FIFPRO report shows rising concern over safety in men’s football

In nearly every profession, workplace safety is a basic right, supported by regulatory and legal frameworks designed to protect employees from accidents and injuries on the job.

However, for footballers, these basic rights are frequently disregarded, as players face abuse, violence, and threats globally.

A football player’s workplace extends beyond the pitch, where visible acts of violence can also occur, to other areas such as the stadium, changing rooms, bus rides to matches, training grounds, and even their family homes.

A FIFPRO report from November underscores the extent and consequences of fan violence and abuse towards professional male footballers, while proposing measures to enhance workplace safety and safeguard player well-being.

The report titled ‘FIFPRO Men’s Football Workplace Safety Report: The Impact of Violence Towards Footballers in Their Workplace,’ is based on player interviews, a survey of 41 national player unions, and media analyses. The report is supported by an academic research paper authored by Dr. Joel Rookwood, Director of the Sport & Exercise Management degree at University College Dublin.

Although 85 percent of player unions believe that the relationship between fans and players is generally very positive and valuable, 76 percent expressed concern over the growing issue of workplace safety for professional footballers, and 66 percent noted that certain aspects of fan culture have become increasingly violent and abusive in recent years.

The survey results are backed by a Council of Europe committee report, published in November under the Saint-Denis Convention, which states that the number of arrests at sports events, especially in top-tier football leagues, is significant and increasingly problematic.

Particular concerns include the use of flares or projectiles, but violence also extends to players being attacked by pitch invaders or targeted from the stands with verbal abuse, which can be discriminatory or directed at their families. Many instances of abuse remain hidden and unreported, as threats and aggression become increasingly normalised.

Abuse and violence have concerning effects: 88 percent of unions reported that the threat of violence negatively impacts player performance, while 83 percent noted its contribution to mental health issues.

Unions support greater use of technology to identify and deter offenders: 98 percent believe that devices like security scanners and facial recognition would enhance player safety; 88 percent think clubs should do more to ban violent fans, and most agree that additional efforts are needed to engage with fans about how abuse and violence affect player well-being.

One anonymous men’s footballer in the report mentioned the media is complicit because they constantly criticise players, which sets a negative example for others.

Some notable cases include Real Madrid forward Vinicius Jr facing repeated racial abuse on the field, including during a game against Valencia last year in May. Several fans directed racist gestures at the Brazilian player, resulting in Valencia’s stadium being closed for three matches and a €27,000 fine.

The report also mentions an insight into women’s football, while it becomes more professionally globally and fan rivalries intensify, concerns about workplace safety and security are becoming increasingly relevant.

Initial survey results reveal that 34% of unions have observed an increase in workplace violence in women’s football, highlighting the rise of match day safety concerns in the women’s game.

Players, unions, clubs, and legislators have suggested a range of solutions to address violence against players, including enhanced awareness of occupational health and safety in professional football and its application to players, enhanced in-stadium policing, stewarding, and surveillance and Collaboration among key stakeholders.

The report has been created by FIFPRO Player IQ, a player-centric knowledge centre designed to influence decision-making in the football industry to safeguard and enhance the careers and working conditions of professional footballers.

To read the full FIFPRO report, click here.

Unpacking the Biological Maturation Process for Football NSW

Football NSW’s new Biological Maturation Process for the 2025 season outlines a framework that allows players who “Are potentially disadvantaged from a physical perspective, due to later biological maturity” to play in lower age groups.

Players assessed as biologically “late developers” for their chronological age will be approved to play down an age grade provided there are positions available at their club, whereas players assigned as “on-time” or “early developers” are NOT.

It will be applied only for NSW’s girls’ and boys’ Youth Leagues one, two and three from ages 13 to 15.

Only one “late developer” is allowed per age group team and must be registered on their ID as a ‘late developer.’

The test conducted is based on the estimated age at peak height velocity (APHV) measuring differing factors of height and weight. This is then cross-referenced with normative data for boys and girls.

Biological maturity testing will be conducted at Valentine Park on the following dates:

  • Monday, 9 September 2024
  • Monday, 30 September 2024
  • Monday, 25 November 2024 – FINAL DATE

The player must be registered before conducting these tests.

One cannot argue against speed, strength and agility being hallmarks of modern football athletes who are regarded as some of the fittest in the world.

However, football and modern development programs have always advocated that these factors do not only make one a great footballer.

Highly regarded academies such as Barcelona’s La Masia have mainly championed technical ability, hard work and teamwork as routes to success.

Some of the more famous and arguably the best players the world has known have been small or under-developed for their age. Lionel Messi and fellow countryman Diego Maradona, are adored due to their technique and ability, not for their physical prowess.

Even the most physical of positions has had players breaking the stereotypes, Italian centre-back Fabio Cannavaro a World Cup and Ballon-d’Or-winning stands at 6’9.

For a modern example, Manchester United’s Lisandro Martinez 6’9 has proven many critics wrong about his ability to adapt to the physicality of the English Premier League.

Spain’s Aitana Bonmati at 6’3 won the golden ball on these shores in the 2023 FIFA Women’s World Cup. Not to mention is one of the most decorated individual players for a singular season in 2022-23 with Barcelona Feminine, who she captained to a famous treble.

One does not even have to travel overseas to observe this dichotomy, Josh Nisbet who stands at 5’2 was one of the best midfielders in the A-Leagues along with a plethora of players who have broken this stereotype to be successful.

Would these player’s growth as footballers have been stumped by these rules? Would they not have to challenge and adapt their game to play tougher opponents due to their disadvantage? This same physical disadvantage many explained to have been a barrier for them have turned out to be a strength of theirs.

Another topic that’s been championed by many footballers now is the psychological side of sport.

How would it feel for these players in their formative years to be seen as physically underdeveloped and must drop age groups to perform well? How will it be received by other kids or different academy prospects?

There is no shame in finding it difficult or not up to the task. Nor for parents, coaches and technical directors, important figures in these children’s lives, wanting to protect their children and players and give them the best environment to strive.

Now we must accept that the aforementioned players are grown adults who have gone through their bodies’ development.

Maybe a player who has serious development issues or doesn’t show massive quality could do leaps and bounds with this opportunity.

The age group changes are not huge and physical disadvantages have been identified as problems within youth throughout footballing history.

Football NSW also have data and studies to support their decision.

A study from 2020 of Spanish youth football reported that applying biological maturity can diminish the loss of quality in players. On top of this it highlights the need to focus not on competitive results.

Which to Football NSW’s credit they have made a core of their strategies for development but at these age groups specified this focus becomes harder to maintain.

Though the same study around is based centrally around RAE (Relative Age Effect) with people born in the beginning of the year compared to later. Playing down a age group wasn’t an option mentioned, and the psychological effects were still a variable missing a more prevalent analysis.

Is this the forward-thinking that Australian football needs to answer the crucial questions of physical development? This move seems like one that is very possibly going in the right direction.

Maybe it’s old-fashioned to reject this idea, though one cannot help but fear the possibility of holding back young players due to their physical ability or the effect it can have on them psychologically.

Football is a sport for all people no matter what their differences, that’s why it has coined the title ‘The Beautiful Game” and that’s something that shouldn’t be taken lightly.

If you wish to learn more click here.

Football Queensland presents 2024-2026 Infrastructure Strategy

Matildas vs France Women's World Cup

Football Queensland has released its new 2024-2026 infrastructure strategy outlining centrally that collaboration with the government will be necessary for infrastructure investment over the next three years.

FQ and Football Australia did quantitative research on community club infrastructure and found the need for millions of dollars worth of infrastructure to support this growth and maintain numbers.

The first point of call is “Unlocking the Legacy of the FWWC23.”

FQ CEO Robert Cavallucci expressed his delight on releasing the Infrastructure Strategy.

“We are delighted to release the 2024-2026 Infrastructure Strategy which builds on our previous 2020 – 2024 Infrastructure Strategy and details our roadmap to securing the vital investment required in our greenspace to build capacity as we work towards achieving our goal of 50/50 gender parity by 2027,” he said via press release.

“Football, as Queensland’s leading team participation sport, continues to grow annually at a double-digit rate, with a staggering 44% surge in female participation (and 29% overall growth) in outdoor players alone in the first quarter of 2024 following the FIFA Women’s World Cup 2023.”

FQ has recorded 300,000 participants with an impressive 65% growth in the last 4 years.

In conjunction with this data, there was a +470% increase in talent pathway athletes and a +330% increase in female participation since 2016.

Also on the national teams, the FQ has a massive role with 50% of the 23FWWC Matildas and Olympic football teams coming through FQ pathways.

Despite these remarkable statistics, looking at it from an infrastructure perspective Robert Cavallucci continues on by saying that football has reached a crisis situation.

“From an infrastructure perspective, based on its continued growth, the game has reached a critical crossroads due to historical underinvestment.”

This struggling infrastructure leads to Challenges such as:

  • Physical and Mental Health Challenges including youth crime.
  • Economic Challenges
  • Reduced Physical Activity
  • Environmental Impact
  • Lack of Opportunities

The study behind this strategy is based on the National Football Facilities Audit Tool.

Provided by the partnership of FQ with Football Australia and another 8 member federations.

It has over 13.5 million data points, providing crucial business intelligence and pinpointing infrastructure gaps for clubs to work on FQ with Football Australia and another 8 member federations introduced the sport’s inaugural.

This data will help FQ in increasing its workforce capabilities with a precise mobilisation of its participation base.

This will be upheld by key campaigns on targeted events and participation, including advocacy within the community to engage with the government and support further education of participants to upgrade the development and quality of personnel.

The Strategy has been broken up into 3 priorities:

Priority 1: State Home of Community Football Pathways

FQ aims to establish a consolidated State Home of Community Football at Meakin Park.

It will significantly contribute to local economic growth and enhance physical and mental well-being through improved facility access, events at various levels (local, state, and national), and community activations.

The benefits:

  • Local economic activity.
  • Supports local sports clubs.
  • Multi-purpose indoor facility access.
  • Community Access.
  • International level training facility.
  • Economic activity through events.

As of December 2023, the estimated cost of this project is $70 million.

Priority 2: Community Football Infrastructure Fund

FQ with the Queensland state government will have a funding model in partnership that would see $20 million per annum invested over an initial three-year period in capacity and capability improvement projects.

Will also advocate for state funding grants for community football, planning for 20 facility improvements annually.

There is a need for large-scale facilities for the lower leagues and training of youth as well as high-performance training facilities in the state.

The benefits:

  • Improved club capacity and capability.
  • Targeted investment (need as opposed to want).
  • Promotes football & Government, co-contribution model.

 Priority 3: Tier 2 Stadium Fit-For-Purpose Stadia

The proposed new 15,000-20,000 seat stadium would be an international state-of-the-art venue tailored for football and a range of events from conferences to concerts.

This would support the commercial viability of the sport, especially the female game and the hosting of the 2032 Brisbane Olympics.

The Benefits:

  • Fit-for-purpose football stadia.
  • Supports professional sports’ economic viability.
  • Promotes Brisbane as a global sports capital.

The estimated cost from December 2023 is 200 million.

The strategy is based on hard evidence, community data and a thorough plan to develop the lacking areas of the game. It does highlight the need for the support of the government, otherwise, the strategy has the potential to struggle.

Overall, however, the outlined process looks promising and with the future AFC2026 and Olympics 2032 competitions, it is an area the government needs to support, and this strategy proves Football Queensland have the dedication and preparation to see it through.

To read through the full 2024-26 Infrastructure Strategy, click here.

Most Popular Topics

Editor Picks

Send this to a friend