NSW Sports Minister puts plan forward for return of community sport

NSW grassroots clubs and associations have received a major boost in the road towards returning to a COVID-safe community sport setup.

Whilst roadmap plans had been provided for the hospitality and education sectors in recent weeks, the community sporting sector had been left in the dark in the path to return to normality.

Speaking with Chris Smith at 2GB, NSW Sports Minister Natalie Ward outlined the future for community sporting clubs and associations going forward.

“I’ve put a plan forward. I have been a really strong advocate for a return to community sport. I’ve spoken to [NSW Health Minister] Brad Hazzard as recently as yesterday, and I’ve spoken with all of the sporting organisations to put a plan to him to say that we need a clear pathway out of here,” she said.

“Double vax is the key of course, and that is so that we can provide that clarity. The government’s announced that at 70% double-dosed groups of 20 can gather, so why can’t they gather and train together? Why can’t they be out there training and kicking a ball around?”

When probed about the potential attendance of parents at community sporting events, Ward was empathetic to the challenges NSW sporting families have faced whilst remaining cautious.

“We know that last time in lockdown that parents were restricted in what they could do. Now we know with the double dose that people are very aware that they need to comply with those orders [and] to do so safely so that everyone attending can do it in a very COVID-safe way,” she said.

“The last thing we want is to be able to open up the season and then have to shut it down.”

In support of the clubs and associations, Ward added: “I’ve got such faith in them [the clubs and associations], because they know their players; they know their members; they know their registrations; and they’re really good at implementing these plans.”

“So, I’ve put to [NSW] Health that there’s no better organisations than these sporting clubs [and] community clubs who have these volunteers that take this really seriously. They know this better than anyone.

“I’ve got confidence in them and I’ve said they’re ready, willing and able to implement this plan to give us a clear green light to get going.”

For grassroots clubs who have unfortunately had to shut down due to the impact of the extensive lockdown, Ward stressed the importance of providing a lifeline.

“It’s been really distressing. My family has been involved in a grassroots club [and] they run on nothing – the smell of an oily rag and volunteers,” she said.

“I have said to the treasurer that he needs to consider that they’re really clinging on. And the sooner that we can open the season up, even late as it is, as soon as we can get out there that’s throwing them a lifeline.”

A recent survey of Australia’s 70,000 community sport clubs has found almost all have lost money, with thousands of them facing the risk of going under.

It is found that 83 per cent of respondents reported their earnings were down by an average of $18,500 and 13 per cent feared they could go to the wall. The foundation’s CEO, Patrick Walker, revealed that amounted to about 9,000 clubs nationally.

The full survey, which was commissioned by the Australian Sport Foundation, can be accessed here.

Previous ArticleNext Article

UEFA set to end FIFA boycott threat after World Cup investment plan collapse

UEFA is set to withdraw its threat to boycott FIFA competitions after receiving assurances that a controversial private investment plan will not return. The dispute originally centred on FIFA President Gianni Infantino’s proposal to bring private investors into the commercial rights of the World Cup and other FIFA tournaments.

UEFA strongly opposed the plan. European football leaders argued that major international competitions should not become investment products. FIFA later withdrew the proposal. However, UEFA continued to demand guarantees that it would not be revived.

Those assurances now appear to have eased the immediate conflict.

FIFA’s money move

The dispute was about more than football governance. It raised a major question about who controls football’s most valuable commercial assets.

Infantino’s proposal involved creating a new commercial structure that could have attracted billions of dollars from private investors. Reports put the proposed business at around $28 billion ($20 billion USD), with investors set to take a stake in the new entity. For FIFA, private capital could have created new opportunities to expand commercial revenue and fund football development. For investors, World Cup-related rights would offer exposure to one of the world’s most valuable sporting properties.

But UEFA’s opposition highlighted the risks. Selling part of the commercial upside could reduce FIFA’s control over future revenue and create pressure to prioritise financial returns.

Why it matters for football

The outcome could shape how football’s biggest competitions are financed in the future. FIFA still controls enormous global media, sponsorship and commercial assets. Any move to bring outside investors into those assets could change the balance of power across the sport.

The failed proposal also exposed tensions between FIFA and major football confederations. UEFA, CONCACAF and the AFC all criticised the original plan.

For clubs, broadcasters and sponsors, stability matters. A prolonged dispute between FIFA and UEFA could create uncertainty around competition. The FIFA Under 20 Women’s World Cup kicks off on September 5th. Not only was there debate over whether European nations would participate, but the tournament is being held in the European nation of Poland.

With the boycott officially over, the disruption to the tournament has been alleviated, but wider tensions still remain.

The conflict is not over

UEFA may now drop its boycott threat, but its discontent with Infantino’s leadership remains.

UEFA leaders continue to push for a change at the top of FIFA. European football figures have also called for greater transparency and stronger consultation with football stakeholders. So whilst the immediate business threat has eased, the bigger question remains. Who should control football’s future commercial growth and who could contest Infantino in March at the next presidential election?

Beyond Old Trafford: How Manchester United’s new stadium could reshape an entire district

Manchester United’s proposed new 100,000-seat stadium is more than a replacement for Old Trafford.

It’s the centrepiece of one of the most ambitious urban regeneration projects ever planned by a football club.

Unveiled in March by architects Foster + Partners, the concept would see a new stadium built adjacent to Old Trafford, just 350 metres from the existing ground.

Supported by Trafford Council, the Greater Manchester Combined Authority and Old Trafford Regeneration Mayoral Development Corporation the proposed development aims to transform the area surrounding the stadium into a thriving mixed-use precinct featuring housing, commercial space, public transport improvements and new public amenities.

While the stadium dominated headlines, the broader vision is about much more than just football.

Once complete, the new venue would become the largest club football stadium in the UK, increasing capacity from around 74,000 to 100,000 spectators.

 

More than just a stadium

However, the stadium is only one piece of a much larger plan.

Foster + Partners vision includes new homes, offices, hotels, retail and hospitality spaces, green public areas and improved pedestrian links.

They believe this “mixed-use” destination will attract visitors throughout the year and create a “vibrant destination” for tourists and visitors from across the world.

The proposal also places a strong emphasis on sustainability, with plans for a walkable precinct supported by public transport, rainwater harvesting and renewable energy technologies integrated into the stadium’s distinctive canopy design.

 

A major economic opportunity

The broader regeneration has been positioned as a major economic opportunity for Greater Manchester.

An independent study conducted by Oxford Economics found that the stadium and regeneration project could contribute approximately $15 billion to the UK economy.

In addition, the project would also support around 92,000 jobs while creating more than 17,000 new homes and attracting an additional 1.8 million visitors yearly.

Those figures remain projections rather than guaranteed outcomes, but they have become central to the club’s case for the redevelopment.

 

Connecting United to a Wider European Trend

A key component of the proposal is improving transport connections around Old Trafford

The British Prime Minister Andy Burnham described the project as significant opportunity for the region, with investment in rail, Metrolink and surrounding infrastructure viewed as essential to unlocking the wider regeneration potential.

The plan also includes greater pedestrian accessibility, to integrate the stadium district with surrounding communities.

Manchester United’s proposal reflects a broader trend across Europe football.

Stadium developments are increasingly viewed as catalysts for urban renewal and economic development, rather than standalone sporting venues.

Projects such as Tottenham Hotspur Stadium, Everton’s new waterfront home and Real Madrid’s redevelopment of the Bernabeu have demonstrated how modern stadiums can generate revenue through hospitality, entertainment and commercial activity beyond football.

 

Transforming Old Trafford

Despite support for the proposal, significant hurdles remain before construction can begin.

Funding arrangements, planning approvals and major infrastructure upgrades will all need to be finalised before construction can begin.

If delivered, the project would represent one of the largest football-led regeneration projects ever undertaken in the UK.

The project would transform not only where Manchester United plays, but how the wider Old Trafford district lives, works and grows.

Most Popular Topics

Editor Picks

Send this to a friend