Attendance and Atmosphere: Maximising the A-League’s potential

While many A-League clubs boast some of the most impressive sporting venues in Australia, maximising their potential and drawing in consistently high attendances has remained challenging. As highlighted in the PFA ALM Report 2024-25, only three clubs – Auckland FC, Adelaide United and Western United – reached over 50% of stadium capacity on an average matchday. 

There is a clear infrastructure problem facing the A-League – so how can we tackle it?

Attendance trends in the ALM

Attendance issues and questions over stadia utilisation were revealed in the PFA ALM Report released in November 2025. The findings showed that, were it not for the introduction of Auckland FC and their impressive crowds throughout the season, average attendance in the A-league would have marginally decreased from the previous season. 

Five A-League clubs also saw their attendances fall last season, including Western Sydney Wanderers, Wellington Phoenix, Central Coast Mariners, Perth Glory and Melbourne City. Of these, Melbourne City saw the largest drop off with a decrease of 27%. 

While Auckland should be commended with their ability to attract league-high crowds in their debut A-league season, it must be acknowledged that such reliance on one club to bring up the numbers is not enough. If the league is to continue growing in the years to come, we should encourage all clubs to make efforts to bring local support from the community into the stadium. 

 

A ‘less is more’ approach?

Planning how to maximise stadia potential and utilise facilities effectively will be vital in future seasons. Unfortunately, the discussions which began at the turn of the millenium with the PFA’s 2002 blueprint ‘For the Fans’, has largely failed to materialise into concrete plans of action. 

The blueprint called for smaller-sized, soccer-specific stadia able to hold 10,000-15,000 fans. In the past 24 years since the blueprint, not a single stadium of this nature has been built. Instead, as the report explains, stadia capacities across the league have excessively increased and strayed beyond the ‘Goldilocks zone’.

Consequently, many clubs have struggled to follow ambitious stadium upgrades with consistently high matchday attendances. For example, of the A-League venues with a capacity of over 30,000, none of them managed to achieve a utilisation rate of over 50% in the 2024-25 season.

In comparison, 22 of the 27 MLS clubs with a stadium capacity of 18,000 to 30,000 achieved a utilisation rate of 79% in 2024, and over half almost always achieved sell-out crowds. It proves that, if clubs want to attract supporters and create intense matchday atmospheres, constructing high-capacity stadiums isn’t always the answer.

Reducing the ‘gap’ between players and supporters

The benefit to ‘soccer-specific’ stadia is that the distance between players and supporters is both physically and figuratively reduced.

“Compact grounds intensify the atmosphere from a given number of people and, close to their limits, create a scarcity factor that drives sustainable support regardless of results or other conditions,” the report explains.  

By having ‘Goldilocks zone’ capacities in purpose-built stadia, home supporters are brought closer to the action and feel more immersed in the matchday experience. As fan engagement grows and attendances increase, clubs can maximise ticket sales, creating new avenues for merchandising and unique matchday experiences to continue establishing connections with local and loyal supporters. 

Multi-purpose, high-capacity venues can rarely match the intense atmospheres and physical proximity provided by a smaller stadium. In this way, building soccer-specific stadia can help fans feel a true sense of unity between themselves and the players, leading to distinct club identities and a contagious passion for the game as a whole.

And as football fans all know, catching the football-fever bug is nearly impossible to shake off. 

 

Is there still cause to be optimistic?

The A-Leagues are at a turning point in 2026. As a new era begins under the guidance of recently-appointed CEO, Steve Rosich, it is vital that questions are addressed over stadium utilisation and fan engagement. But while many may look abroad for inspiration, it is also important to remember what football fans in Australia are already capable of.

In the 2016/17 season, the Sydney Derby saw an incredible 61,880 fans packed into Stadium Australia, a feat which still stands as the record attendance for an A-League game. The very same fixture took place last weekend, drawing in over 33,000 fans to the Allianz Stadium, more than double their average attendance last year according to PFA Men’s Report (15,282).

It is evident that, when it comes to finding passionate fans of the beautiful game, Australia certainly isn’t lacking. The key, however, will be to ensure that all A-League clubs have the appropriate infrastructure to engage with these fans and maximise their valuable support. 

A stadium is far more than a commercial venue – it is a place for fans to come together and find a collective identity and voice. Perhaps, however, it should be remembered that a stadium with 10,000 filled seats is far more influential than a stadium with 40,000 empty.

 

Previous ArticleNext Article

More Than One in Five Football Australia Staff to Lose Jobs Amid Growing Financial Losses

Australian football finds itself in a curious position.

From the outside, the game appears to be riding a wave of momentum. Attendances, visibility and public interest have all experienced significant uplift in recent years, while major international tournaments and growing discussion around football’s future continue to place the sport firmly within the national conversation.

Yet behind that momentum, Football Australia is now confronting a far more challenging internal reality.

 

A compounding deficit

Chief Executive Martin Kugeler has reportedly indicated the governing body’s projected financial losses for 2025 are expected to exceed the organisation’s reported $8.5 million deficit from the previous year. Accompanying the financial outlook are substantial organisational changes, with reporting from Tracey Holmes indicating more than one in five Football Australia employees are expected to lose their positions through restructuring measures.

The figures represent more than a difficult balance sheet. They point toward a significant period of recalibration inside the organisation responsible for overseeing the sport nationally.

 

Losing the wisdom of existing staff members

For governing bodies, restructures are often framed as strategic necessities for future sustainability. However, workforce changes on this scale also raise broader questions around the challenges of such a transition.

People are often the carriers of knowledge, relationships and long-term strategic understanding. When organisations undergo significant structural change, the effects can extend beyond immediate financial outcomes.

 

Contradicting timing

The timing is what makes the developments particularly notable.

Football in Australia has spent recent years discussing expansion, growth and long-term opportunity. The conversation surrounding the game has increasingly centred on future potential. Often headlining stronger pathways, larger audiences, infrastructure development and greater visibility.

Against that backdrop, news of deep financial losses and substantial staffing reductions creates a different conversation: one focused not on where the game wants to go, but on what may be required to sustain that journey. Therefore, this announcement points toward stagnancy, rather than growth.

Further detail surrounding Football Australia’s strategy and long-term direction will likely emerge over coming months. For now, the developments serve as a reminder that growth stories are rarely straightforward.

Often, the periods that appear strongest from the outside can also be the moments organisations face their most significant internal tests.

Heidelberg United denied qualification to AFC UCL 2

In an announcement made yesterday, Football Australia revealed that, in place of Heidelberg United, Melbourne Victory will now take the AFC UCL 2 spot.

A premature ending

In what is sure to be a disappointing verdict for Heidelberg’s fans, staff and supporters, the NPL VIC side will no longer compete in next season’s AFC CL 2.

The decision comes despite Heidelberg meeting the necessary criteria outlined in Football Australia’s National Club Licensing Regulations.

“We understand that this will be a disappointing outcome for everyone connected to Heidelberg United FC,” said FA Executive Director of Football, Heather Garriock, via press release.

“The club earned enormous respect through its performances this season and should be proud of what it achieved both on and off the pitch.”

Indeed, through defeating several A-League outfits en-route to the Australia Cup Final against Newcastle Jets, Heidelberg did earn widespread respect and admiration across the landscape. Football Australia also strongly advocated for the side’s place in the AFC CL 2 following Newcastle’s qualification to the AFC CL Elite.

But despite the determined efforts of the club’s board to meet all necessary criteria, the Asian Football Confederation (AFC) ruled the side ineligible to compete.

 

Victory emerge as replacements

Filling the now-vacant position in next season’s competition is Melbourne Victory, who finished 4th in the A-League this year.

As 3rd-place Auckland FC are based in New Zealand, thus falling under the Oceania Football Confederation (OFC), they are also ineligible to compete.

So while the AFC CL 2 will still be arriving in Melbourne next season, fixtures will no longer be built on the underdog success story of Heidelberg’s immense rise from NPL to AFC CL matchdays.

The club, however, will appeal the decision, and has written to Football Australia for further clarity on the Appeals Process.

It remains uncertain whether the appeal will be successful or not, but Heidelberg will undoubtedly enjoy the backing not just of its own staff and supporters, but of the entire Australian grassroots community.

Most Popular Topics

Editor Picks

Send this to a friend