seen the pinnacle of Asian football as a player and manager, but now loomed an education in the unpredictability and politics of the game further down the chain. 


“I’d finished with the national team and got a call from Bangkok Glass one day and to be honest, I didn’t know much about them. We knew Thailand had some talented national players but I didn’t know much about the Thai First Division,” he reflected.

“I went there, met them, and… it was very strange. As I’m talking to the owners and the board, the Chairman steps up and says to my agent he wanted to speak to him outside. The interview had only been going five minutes, so I thought ‘s**t, this has either gone very well or very poorly!’


“So I’m sitting there with the rest of the board, s**t talking, small talk, they come back in within two minutes and the Chairman taps his hand on the table and says ‘let’s just get this deal done.

“I had a really good time there but learnt very quickly that, especially in Thailand, they’re very passionate but also emotional and sometimes irrational – and that’s exactly how it panned out. I finished the last ten games of 2016/17 and went back for 2017/18, but it ended poorly.

“We had not a bad team, but weren’t the best because we were spending significantly less than Muangthong, Buriram, Chiangrai… when I got sacked we were sitting third. I was sacked as I wasn’t listening to what the Chairman wanted, doing my own thing. They couldn’t accept that, so I was shown the door.”

18 months later he signed as manager of one of Asia’s most ambitious clubs, Singapore’s Home United, on the verge of an influx of funding from incoming Chairman and Singaporean billionaire Forrest Li.


“I had no interest in going to Singapore but sometimes, right from the beginning, it’s what you’re looking for. There was synergy, people with the same ideas, the same direction. Within a week we’d agreed on a deal,” he explained.


“I knew the competition wasn’t the highest standard in South-East Asia, but they were just about to be bought by Li. We played one season, then he changed the name to Lion City Sailors. Not just the colours, but the whole fabric shifted; he spent over $15 million on buying a first team, academy, training centre. They’re miles and miles ahead of the rest in Singapore. 

“I was happy, doing our thing… and then out of the blue the Bangkok Glass Chairman rings me. He starts chatting away and says ‘look, I made a mistake, you’re the best coach we’ve had and I shouldn’t have done what I did. We want you back.’ I thought ‘Jesus Christ’, given the timing of everything!

“I was very honest with Forrest Li. He said he’d never stand in the way of me wanting to improve myself and coaching at a higher level. The Champions League was also very attractive to me – it was the first time Pathum United (rebranded from Bangkok Glass), as they were now called, had been there.”

Vidmar picked up where he’d left off, helping the side through a group that included the formidable Ulsan Hyundai, and onto a Round of 16 clash with Jeonbuk Motors. Domestically the side also lifted the Thailand Champions Cup, but Covid-complications meant Vidmar handed the reins to an assistant for the trip to South Korea.

“They did really well, got knocked out on penalties, the club never expected them to get that far. I do love the Champions League, it’s a great competition and I’ve had a great deal of fortune.”




If Australian sides are to return to the halcyon days of Adelaide’s 2008 run to the finals, or the Wanderers 2014 triumph, Vidmar sees the development of the domestic league, and an increase in competitiveness, as the means.

“I don’t know the mechanics of a ‘B-League’… but even in smaller South-East Asian leagues, it’s not a given that you’re in the top division. We really need to get to that stage.”

Football Australia’s progress towards a National Second Division continues gradually, and whether that will be stitched into the A-League remains a far-flung reality – ‘although it’s romantic, if I was an owner or chair I wouldn’t rush to jump in’, but there really is no time to delay as investment continues to flood into the broader region. In the short-term, increasing familiarity remains an option.

“I think the player market is still untapped. We’ve got a couple of good Japanese players in the League but places like Vietnam, Thailand… There are a hell of a lot of good players out there. They earn good money at home and that’s probably part of the reason why they won’t come out, but those sorts of regions need to be looked at.”

Next season Melbourne City will play in the Champions League, with no Australian sides afforded a play-off spot; by comparison, Japan and South Korea each have three sides guaranteed and one play-off spot, Thailand and China two and two. That the Central Coast Mariners and Macarthur Bulls will play in the second-tier AFC Cup says much about Australia’s slide in the region.

Unless changes are made, these nations will continue to shine on the Champions League stage at Australia’s expense. The trend is not irreversible, but the task needs to be fully embraced – take it from someone who knows what it is to break new ground in the region.

 

Previous ArticleNext Article

South Melbourne’s A-League dream is still a bridge too far

The A-League has just lost a Victorian club. The death of Western United and the suspension of its license by the Australian Professional Leagues (APL) on August 10th was inevitable. The club says it wants to rebuild and eventually return to the competition. That is unlikely to happen considering the search for new owners has to begin.

But one day after the announcement from Western United, South Melbourne stepped forward. The four-time NSL winners announced their intention to begin formal discussions with the APL about joining the A-Leagues. They believe the timing is right. Their argument is understandable. Their football credentials and history are stronger than most A-League teams.

But there is a problem. South Melbourne may have the history. It may have the supporters. It may even have one of the most attractive potential derbies in Australian football. But that does not mean it will get an A-League licence.

In fact, the more realistic prediction from my perspective is that South Melbourne will once again be told no.

South Melbourne has never been better placed

There is plenty to like about South Melbourne’s position. The club is not simply relying on its history. South Melbourne returned to national competition through the inaugural Australian Championship in 2025. It did not merely participate. South Melbourne won it. The club defeated Marconi Stallions 2-0 in the final to become the competition’s first champion.

That achievement matters. The Australian Championship was created to bridge state-based football and the professional game. Whilst it is seen as a second tier, there is no promotion and relegation with the A-League. But it has also continued to perform on the national stage. In the 2026 Australia Cup, which South Melbourne qualified for, they reached the final rounds and then produced one of the biggest results of the tournament.

Adelaide United came to Lakeside Stadium. South Melbourne won 2-1. Adelaide had won the Australia Cup three times. South knocked them out in front of its own supporters. They’re now into the quarter-finals of the 2026 Australia Cup.

South Melbourne celebrating the Australian Championship Image Credits: South Melbourne FC

The club also has a much bigger story to tell than its recent results. Alongside its four NSL victories, the club also won the 1999 Oceania Club Championship and represented Oceania at the 2000 FIFA Club World Championship. The club has a dedicated supporter base and the history to deserve a place.

The club says its Oceania Professional League participation has helped make it Australia’s 13th professional football club. It has more than 150 businesses supporting it in 2026 and a long-term arrangement at Lakeside Stadium, in the heart of South Melbourne.

On the football side, it wants to continue competing in the NPL, Australian Championship and Oceania competition even if it enters the A-Leagues. It also has lofty ambitions to introduce an A-League women’s side.

On paper, it is difficult to argue that South Melbourne is not ready. The problem is that readiness and admission are two different things.

Third time’s the charm?

South Melbourne’s current push is not new. It has been here before. The club was pursuing an A-League return almost immediately after the NSL disappeared. In 2007, South announced its interest in becoming the second Victorian A-League club.

Then came the 2008-09 process. South Melbourne backed the Southern Cross bid for the second Victorian licence. The club proposed a new team based around the redevelopment of Bob Jane Stadium and involvement from the broader Victorian football community.

It lost. The Melbourne Heart bid won the race and eventually became Melbourne City. That was South Melbourne’s first major warning. Its football heritage was not enough. Its second major attempt came almost a decade later.

The 2017-18 expansion process produced the most serious South Melbourne bid yet. South made the shortlist for an expanded A-League licence. It ultimately lost to Western United. Bill Papastergiadis has since explained that he did not genuinely expect South Melbourne to win in 2018, despite believing strongly that the club belonged in the A-League. He also reflected on the barriers facing a traditional club trying to enter the existing Victorian professional football ecosystem.

That is important context for today’s bid. South Melbourne is not entering negotiations without understanding how difficult the politics and economics of the Victorian football market can be. The club has tried the direct route twice. Neither time worked.

The Western United lesson

This is where the current situation becomes complicated. In isolation, adding South Melbourne would be fantastic for the A-League. Imagine South Melbourne against Melbourne Victory. The atmosphere would be enormous.

There is a genuine football rivalry waiting to happen. South itself points to the potential for ready-made derbies and commercial interest. But the argument that Melbourne should simply have three A-League clubs because Melbourne is a huge city ignores what has just happened to Western United.

Western United was supposed to represent Melbourne’s rapidly growing west. Its original vision centred on a major project in Geelong. The club eventually moved into Ironbark Fields in Tarneit in 2024.

Yet the geographic separation never became as clear as the original concept suggested. Western United was not a Geelong club. It was not a regional Victorian club in the traditional sense. It was a western Melbourne club based and that matters.

The A-League already has Melbourne City and Melbourne Victory. Adding South Melbourne would give the competition three clubs operating within the same metropolitan football market. It is not necessarily brilliant for the business model, which has already lost a club operating on the outskirts of Melbourne.

The NSL offers an interesting historical comparison. The Falcons provide an even more striking Victorian example. They became the first and only regional Victorian club to play in the NSL, reaching the finals in 1996. The distinction is important.

A national competition can expand its footprint by adding genuinely new markets. That is different from adding another club inside an existing Melbourne metropolitan market. That was what was envisioned for Western United, and it failed quickly.

Will the APL see South Melbourne as a safe investment? Despite the fact they’re a well-established club, I’d argue the answer is no.

Promotion and relegation is the only realistic route

There is one scenario where South Melbourne could eventually force its way into the A-League, and that’s the great missing piece of Australian football. Promotion and relegation. South Melbourne would not need somebody to decide that Melbourne suddenly has room for another licence. It would simply need to earn it.

They would have done just that in 2025, winning the Australian Championship if the football pyramid was open. Football Australia originally designed the National Second Tier with the possibility of promotion and relegation being considered once the competition matured.

The format connects NPL clubs and established foundation clubs with national competition. It does not provide a sporting pathway into the A-League. South Melbourne can win the Australian Championship, NSL and Australia Cup but none of those achievements automatically produce an A-League licence.

South Melbourne in the Oceania Championship Image Credits: Oceania Championship

Opening the pyramid is far more complicated than simply announcing promotion and relegation. Australia’s football calendar is fragmented. The A-League operates primarily through the summer months. The NPL operates through the winter and early spring. For the 2026-27 season, the A-League Men runs from October to June, while the NPL begins in February and finishes in September.

That creates an enormous structural problem for a fully connected pyramid. The clubs below the A-League would need to operate at a level capable of supporting professional football. If the A-League aligned with the NPL and the lower pyramid, it would compete in a football calendar that already has to coexist with Australia’s other major winter sports. That is a difficult feat against bigger leagues such as the AFL and NRL.

Beyond that, clubs lower down would need travel budgets and to survive commercially would take real sacrifice from all parties to make that work. The A-League’s existing clubs also have something to lose. They have invested heavily in their licences and their businesses.

Historically, A-League licences were extended through to 2034, while those licence arrangements have included provisions allowing promotion and relegation to be introduced. But the existing clubs will do everything in their power to block it. Promotion and relegation removes certainty. An A-League club can finish last in the current system with no threat to their place. Under relegation, its place is no longer guaranteed.

That is a major commercial change for clubs that have invested in securing their position in the competition. It is therefore difficult to imagine the A-League opening the door. The A-League’s licensing system gives the competition enormous control over who enters, and for South Melbourne historically they’ve been left out in the cold.

South Melbourne deserves the conversation.

The frustrating part is South Melbourne has probably never had a stronger argument. It has history, supporters, infrastructure, commercial support and most importantly, ambition. Beating A-League clubs in national competition proves the capability is there.

It deserves to be in the conversation. But being in the conversation is not the same as being selected. The Western United experience should be a warning. If the A-League could not make the Western United project work, it is difficult to see why it would suddenly decide that another Melbourne club is the answer.

South Melbourne may be the better football story. It may even be the better football club. But the A-League is not simply selecting the best football story.

It is selecting a professional competition, and until Australia embraces a genuine promotion and relegation system, South Melbourne’s path back to the top flight will remain dependent on someone handing it a licence.

That is the part of the dream that looks unrealistic. South Melbourne can keep knocking and it should. They always say third time’s the charm. But unless the pyramid is opened, I expect the door to remain closed.

Football Australia backs AFC calls for FIFA governance reform

Football Australia has backed calls from the Asian Football Confederation (AFC) for stronger governance, transparency and accountability at FIFA.

Pressure continues to grow on world football’s governing body following the collapse of its controversial commercial proposal.

Football Australia said it supports the AFC’s position that the events of recent weeks should be met with “clear and credible action” to strengthen FIFA’s governance systems.

The Australian governing body said its priority was a “transparent and appropriately independent process” to establish what happened, why it happened and where governance, communication and decision-making processes fell short.

The statement follows a joint call from the AFC, UEFA and CONCACAF for greater accountability within FIFA after President Gianni Infantino’s proposal to create a commercial entity involving the sale of stakes in World Cup-related assets was abandoned.

The episode has since triggered a wider governance dispute in football, amid mounting calls for structural changes within FIFA.

FIFPRO Europe president David Terrier argued that the organisation needs sweeping governance reform rather than simply a change of leadership.

Football Australia stopped short of explicitly calling for Infantino’s resignation, instead aligning itself with the AFC’s broader call for institutional reform.

“Football Australia will continue to engage actively and constructively with and through our Confederation, the AFC, and alongside our fellow Member Associations as this process progresses,” the governing body said.

The position gives the AFC further backing from one of its major member associations.

FIFA faces an increasingly public and volatile debate over how power, commercial decision-making and accountability should operate within the global game.

Infantino remains in office and is seeking re-election, with the next FIFA presidential election scheduled for March 2027.

Most Popular Topics

Editor Picks

Send this to a friend