It’s time for Craig Johnston

Craig Johnston

Since 2017, after spending many years in the U.S.A., Craig Johnston – our most decorated footballer with eight medals from his years at Liverpool F.C. – has been based in his hometown Newcastle.

The man who ventured to Middlesborough in 1975 at the tender age of 15 survived the harsh treatment of Jackie Charlton to make his first team debut at the age of 17 and was transferred for a record 650,000 pounds to Liverpool in 1981.

This was the example of his never say die attitude and created a lasting benchmark for many players who followed him.

Critically, Johnston has never lost his passion for the game and if ever there was a time for him to influence the course of Australian football, it is now.

In this interview with Roger Sleeman, Johnston espouses his views on the direction Australian football should be taking.

ROGER SLEEMAN

You’ve been back in Australia since 2017.

What was your plan to integrate your ideas into the Australian footballing landscape?

CRAIG JOHNSTON

I spent a long time travelling the world and after 20 years living in the U.S.A., I wanted to return home to impact player development, coaching and merchandising.

R.S.

How far have you succeeded in your intentions?

C.J.

I’ve spent every waking minute trying to get kids to play football more often.

I’ve made a lot of progress but it hasn’t been an easy task because the same difficulties exist as before.

This is because we live in a wonderful country with so many options to educate and entertain our kids.

There is a perceived public opinion that football is the sleeping giant in Australian sport but I believe the Women’s World Cup will finally awake the sleeping giant.

R.S.

There are a distinct lack of technical players produced in our country, evidenced by the quality of A-League and NPL competitions.

What are your observations?

C.J.

It’s exactly as it’s always been, that if you can’t trap or pass a ball it’s going to be difficult to succeed in football.

Back in the day of the Golden Generation and before, you had sons and daughters of first generation immigrants playing every day in their backyards, as their parents did in their countries.

Therefore, we have to be more innovative to take the kids of today away from their PlayStation and modify their short-term span of concentration.

The kids have to be enticed out of their bedrooms from their PlayStation and shoot up games.

They must be touching the ball more often and it has to become the new toy in their life just like the previous generations.

Image credit: David Cannon /Allsport

R.S.

Do we have the right people holding down technical roles to improve skill factors for youth players?

C.J.

I don’t know these people, but whoever they are, have they got the data to show they’ve improved the skills of young players, or for that matter any data at all?

R.S.

Our recent demise from the u/17 Asian Cup was largely attributed to lack of preparation.

Your comment?

C.J.

Our Asian neighbours have improved so much that the biggest threat is from them, not Europe or South America.

The Asians have approached development in a scientific way by using global currency as a way of being recognised on a global scale while the Australian government ignores it.

In contrast, the Saudis, South Koreans and Japanese are going ahead in leaps and bounds.

R.S.

You returned to Europe last May to watch Liverpool in the Champions League Final in Paris and stayed there a further five months.

What did you achieve in that time?

C.J.

I was involved with a Belgium broadcaster who was producing a documentary on the Heysel Stadium disaster of 1985.

Ironically, there was a riot between the opposing supporters in Paris and despite all the money invested in security, they still haven’t got it right.

I also met officials from FIFA and UEFA about the proposed Super League and expressed my disagreement with the proposal.

Basically, I believed the big clubs were going to take the game away from the supporters and monetise it through a closed shop and franchise model which would’ve resulted in splitting the game in two.

If the Super League had gone ahead it would’ve resulted in 12 owners dominating the game in Europe, mainly from American roots.

What football means to a Mancunian or Scouser doesn’t equate with the perception of an American business tycoon.

R.S.

You’ve been in talks with Northern NSW Football for some time.

Can you outline the progress of these discussions?

C.J.

As a proud Novocastrian, I was involved with previous regimes and the Dutch coaches in raising $9 million dollars to set up an Academy

However, the Dutch never allowed me to get inside the gates because they claimed it was their job to coach skills, and not mine.

Finally, I have an opportunity because of the new Board and the new CEO.

I’m also talking to the Jets and Lake Macquarie club where I played in my formative years.

One of my biggest ambitions is to pass on the secrets of my success which enabled me to leave Lake Macquarie and play first team football in Middlesborough at the age of 17.

R.S.

When will the powers that be engage you to make a significant contribution to the game by improving the development of youth players?

C.J.

I’ve experienced the fame and recognition so its best to have your own clever thoughts to provide solutions.

They know I’m here and they’re all aware of my success so I only have to be tapped on the shoulder.

R.S.

What is your take on the Women’s World Cup and how it can impact the game in Australia?

C.J.

It’s the best thing to happen for Australian football, just as England winning the European Women’s Championship has boosted women’s football in their country.

I well remember when I was living in the States and Bill Clinton was running for President and he was asked who would decide the election victory?

He answered the “soccer mums” because they run round all the week organising their children’s sport and they are the backbone of the nation.

They are a huge audience and they spend the money which will contribute to football’s success.

R.S.

Will you be speaking to Rob Stanton, the new Jets coach?

C.J.

I’ve already had talks with the CEO, Shane Mattiske, to arrange a meeting with Stanton.

R.S.

What is the progress of your concept of the Big Bash of Soccer?

C.J.

Based on the Big Bash of Cricket, plans are moving forward to introduce a pre-season tournament before the A-League season.

We plan to have eight A-League teams and eight NPL teams playing in one-hour matches, consisting of four quarters.

The aim is to produce a new culture, skills and most importantly entertainment.

There will be high scores on a reduced pitch with six players per side.

Players will receive a yellow card if they play the ball backwards and a red card the second time.

On receipt of the red card, the player will be placed in the sin bin for two minutes.

The TV coverage will encourage young players to play Little Bash at school and on training pitches.

Ultimately, I believe this format can be successful like its cricket counterpart.

Previous ArticleNext Article

The A-Leagues Final Series important status also a secret hinderance

The Isuzu A-League finals series is a huge event in the footballing calendar, though its contribution to stagnant attendance numbers in the league is something to be said.

If the 2025/26 finals series follows similar patterns to those before it, it will gather huge traction and strong ticket sales.

It is the largest event for the domestic league, bringing in massive amounts of viewership through media and gate receipts.

Finals series from years past have shown this, with the 2024/25 final, a Melbourne derby, being sold out within 48 hours and gathering significant viewership online.

The idea of a finals series lies within the Australian sporting ethos; the other sporting codes have had this tradition for most of their existence, especially in recent history.

Football, though, is different from the rest of the sporting codes in Australia, unique even. This has historically contributed to its inability to integrate into the same supported status as other codes.

Many in the Australian footballing community, supporter groups, players, coaches, and even the new Director of Football Australia, have voiced concerns over fan numbers in the league competition.

It wouldn’t be absurd to say that maybe, though profitable now, the finals series is actually taking away from the league itself.

Consider the media image: the league winner is called the “minor premiership,” and ticket sales and viewership figures reveal a huge disparity between the two parts of the A-League.

It must be said that an alternative that could work in unison with the league and possibly increase viewership of the league itself would be a great advantage.

It would allow the league to gain more jeopardy and drama, which could build greater interest in attending league games.

One alternative is already here.

No other sporting code in Australia has both a league competition and a cup competition. Football in Australia does.

The Hahn’s Australia Cup is our equivalent to the FA Cup in England or the Copa del Rey in Spain.

These are competitions that offer a finals option in a different competition entirely. They generate huge traction while never diminishing the importance of the league and, therefore, its popularity.

These cup competitions cannot be discussed without acknowledging some obvious differences.

They don’t face the same popularity issues that football does in Australia. It’s obvious the Hahn’s Australia Cup doesn’t yet gain the traction that the finals series does.

However, for a healthy footballing environment with increasing fan numbers, it should.

The idea of elevating the Hahn’s Australia Cup and scaling back the finals series is a complex question, one that is treated like a “no-go zone” by many in the Australian footballing community, and that is understandable.

Though big changes like this might, in the end, be credible options for the future of the sport in this country.

Larger plans must be set in motion, strategies that can be worked towards and refined along the way. It is the process by which all large organisations, business models and even national governments build their strategies.

Such a shift will be scrutinised and pushed back against.

Though with further fine-tuning and smart investment in development, not to mention the introduction of promotion and relegation and the possibility of changing the footballing calendar.

It could replicate the success that these two-competition models already enjoy in other leagues.

The added importance that the premiership would gain, the reality that every game matters, could alongside other strategies entice fans to more games, increase viewership and ticket sales, and create more dedicated fan bases. It works in other nations, very well in fact.

The possibility of two teams lifting a trophy, rather than one single event defining it all, sounds like a strategy that could deliver more engagement over longer periods of time.

Maybe Australian football doesn’t need to answer this question just yet. It is complex, difficult and it would require a great deal of work, including significant investment into the game, which is another issue entirely.

Yet as low attendance numbers persist in the A-League, even alongside increased media viewership, something needs to change for football in Australia.

The rise in popularity of this game and its dedicated community deserves bold ideas and forward thinking.

Ideas like this could eventually begin to change the landscape of the beautiful game in Australia for the better.

Media Mega-Mergers, Minor Leagues: Why Global Consolidation Should Be a Wake-Up Call for Australian Football

The approval of a reported $113 billion merger between Warner Bros. Discovery and Paramount Global is being framed as the creation of a “next-generation media and entertainment company.”

But beyond Hollywood headlines, the deal signals something far more consequential for sport: a global media landscape rapidly consolidating into fewer, more powerful hands.

For Australian football, particularly the A-League, this is not just background noise. It is a structural shift that could define the league’s future.

 

A shrinking marketplace, a growing imbalance

The merger brings together an enormous portfolio of assets, such as film studios, broadcast networks and streaming platforms, under a single corporate umbrella. It reflects a broader industry trend: scale is no longer an advantage in media, it is a necessity.

Yet with that scale comes concentration. Fewer buyers now control more platforms, more audiences, and more capital. Critics of the deal have warned that such consolidation risks reducing competition and narrowing the range of voices in global media.

For sport, the implications are immediate.

Broadcast rights are no longer negotiated in a diverse, competitive market. Instead, leagues are increasingly competing for space within vertically integrated media ecosystems. This is because decisions are driven not just by audience demand, but by global strategy, bundled content offerings and long-term platform growth.

 

Why the A-League is particularly exposed

This shift lands unevenly across the sporting landscape.

Leagues like the Australian Football League (AFL) and National Rugby League (NRL) remain dominant domestic products, commanding billion-dollar broadcast deals and consistent mass audiences.

The A-League, by contrast, operates from a more fragile commercial base.

Despite its global game status, the league continues to face:

  • Inconsistent crowd figures
  • Fluctuating visibility
  • A comparatively modest broadcast deal with Paramount

In a fragmented media environment, this is manageable. In a consolidated one, it becomes a vulnerability.

Because as the number of broadcasters shrinks, so too does the margin for leagues that are not seen as “must-have” content.

 

From open market to closed ecosystem

The critical shift is not just economic, it is also structural.

In the past, leagues could leverage competition between broadcasters to drive rights value. Now, with fewer but larger players, the balance of power tilts toward the platforms.

Content is no longer simply acquired, it is curated.

And in that environment, only properties that deliver one (or more) of the following will thrive:

  • Guaranteed audiences
  • Global scalability
  • Year-round engagement
  • Strategic value within a broader content ecosystem

This is where the A-League faces both its greatest challenge—and its greatest opportunity.

 

The overlooked strength of Australian football

While often positioned as a “developing” product domestically, football offers something no other Australian code can replicate: global alignment.

As the world’s most popular sport, football operates within an international ecosystem that extends far beyond national borders. Australia’s geographic position, bridging Asian and Western markets, adds further strategic value.

For a global media entity like Paramount, this matters.

The A-League is not just local content. It is potentially exportable, scalable and aligned with global football narratives. It also taps into younger, more digitally engaged audiences, who are increasingly driving subscription-based streaming growth.

In a media environment defined by platform expansion, that is not a weakness. It is an underutilised asset.

 

Why consolidation should drive MORE investment

The instinct in a consolidating market is often caution by tightening budgets, focusing on proven performers and minimising risk.

But for Australian football, that approach is self-defeating.

Because without investment:

  • Production quality stagnates
  • Storytelling weakens
  • Audience growth plateaus
  • Commercial value declines

And in a system that rewards scale and engagement, stagnation is equivalent to irrelevance.

Instead, consolidation should be seen as a trigger for strategic investment:

  • Elevating broadcast presentation
  • Strengthening club identities and narratives
  • Expanding digital and streaming integration
  • Positioning the league within the broader global football conversation

In short, making the A-League indispensable, rather than optional.

 

The real risk: being left behind

The emergence of media giants like a merged Warner Bros. Discovery and Paramount Global signals a future where content is filtered through fewer, more powerful gatekeepers.

In that world, leagues that fail to assert their value risk being sidelined, not because they lack potential, but because they fail to meet the evolving demands of the platforms that distribute them.

For the A-League, the danger is not collapse. It is marginalisation.

A slow drift into irrelevance while larger codes capture the attention, investment, and audiences that define modern sport.

 

Conclusion: a defining moment

This merger is not about Hollywood. It is about power.

Power over distribution. Power over audiences. Power over what gets seen and what does not.

For Australian football, the message is clear.

In a world of media consolidation, visibility is earned through value, not assumed through presence.

And if the A-League is to secure its place in that future, investment is no longer optional.

It is existential.

Most Popular Topics

Editor Picks

Send this to a friend