Scottish Premier Football League TV deal with Sky Sports loses momentum

Rangers

The Scottish Professional Football League’s (SPFL) proposed new UK£29.5 million-a-season ($53.2 million AUD) domestic broadcast partnership with Sky Sports is reportedly in doubt after Rangers failed to lend their support to the deal.

Sky has been the sole broadcaster of the Scottish top-flight since the start of the 2020/21 season, having previously shared the rights with BT Sport. The SPFL’s current deal is worth UK£26 million ($46.8 million AUD) a year for up to 48 games a year that lasts until 2025.

Under the terms of the new proposal, Sky would be allowed to show up to 60 matches a season, and obliged to show at least 42, with the option of adding another 10 matches a year at a cost of $6.8 million AUD. Clubs would also be permitted to offer up to five matches on a pay-per-view basis if they have not been selected by Sky.

The Daily Mail reported that all 12 Scottish Premiership Clubs were asked to vote on the deal and to give permission for Sky to increase the number of home games they show from each stadium from four to five. While all other 11 top-flight teams did so, Rangers did not submit a response and the SPFL resolution collapsed.

Rangers are involved in a separate dispute involving the Premiership’s title sponsorship with Cinch but it is also believed the club believe the SPFL could secure a more lucrative deal than the one on the table.

It is now believed the SPFL will hold an emergency meeting to decide how to proceed and whether the deal can be approved by a majority of clubs rather than unanimously.

The SPFL’s current TV deal has critics among those who believe it does not reflect the true value of Scottish football, especially when compared to other European leagues of similar stature. Equally, others are frustrated by the fact that Sky does not broadcast all of the games it is entitled to each season, denying fans of some clubs the opportunity to see their team on TV.

This extension has also attracted criticism, with some commentators believing the SPFL should seek to benefit from increasing competition from streaming services. BT Sport has merged with Discovery, Viaplay has acquired Premier Sports, and DAZN and Amazon are on the lookout for opportunistic deals.

Rangers have been one of the clubs to have criticised the regime and a separate Deloitte report was commissioned by five SPFL clubs in total – additionally Aberdeen, Dundee United, Hearts and Hibernian suggested the SPFL should be targeting closer to UK£50 million ($85.1 million AUD) a year. However, all five have reportedly acquiesced to the SPFL’s proposal, binding them into a contract until 2029.

Previous ArticleNext Article

APL and PFA remain without agreement as bargaining tensions continue

The Australian Professional Leagues (APL) and Professional Footballers Australia (PFA) remain without a new collective bargaining agreement, with negotiations continuing less than three months before the start of the 2026–27 A-Leagues season.

The APL presented the players’ union with a new one-year interim proposal on August 5, which included an increase to the A-League Women salary cap and a commitment to establish a pathway towards full-time professionalism for the women’s competition within 12 months.

The proposed agreement would provide an interim framework while the two parties continue discussions over a longer-term collective bargaining agreement.

APL chief executive Steve Rosich said the proposal reflected the league’s commitment to reaching a sustainable agreement with players following eight months of negotiations.

However, the PFA criticised the APL for publicly announcing the proposal shortly after presenting it to the union, arguing that the approach had further damaged trust between the two parties.

PFA Chief Executive Beau Busch also said players had overwhelmingly rejected the APL’s previous final offer, citing a lack of trust in the league’s ability to ensure its future.

Full-time professionalism for the A-League Women remains a key priority for the PFA, with players seeking improved conditions and greater investment in the competition.

The A-League Men and A-League Women seasons are both scheduled to begin on 16 October 2026.

With the new season approaching, both parties face pressure to resolve the dispute and establish the framework governing player conditions across the A-Leagues.

 

 

Jeff Bezos consortium set for $2.7 billion Liverpool investment

Liverpool could soon welcome one of the world’s richest men into its ownership structure.

Amazon founder Jeff Bezos is part of a consortium in advanced talks to buy a 30% stake in the club.

The proposed deal values Liverpool at around $8.6 billion (4.5 billion pounds). Bezos has a personal fortune estimated at $363 billion.

The investment would give Fenway Sports Group (FSG) a major financial return. It would also allow FSG to keep control of the club, which they bought in 2010.

The proposal has attracted attention across football. It has also created concern among sections of the Liverpool fanbase.

FSG set for major return

FSG bought Liverpool for $573 million (300 million pounds) in 2010. The ownership group later provided further funding through loans. In the last 16 years, the club has undergone major growth.

Liverpool ended a 30-year wait for a league title in 2020. The club also won the Champions League in 2019. Another Premier League title followed in 2025.

Stadium redevelopment and a new training centre have also increased the club’s value. FSG could cash in on $2.7 billion (1.4 billion pounds) if the 30% share is sold.

The deal would therefore represent a huge return on its original investment. However, whilst the investment would provide a massive cash out for the owners of Liverpool, due to Financial Fair Play there won’t be increased investment in the transfer market.

Why Bezos wants Liverpool

Bezos has explored sports investments before. He has been linked with major American franchises such as the NFL’s Seattle Seahawks.

Liverpool would give him a stake in one of football’s biggest global brands. The club also has a large following in the United States. The New York Times has also reported Liverpool has 26 million fans in America.

That makes the investment attractive for investors looking to expand their reach in global sport. American businessmen Eduardo Saverin and Amit Bhatia are also reportedly involved in the consortium.

The deal would add to the growing American influence across English football.

Fans remain cautious

Liverpool supporters have not automatically welcomed the proposal.

The club’s previous experience under Tom Hicks and George Gillett still influences the fanbase.

Supporters also want greater clarity over the consortium’s intentions. Questions remain over board representation, control and the long-term purpose of the investment.

For many fans, ownership must involve more than financial ambition. The Bezos proposal could strengthen Liverpool’s commercial position. It could also deliver a huge payday for FSG.

But until the consortium reveals more about its plans, supporters are likely to treat the deal with scepticism.

Most Popular Topics

Editor Picks

Send this to a friend