US investment could strip European football of traditional values

Since its inception, football has remained fundamentally Eurocentric in both its structure and cultural dominance.

As football expanded from England into Western Europe, foundational institutions such as IFAB, FIFA, and UEFA were formed under established European models of governance, cultural traditions and sporting philosophy.

However, a transatlantic threat in the form of American involvement in boardroom negotiations, network acquisitions, and media rights portfolios looms over these European models.

A subtle but systemic Americanisation of football is now underway, with American capital inserting itself into European football more than ever.

As of the 2025/26 season, 10 of the 20 Premier League clubs, 9 of the 20 Serie A clubs, and a quarter of Ligue 1 clubs are majority US-owned.

This year, American investors have been involved in 19 of the 30 ownership transactions recorded in Europe.

Even lower-league clubs and merging football markets are becoming increasingly targeted by US investors in pursuit of undervalued assets with high growth potential.

Growing transatlantic interest in football extends beyond investors. The US Government utilises sport, especially football, as a geopolitical tool for projecting American power and identity.

Chelsea’s victory and subsequent trophy-lift featuring Donald Trump at the US-hosted 2025 Club World Cup offers the most visible example yet.

The Trump administrations use of sport as a platform for political messaging and national branding highlights the inseparability of sport and politics.

Implications of increased US involvement

US capital is normalising and enforcing operations that contradict traditional European models.

Investors are partaking in multi-club ownership to create operational efficiencies across player transfers, global brand development and content dissemination.

This goes against the values of local identity and member governance that constitute traditional club ownership models.

A report published by the International Centre for Sports Studies highlights the rising prevalence of multi-club ownership in the ten European leagues it examined.

A total of 78 multi-club ownership investments were finalised between 2019 and 2023.

Close to 40% of the 341 clubs analysed in the report were directly connected to another football club through shared ownership.

Moreover, European leagues are experiencing the introduction of profit-driven, scalable business models inspired by American sports.

It is global brand building and revenue maximisation strategies like this that are replacing traditional European models.

Governing bodies have already faced challenges surrounding American investment, which now extends beyond individual clubs and encompasses entire commercial frameworks.

Most recently, UEFA was forced to deny Crystal Palace entry into the Europa League due to ownership conflicts involving American shareholder John Textor, who at the time held significant shares in both the English club and Olympique Lyonnais.

The situation highlights how the influx of American capital, and the multi-club ownership models it introduces, can create regulatory complications even when sporting merit has been earned.

What does the future of European football look like?

US capital has already reshaped the operational frameworks of European football clubs.

If things continue as they are, we could see a sport-wide shift to American entertainment industry models, characterised by broadcast revenue optimisation.

Football clubs tend to have deeply rooted fan bases and strong cultural significance, offering investors access to new markets to extend their influence.

Given this reality, club acquisition could soon become little more than a vessel for commercial strategy for corporations.

Recent developments in the La Liga indicate that this idea may be closer to reality than expected.

Barcelona vs Villarreal is currently being planned to be played in Miami as a standalone international league fixture, with Real Madrid and many other clubs ‘strongly’ rejecting the concept.

Private equity firms are now targeting not only clubs, but also the organisations that manage and control broadcast and commercial rights.

In doing so, these companies place themselves at the core of the revenue-generating aspect of football.

The International Centre for Sports Studies report shows that private equity comprised the majority share of all foreign investment deals in European football between 2019 and 2023. US-based investors were responsible for just under 90% of transactions.

Should this trajectory of US investment and the search for global commercial success continue, the beautiful game will inevitably risk losing its traditional values.

As US influence grows, it will become harder to balance profit with football’s traditions. To protect the game, investors must show both long-term vision and respect for its culture.

Previous ArticleNext Article

FIFPRO demands governance reform after FIFA’s FFE failure

While FIFA cancelled plans to move forward with FIFA Forward Enterprise (FFE), FIFPRO are demanding change at the top of football’s global governing body.

‘Abuse of power’

The plan to sell minority stakes in future FIFA competitions to private investors brought intense criticism from fans across the world.

Governing bodies including UEFA (Europe), CONCACAF (North America, Central America and the Caribbean) and the AFC (Asia) rallied against FFE and FIFA President Gianni Infantino, leading to a crisis meeting in Morocco to determine Infantino’s seemingly untenable position at the head of world football governance.

The meeting, however, confirmed Infantino will remain as FIFA President going forward – a decision which has since prompted FIFPRO to make their stance clear: governance reform is a must.

“The withdrawal of FFE was inevitable. But withdrawing the proposal does not erase what it revealed,” the organisation said via an official statement on the FIFPRO website.

“A plan capable of permanently altering the ownership and governance of the FIFA World Cup, and commercialising the competitions built by generations of players, was conceived in secrecy, negotiated behind closed doors and brought to the brink of agreement before the FIFA Council, the Member Associations, players and football’s recognised stakeholders even knew it existed.”

“That is not merely a governance failure. It is a profound abuse of presidential power.”

 

How to navigate governance post-FFE

As reiterated by FIFPRO, the FFE controversy arrived a mere few weeks after a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between FIFA and the player’s union marked an optimistic step to a more collaborative future.

But what was previously a step in the right direction, now seems an insufficient policy to protect players – and the wider landscape of world football – from future unilateral decisions at the top.

FIFPRO’s demands – agreed upon by the Presidents of all FIFPRO regional divisions across Africa, Asia/Oceania, Europe, South America and Central & North America – include measures such as:

  • Using the Global Social Dialogue Platform as fundamental part of FIFA’s governance
  • Engagement with stakeholders over future decisions affecting the professional game
  • Voting rights for professional football’s stakeholders on the FIFA Council
  • Structural reforms to prevent future unilateral decisions

The message from FIFPRO is therefore clear. Now is not the time to rest on criticism; stakeholders in the professional game must encourage action and reform.

“These reforms are now indespensable. But they are the responsibility of the future, not an absolution of the past,” FIFPRO continued via their official statement.

“The players did not create this crisis. They will insist that football emerges from it with stronger institutions, stronger safeguards and leadership worthy of the trust the game demands.”

Central Coast Mariners Women secure future under Holman Barnes Group

The future of the Central Coast Mariners Women has been secured after the Holman Barnes Group (HBG) reached an agreement to become the new operator of the club’s A-League Women program. The deal ends uncertainty surrounding the team’s participation in the 2026/27 season.

The agreement between HBG, the Australian Professional Leagues (APL) and Total Soccer Growth Holdings (TSG) ensures the Mariners will remain in the Ninja A-League Women competition. It also introduces a new operating model designed to provide long-term stability.

The uncertainty emerged following TSG’s acquisition of the Central Coast Mariners’ men’s side and academy in June. The women’s program was excluded from the original takeover. TSG already owns English football side Queens Park Rangers (QPR) and MLS club Los Angeles FC. The omission placed the future of the 2025 A-League Women champions in doubt. It also prompted the APL to seek a sustainable solution ahead of the new campaign.

A new operating model

Under the new arrangement, HBG will oversee all operational aspects of the women’s team. This includes the football program, staffing and day-to-day management. TSG will retain the club licence and continue overseeing the men’s program and academy. It will also support the women’s operation through its broader football network.

The agreement represents an innovative partnership between the three organisations. It has been designed to strengthen the long-term sustainability of professional women’s football on the Central Coast. HBG’s plans extend beyond the senior team. They include a strong focus on developing participation pathways and creating greater opportunities for female footballers throughout New South Wales.

Attention turns to the new season

The transition comes at a crucial time with preparations for the 2026/27 Ninja A-League Women season underway ahead of its October 16 start. The new operators are expected to begin managing the program immediately. This remains subject to the completion of the remaining regulatory processes. The team currently has no sponsors and games are expected to be moved away from Central Coast Stadium.

The A-League had previously set a July 31 deadline for new owners to be found to secure a place in the upcoming competition. With that now achieved, HBG will be on the clock to ensure the season begins without disruption and becomes a commercial success.

For the Central Coast Mariners Women, the agreement delivers certainty after a turbulent off-season. It also allows the club to shift its attention to the 2026/27 campaign and the team’s on-field performance.

Most Popular Topics

Editor Picks

Send this to a friend