A-Leagues commentator Robbie Thomson: “It’s about getting fans passionate and loyal to the product”

Robbie Thomson Commentator

Football commentary serves as our definitive point-of-reference for all of the happenings in a match. Often a commentator assumes multiple roles, including that of a storyteller, guide and veritable ‘hype man’ (or woman) throughout the 90 minutes.

Having previously spent time with beIN SPORTS France as their Ligue 1 World Feed commentator, and also as the World Feed Commentator for Fédération Française de Football (Football Federation France), Canberra-raised Robbie Thomson returned to Australian shores in season 2021-22 to be part of the team covering football at Channel 10.

Throughout an extensive career abroad, Thomson has covered numerous World Cups and has seen his voice broadcast all over the globe. Moreover, Thomson’s years of experience within the world game means he has seen the sport transition from primarily being covered via television, newspaper and radio to taking on a life of its own in the digital age.

Sitting down with Soccerscene ahead of his second season as a lead commentator for Channel 10 and Paramount+, Thomson discussed his career thus far, his learnings from world football, and his anticipation for the A-League Men and Women’s seasons ahead.

In your earlier years, what inspired you to become involved in football broadcasting?

Robbie Thomson: Like with anyone, my dream was to play – not to sit and watch. In the late 1980s when SBS started showing the Italian football on the weekends and production levels started to amp up in the English First Division, I became heavily invested in the game.

We were a whole new generation here in Australia to fall in love with Italian football, which wasn’t unique to us because it was the best league in the world at the time. It had colour; it was well-filmed; and Martin Tyler was commentating there in addition to his work in England. They were great times to be a football fan and probably that is where the seed was planted.

I used to commentate my mates playing soccer games on the arcades, which is where the realisation started that I could mimic the commentators I’d heard on television and perhaps make a career of it.

How did you become involved in Australian football?

Robbie Thomson: Well, it’s not easy to get involved in Australian football. In Canberra, where I grew up and went to University, I played football and wrote match reports for my local club. I went to Melbourne with a bunch of mates and after a year there, a contact had told me that there were part-time jobs going at the Victorian Soccer Federation. I applied for a job which was essentially me calling clubs and answering telephones on Sundays to find out all of the results. That’s how tragic I was at that stage, because I was someone with a degree who by this stage was doing anything just to be involved.

I started meeting people through playing the game down in Melbourne. And then it was David Basheer who was at SBS at the time and was preparing to go to the World Cup for France ’98. SBS had done a lot of work on Italia ’90 and USA ’94 as well, but France ’98 saw a big push from them to get media over there. I’d met David Basheer and he’d taken me under his wing at the time because I knew so much about the NSL – he thought that was odd. And because SBS were so heavily involved in covering the local scene, he gave me a chance. When he went off to France ’98, I took his place on The World Game filing stories during the day. Once he came back, I continued to do anything really.

That was a part-time job and it wasn’t going to lead to anything commentary-wise. So, after a while of having a little taste of what football could do and the jobs that were in it, I packed my bags and headed for Europe.

You’ve spent time all over the world covering football, how significant has your career path been in allowing you to embrace and submerge yourself in global culture? Has football been a catalyst for your journey or was it always your desire to spend time abroad?

Robbie Thomson: I came from an un-football family but it was one that had travelled a lot, being a family of talented ballet dancers who’d travelled overseas as part of companies. As a family we knew that we’d be encouraged to travel and we were fairly open-minded to the world as a result of that. But it was, going back, watching Italian football and seeing the fans that were there – and playing with the Italians, Greeks, and Croatians at my school and at my local clubs in Canberra that really opened my eyes to wanting to travel the world.

It took about 10 years because I moved to France when I was 26. From those first late teen years of falling in love with football, and seeing how international it was, to actually going. I probably would’ve gone to Italy but I had a contact in France where I knew I could stay. From there, I’d always been open to the world and football is a fantastic greeting card and icebreaker.

It’s considered a bit differently perhaps in some parts of Europe. France; it’s not a massive sporting nation and whilst it’s considered culturally significant being that France are world champions, they don’t give it the respect that a fanatical Australian thought they should. In Italy its very much a religion; in Spain its somewhere between the two; in Germany, and even Belgium and the Netherlands, its working class but its really popular; in England its obviously working class and massively popular.

Thomson Ibrahimovic

A lot of your recent football experience has been within French football as you said. What are the strategies and approaches you’ve seen adopted by Ligue 1 and the French Football Federation (FFF) to effectively grow the game there and combat that cultural disconnect?

Robbie Thomson: I’ve worked quite closely with a number of clubs and also with the Ligue de Football Professionnel (LFP) and the FFF in France. I was there in the mid-2000s when the LFP really tried to launch itself internationally. At the time I was basically a one-person news feed in English for French football. I’d write match reports that they’d syndicate to newsrooms around the world and commentary notes for the world feed commentators.

At that time the LFP split from FFF and that’s when they started seeing the necessity to start producing English language content. The LFP have been taking their Community Shield equivalent (the Trophée des Champions) overseas for the best part of a decade. The last two were in Israel but I’ve been to Montreal, Tunisia, Morocco, Gabon and all over the place – usually to French-speaking countries or countries with French links.

The FFF have been a little bit slower on the uptake by comparison despite hosting something like EURO 2016 which was a great platform for them. Even though they’ve had teams that have won the World Cup in 98 and 2018 and were a finalist in 2006, it took them years to get their website into English. Basically, like Italy and Spain (outside of Real or Barça), they were years behind and missed that boat. The Bundesliga and Premier League were the frontrunners and AS Roma were the odd exception who got on top of it.

Social media is a huge thing and I think there’s a bit of reticence in Europe towards completely changing the game and the communication around it. There’s a fear that you’re losing your identity and traditions if you’re changing times to reach different markets. There’s a struggle from loyalists to maintain their fervour and passion for the clubs, but the next generation will carry that on in a different way.

Almost 10 years prior to re-joining the A-Leagues banner as a commentator, your voice was heard during the 2011/12 and 2012/13 seasons when Fox Sports owned the broadcasting rights. What do you feel has changed between that period and now?

Robbie Thomson: It’s clearly been through a difficult period. In my absence I kept sort of abreast of what was going on and had former colleagues that were back here. By all accounts the split between FA and APL was very complicated and bitter, and it certainly appears that we’re still feeling the effects of the split because it seemingly was acrimonious. There was so much energy left on the battlefield that now people are struggling to pick themselves up and move forward again.

10 years ago, there was still Frank Lowy and a centralised power and I didn’t think much of this at the time. But clearly in the absence you see now – and not necessarily of Frank Lowy but of someone of a presence and strong leadership with influence – it’s crucial for a sport (and we’re not the only sport obviously) – we’re a sport that needed to have that influence just because we’re up against sports where clearly its in their best interests to keep football small and underdeveloped.

So, that’s the biggest change I think that I can see. Soccer was and is the victim of the fact that it’s not Fairfax Channel 9 or Murdoch News Corp realms. And you can’t compete in the national psyche if you have no presence and if you have no voice. It’s nearly impossible to get any airtime, but it needs a shot in the arm and to not have COVID and the terrible weather that blighted last season. We need to have a good season of football, we need to have a pause and a rewind button, and we need to have people get behind it and somehow try to translate participation numbers and a clear love of European football into a love of domestic football. For kids and adults that are playing they need to see that there’s A-League on – Men and Women – and that it’s worth watching.

As someone who has commentated on and soaked in football from around the world, what are the points of difference between the A-Leagues and football elsewhere?

Robbie Thomson: Well, there are the structural compositions that are obviously different when positioning the A-Leagues in Australian society, because football is a sport but its not the same as an individual sport like golf or tennis, a football team like a rugby league or AFL team represents a community, an area, a city, or a people, and carries their identity. And that’s the thing that’s the hardest to create in Australia.

Perhaps we could look more at how it’s been done in Japan and the USA rather than Europe or South America where the football clubs have been around for over 120 years, because they have a different anchorage in the society and the community. Not talking promotion-relegation, salary caps, structural league differences… the biggest difference in Europe, South America, Africa and football around the world to Australia is that the clubs here are very much a franchise in so far as there is not enough anchorage in community.

There’s not enough identity with the clubs. And maybe that’s a question of time, we’re going into our 18th year and we know that certain clubs do have an identity; that Sydney FC have an identity; Melbourne Victory; the Mariners, it’s more difficult with clubs such as Newcastle who don’t have a solid owner. Brisbane Roar have been cut off from their community; Perth fans when they lose their home ground for a while will feel disconnected; Adelaide has a good identity but could still be stronger. For me, that’s the big difference in terms of cultural importance to a country, that’s where the A-League is lacking.

APL
Image provided by Australian Professional Leagues.

The A-Leagues have stepped up their content production in the off-season with video season previews and the arrival of the A-Leagues All Access series which is a first of its kind. Can you give us some insight into the motivation behind this content?

Robbie Thomson: To connect. The whole idea is to try and connect to the fans and to the future fans that are coming through, to the young fans that are all across social media. I think that the A-Leagues would’ve tried to run it last season but there was so much putting out fires that it was difficult to get everything up and running.

This weekly behind-the-scenes, ‘Drive to Survive’ all-access style show has been planned since day one. And the idea is we have to consolidate the fans we have. Social media is very pervasive in the world – everyone has a mobile phone and a content device and more and more people are using them – and this is a great way of reaching them. If we can do young, funky, cool content that sounds interesting with video clips that look more and more like the Premier League or European football then it will naturally grow interest.

I doubt very much that Formula One would’ve anticipated the success of ‘Drive to Survive’. In France the ratings for Formula One were through the roof the year after the show’s debut. And Formula One was dying because people saw it as the cars drive themselves. There were no characters, it was seen as this pristine thing that no one could actually relate to in the end. This documentary created all of this underbelly and made people intrigued, and that’s the idea of A-Leagues All Access to make sure we’re consolidating the fans we have now and connecting with the young fans take us into the next decade.

There’s a real desire to ensure that the support content is as high quality as anywhere in the world because there’s no reason it can’t be. We can get more access here than we can say Paris St. Germain players to do this type of thing. And in all honesty, our players are not at the level of Ronaldo, Messi, Haaland or Mbappé, but the football last season was entertaining. It’s just that people didn’t give it a chance or didn’t know it was on. So, if we can shine a light on it and connect with the young fans and bring a few people through the gates, then the football doesn’t need help. It’s about getting fans passionate and loyal to the product.

Previous ArticleNext Article

South Melbourne’s A-League dream is still a bridge too far

The A-League has just lost a Victorian club. The death of Western United and the suspension of its license by the Australian Professional Leagues (APL) on August 10th was inevitable. The club says it wants to rebuild and eventually return to the competition. That is unlikely to happen considering the search for new owners has to begin.

But one day after the announcement from Western United, South Melbourne stepped forward. The four-time NSL winners announced their intention to begin formal discussions with the APL about joining the A-Leagues. They believe the timing is right. Their argument is understandable. Their football credentials and history are stronger than most A-League teams.

But there is a problem. South Melbourne may have the history. It may have the supporters. It may even have one of the most attractive potential derbies in Australian football. But that does not mean it will get an A-League licence.

In fact, the more realistic prediction from my perspective is that South Melbourne will once again be told no.

South Melbourne has never been better placed

There is plenty to like about South Melbourne’s position. The club is not simply relying on its history. South Melbourne returned to national competition through the inaugural Australian Championship in 2025. It did not merely participate. South Melbourne won it. The club defeated Marconi Stallions 2-0 in the final to become the competition’s first champion.

That achievement matters. The Australian Championship was created to bridge state-based football and the professional game. Whilst it is seen as a second tier, there is no promotion and relegation with the A-League. But it has also continued to perform on the national stage. In the 2026 Australia Cup, which South Melbourne qualified for, they reached the final rounds and then produced one of the biggest results of the tournament.

Adelaide United came to Lakeside Stadium. South Melbourne won 2-1. Adelaide had won the Australia Cup three times. South knocked them out in front of its own supporters. They’re now into the quarter-finals of the 2026 Australia Cup.

South Melbourne celebrating the Australian Championship Image Credits: South Melbourne FC

The club also has a much bigger story to tell than its recent results. Alongside its four NSL victories, the club also won the 1999 Oceania Club Championship and represented Oceania at the 2000 FIFA Club World Championship. The club has a dedicated supporter base and the history to deserve a place.

The club says its Oceania Professional League participation has helped make it Australia’s 13th professional football club. It has more than 150 businesses supporting it in 2026 and a long-term arrangement at Lakeside Stadium, in the heart of South Melbourne.

On the football side, it wants to continue competing in the NPL, Australian Championship and Oceania competition even if it enters the A-Leagues. It also has lofty ambitions to introduce an A-League women’s side.

On paper, it is difficult to argue that South Melbourne is not ready. The problem is that readiness and admission are two different things.

Third time’s the charm?

South Melbourne’s current push is not new. It has been here before. The club was pursuing an A-League return almost immediately after the NSL disappeared. In 2007, South announced its interest in becoming the second Victorian A-League club.

Then came the 2008-09 process. South Melbourne backed the Southern Cross bid for the second Victorian licence. The club proposed a new team based around the redevelopment of Bob Jane Stadium and involvement from the broader Victorian football community.

It lost. The Melbourne Heart bid won the race and eventually became Melbourne City. That was South Melbourne’s first major warning. Its football heritage was not enough. Its second major attempt came almost a decade later.

The 2017-18 expansion process produced the most serious South Melbourne bid yet. South made the shortlist for an expanded A-League licence. It ultimately lost to Western United. Bill Papastergiadis has since explained that he did not genuinely expect South Melbourne to win in 2018, despite believing strongly that the club belonged in the A-League. He also reflected on the barriers facing a traditional club trying to enter the existing Victorian professional football ecosystem.

That is important context for today’s bid. South Melbourne is not entering negotiations without understanding how difficult the politics and economics of the Victorian football market can be. The club has tried the direct route twice. Neither time worked.

The Western United lesson

This is where the current situation becomes complicated. In isolation, adding South Melbourne would be fantastic for the A-League. Imagine South Melbourne against Melbourne Victory. The atmosphere would be enormous.

There is a genuine football rivalry waiting to happen. South itself points to the potential for ready-made derbies and commercial interest. But the argument that Melbourne should simply have three A-League clubs because Melbourne is a huge city ignores what has just happened to Western United.

Western United was supposed to represent Melbourne’s rapidly growing west. Its original vision centred on a major project in Geelong. The club eventually moved into Ironbark Fields in Tarneit in 2024.

Yet the geographic separation never became as clear as the original concept suggested. Western United was not a Geelong club. It was not a regional Victorian club in the traditional sense. It was a western Melbourne club based and that matters.

The A-League already has Melbourne City and Melbourne Victory. Adding South Melbourne would give the competition three clubs operating within the same metropolitan football market. It is not necessarily brilliant for the business model, which has already lost a club operating on the outskirts of Melbourne.

The NSL offers an interesting historical comparison. The Falcons provide an even more striking Victorian example. They became the first and only regional Victorian club to play in the NSL, reaching the finals in 1996. The distinction is important.

A national competition can expand its footprint by adding genuinely new markets. That is different from adding another club inside an existing Melbourne metropolitan market. That was what was envisioned for Western United, and it failed quickly.

Will the APL see South Melbourne as a safe investment? Despite the fact they’re a well-established club, I’d argue the answer is no.

Promotion and relegation is the only realistic route

There is one scenario where South Melbourne could eventually force its way into the A-League, and that’s the great missing piece of Australian football. Promotion and relegation. South Melbourne would not need somebody to decide that Melbourne suddenly has room for another licence. It would simply need to earn it.

They would have done just that in 2025, winning the Australian Championship if the football pyramid was open. Football Australia originally designed the National Second Tier with the possibility of promotion and relegation being considered once the competition matured.

The format connects NPL clubs and established foundation clubs with national competition. It does not provide a sporting pathway into the A-League. South Melbourne can win the Australian Championship, NSL and Australia Cup but none of those achievements automatically produce an A-League licence.

South Melbourne in the Oceania Championship Image Credits: Oceania Championship

Opening the pyramid is far more complicated than simply announcing promotion and relegation. Australia’s football calendar is fragmented. The A-League operates primarily through the summer months. The NPL operates through the winter and early spring. For the 2026-27 season, the A-League Men runs from October to June, while the NPL begins in February and finishes in September.

That creates an enormous structural problem for a fully connected pyramid. The clubs below the A-League would need to operate at a level capable of supporting professional football. If the A-League aligned with the NPL and the lower pyramid, it would compete in a football calendar that already has to coexist with Australia’s other major winter sports. That is a difficult feat against bigger leagues such as the AFL and NRL.

Beyond that, clubs lower down would need travel budgets and to survive commercially would take real sacrifice from all parties to make that work. The A-League’s existing clubs also have something to lose. They have invested heavily in their licences and their businesses.

Historically, A-League licences were extended through to 2034, while those licence arrangements have included provisions allowing promotion and relegation to be introduced. But the existing clubs will do everything in their power to block it. Promotion and relegation removes certainty. An A-League club can finish last in the current system with no threat to their place. Under relegation, its place is no longer guaranteed.

That is a major commercial change for clubs that have invested in securing their position in the competition. It is therefore difficult to imagine the A-League opening the door. The A-League’s licensing system gives the competition enormous control over who enters, and for South Melbourne historically they’ve been left out in the cold.

South Melbourne deserves the conversation.

The frustrating part is South Melbourne has probably never had a stronger argument. It has history, supporters, infrastructure, commercial support and most importantly, ambition. Beating A-League clubs in national competition proves the capability is there.

It deserves to be in the conversation. But being in the conversation is not the same as being selected. The Western United experience should be a warning. If the A-League could not make the Western United project work, it is difficult to see why it would suddenly decide that another Melbourne club is the answer.

South Melbourne may be the better football story. It may even be the better football club. But the A-League is not simply selecting the best football story.

It is selecting a professional competition, and until Australia embraces a genuine promotion and relegation system, South Melbourne’s path back to the top flight will remain dependent on someone handing it a licence.

That is the part of the dream that looks unrealistic. South Melbourne can keep knocking and it should. They always say third time’s the charm. But unless the pyramid is opened, I expect the door to remain closed.

APL and PFA remain without agreement as bargaining tensions continue

The Australian Professional Leagues (APL) and Professional Footballers Australia (PFA) remain without a new collective bargaining agreement, with negotiations continuing less than three months before the start of the 2026–27 A-Leagues season.

The APL presented the players’ union with a new one-year interim proposal on August 5, which included an increase to the A-League Women salary cap and a commitment to establish a pathway towards full-time professionalism for the women’s competition within 12 months.

The proposed agreement would provide an interim framework while the two parties continue discussions over a longer-term collective bargaining agreement.

APL chief executive Steve Rosich said the proposal reflected the league’s commitment to reaching a sustainable agreement with players following eight months of negotiations.

However, the PFA criticised the APL for publicly announcing the proposal shortly after presenting it to the union, arguing that the approach had further damaged trust between the two parties.

PFA Chief Executive Beau Busch also said players had overwhelmingly rejected the APL’s previous final offer, citing a lack of trust in the league’s ability to ensure its future.

Full-time professionalism for the A-League Women remains a key priority for the PFA, with players seeking improved conditions and greater investment in the competition.

The A-League Men and A-League Women seasons are both scheduled to begin on 16 October 2026.

With the new season approaching, both parties face pressure to resolve the dispute and establish the framework governing player conditions across the A-Leagues.

 

 

Most Popular Topics

Editor Picks

Send this to a friend