Boob Armour: Protecting women in sport for the future

Boob Armour

Launched in 2020, Boob Armour (which is officially licensed by the AFL and AFLW) was founded by Suzie Betts with the sole ambition of giving more women and girls the confidence to play impact sports while protecting their breasts from injury.

A world-first for women’s sport, Boob Armour inserts are designed to provide breast support and to minimise unwanted movement during running, as well as absorb impact to alleviate injury to breast tissue.

The inserts are made from a soft but strong polyethylene that is just two millimetres thick. These inserts extend around the underarm for added protection, stabilising the breasts into position and are easily insertable into a sports bra.

Inspired by personal experience, Betts sought medical research for the need of protective inserts for women. What she found was an underwhelming lack of attention given to the issue, and furthermore, that the products designed to do the job were ill-suited to the vast majority of women.

Suzie Betts Photo

To start off, what is Boob Armour?

Suzie Betts: So, Boob Armour is protective inserts for girls playing contact, impact and ball sport. They’re two-millimetre-thick polyethylene inserts that you slot into your sport bra or crop top pre-match. A lot of girls obviously don’t want to have anything heavy in any shape or form, and the inserts weigh about fifteen grams each.

Once they’re in, you’re basically invincible. You could get kicked; you could get punched – you won’t feel a thing. By absorbing the impact (which is what the polyethylene does) it actually alleviates any injuries.

What inspired you to initiate the Boob Armour project? How did it all come together?

Suzie Betts: In 2018, I found lumps in my breast. And the first thing my cancer surgeon asked me was whether I had received a trauma, which I found strange at the time. What I’ve since found out is trauma lumps, which present themselves later in life, can present themselves as breast cancer cells. Even through MRIs and ultrasounds can’t differentiate between them. So, you have to go down the path of what I did – biopsies and three lots of surgery to find out I didn’t have breast cancer (which I never thought I had) – to find out the lumps were a result of a trauma I received when I was younger.

So, with that in mind I had two girls who played AFLW and basketball and after asking them about their experiences they acknowledged that they’re hit in the boobs all the time whilst playing. From thereI began to look for research and found that basically, globally there’d been really nothing in terms of studies.

There’d been a study done in America in regard to football that had found out that out of 90 girls playing, 50% had reported sustaining a breast injury. And most of them hadn’t reported it to anyone. Part of the challenge would’ve been that most of the coaches were male at the time so it would’ve been difficult for the players to talk about and the guys aren’t going to ask about it. 12% of those girls actually said that the injury had affected their participation.

So, I went in search of what there was to protect girls’ boobs and really came across nothing except products that were unsuitable. So, we’ve made sure that our shells encapsulate the shape of the breasts and we’ve got seven sizes; so, there’s a size for everyone.

Originally, my background wasn’t in football it was in Aussie Rules. But as we’ve gone along, we’ve had a lot of interest from Europe and the United Kingdom in regards to football and rugby as well. And so, it dawned on me about how many girls were avoiding chest passing in football. [From there] what we’ve found is a lot of parents who previously avoided letting their kids play football, rugby or Aussie Rules are now letting them play.

Boob Armour in kit

Has it been a challenge to educate and get people on board with the product?

Suzie Betts: Absolutely it has been a challenge. Because even though we’re talking female sport and it has been around for years, it’s still run a lot by men. No one really has thought about those injuries and that’s why the research hasn’t been there.

Not until 2020 was anything done in regards to AFL injuries, which saw 207 girls who were playing AFL and rugby surveyed. About 60% of them said that they had had a breast injury and most of them have said they couldn’t play on because of it. The numbers are there when they do it but it’s been difficult to get any further research done other than what is available. Only through my own trauma do I know the next steps.

So, opening up the conversation with the male contingent has been the hardest bit and avoidance of talking about it [for years] hasn’t really helped.

Since the launch of Boob Armour, what has the response been like from the overall sporting community?

Suzie Betts: For women this is like the best thing they’ve ever seen. We’ve got some co-ed schools taking on board the point that girls need to be protected in the same way boys are in cricket for example.

And the response has been phenomenal. When the girls put it on the confidence they get for tackles, marking and chest passing is like a newfound confidence, because they know that they can just run through it or have the ability to mark or chest the ball without any injury.

So, it’s been phenomenal but the key is education. All of our medical research and promotion of that education is essential because we want it to be like the mouthguard of the future. We want it to be in every girl’s kit; if you’re getting ready of football you’ve got your shin guards, your mouthguard and your Boob Armour.

[And with it] all the girls play tougher. After every game they say with confidence that they went for it and previously it wasn’t like that without Boob Armour. And in addition, it works to minimise bounce. Another study we found discovered that a lot of teenage girls drop out of sport because they don’t have the right support. So, we don’t want that to be a reason why girls stop playing sport. We need everyone to stay in [sport] for as long as they can, so, if that tiny thing is keeping you away from sport, we’re here to alleviate that problem.

We’re really targeting the grassroots, which is why I am proud to see the young girls wearing it because they’re the ones we’ve got to educate to keep it. Some girls are only going to play for fun but they’ll be protected along the way and that’s the most important thing. It’s all about prevention.

Previous ArticleNext Article

Is the FW Regional Girls Training Camp bridging the access gap for talent?

In Western Australia, the tyranny of distance has historically functioned as the primary barrier to talent identification.

For regional footballers, the logistical and financial burden of accessing elite pathways often renders the concept of “equal opportunity” a theoretical ideal rather than an operational reality. However, the recent Regional Girls Training Camp, hosted at the Sam Kerr Football Centre, suggests that Football West is moving to operationalise the structural changes announced in its 2026 academy overhaul.

Earlier this week, nearly 100 players aged 10 to 17 converged on the State Centre for Football in Cannington. The three-day camp invited participants from the previous year’s Country Week carnival, represents the first tangible application of the “real-match” and high-performance philosophy outlined by Football West Development Manager Gareth Naven late last year.

While the previous announcement of the Regional Academy model focused on the structural shift from training camps to competitive “State Carnivals,” this current initiative addresses the resource gap. For stakeholders and policymakers, the camp serves as a case study in how centralised infrastructure assets can be leveraged to service a decentralised demographic.

Infrastructure as an equity lever

A lack of high-performance environments defines the economic reality of regional football. The facility gap between metro NPL setups and regional clubs is often vast. Football West uses the Sam Kerr Football Centre to subsidise the “professional experience” for regional talent.

Sarah Carroll, Female Football & Advocacy Manager, notes the purpose extends beyond simple engagement. The curriculum fused on-pitch technical training with athlete development workshops.

Geography usually blocks access to this sport science for a 14-year-old Pilbara or Goldfields player. By centralising this education, the governing body helps standardise the player pool’s knowledge base. Naven’s alignment strategy demands closing the “knowledge gap” alongside the technical one.

The economics of the “Legacy”

Critically, the WA Government funds the camp through the Female Community Legacy Program. This highlights the Legacy Program’s ROI for the Department of Local Government, Sport and Cultural Industries.

A stated aim to “enhance club capability” acknowledges that player development requires an ecosystem. The funding mechanism here is significant. Without state intervention, the cost per head would prohibit many families from attending.

Targeted funding bridges the gap between community participation and elite commercial viability. Regional Lead Tanya Amazzini calls these opportunities “essential” for player growth and confidence.

Strategic alignment with the 2026 pathway

Observers must view this camp alongside the Regional Academy system overhaul. The new “State Carnival” model demands players physically prepared for elite competition. This camp functions as the preparatory phase for that new competitive reality.

Football West uses elite exposure to mitigate the shock of transitioning to state programs. Furthermore, involving players from the Pilbara to the South West keeps the talent net wide. Maintaining sight on remote talent requires constant investment.

The residual challenge

However, the long-term impact warrants caution. The “re-entry” phase remains the primary challenge. Players return to clubs with significantly fewer resources than the Sam Kerr Football Centre.

Success depends on the “trickle-down” effect of the education provided. If players transfer this knowledge locally, the aggregate standard of regional football rises. If isolated, the experience may simply make the regional gap feel more pronounced.

Integrating 100 regional girls into the state’s premier facility executes the strategic plan. It signals that the Centre delivers dividends to the broader ecosystem, not just the elite.

Two CEOs, One Code: Why Alignment Between Football Australia and the A-Leagues Matters More Than Ever

The NSL didn’t fail because of football. It failed because of structure, money and misalignment. With new CEOs at Football Australia and the A-Leagues, the sport now stands at a crossroads it has faced before.

Australian football finds itself at a rare inflection point. Not because of a single appointment, but because of two. With Martin Kugeler set to commence as CEO of Football Australia on 16 February 2026, and Steve Rosich now installed as CEO of the Australian Professional Leagues, the code has, perhaps for the first time in a long while, a genuine opportunity to align governance, commercial ambition and strategic execution across its two most powerful institutions.

This moment matters. Not symbolically, but structurally.

Kugeler arrives at Football Australia with a background that is markedly different from many of his predecessors. As former CEO of Stan and a senior leader across finance and strategy roles, he brings a media-native, commercially fluent mindset into a federation grappling with modern realities. Football Australia’s most recent financials tell a complex story: record revenues of $124 million, alongside a record $8.5 million loss. Chair Anter Isaac has been clear that grassroots programs and national teams will not be impacted, and projections suggest a return to surplus by 2026. But the message beneath the numbers is unmistakable: football can no longer rely on participation alone to sustain its future.

This is where Kugeler’s skillset becomes relevant. His mandate is not simply to steady the ship, but to modernise how Football Australia thinks about audiences, digital platforms, commercial partnerships and long-term value creation. Increasing commercial revenue, improving digital engagement and strengthening the federation’s market relevance are not optional objectives; they are existential ones.

Crucially, Kugeler does not inherit Football Australia in isolation. His tenure begins alongside Steve Rosich’s leadership of the A-Leagues, and that duality could become Australian football’s greatest advantage, if handled correctly.

Rosich, as previously outlined in my last CEO opinion, is not a caretaker. He is a commercial operator forged in high-pressure environments: the AFL, the Melbourne Cup Carnival and elite corporate sport. He understands sponsorship activation, broadcast value, governance discipline and the language of major brands. Where Kugeler brings media and platform intelligence, Rosich brings commercial deal-making and entertainment-led strategy.Together, they represent something Australian football has often lacked: complementary leadership at the federation and league level.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Soccerscene (@soccerscene.au)

For too long, the relationship between governing bodies and professional leagues has oscillated between tension and tolerance.

The recent Football Australia AGM made clear that, at least publicly, the relationship with the APL is currently characterised by “complete cooperation and collaboration.”

That sentiment must now be operationalised, not merely stated.

The $4.1 million expected credit loss linked largely to monies owed by the APL is a reminder that financial alignment, transparency and shared accountability are not abstract governance ideals. They are practical necessities. Disagreements over historical balances cannot be allowed to morph into structural dysfunction. Kugeler and Rosich must treat alignment not as diplomacy, but as strategy.

The real test of that alignment may arrive sooner than expected in the form of the Australian Championship.

The inception of a national second-tier competition is, in principle, a positive and necessary evolution for the game. But early signs should concern anyone paying attention. Clubs have already borne the brunt of operational and travel costs. Broadcast timings have been questionable, with examples such as Heidelberg United playing 1pm Sunday matches that clash directly with family and community priorities. There has been no major commercial sponsor announced, no broadcast-led narrative strategy, and no licensed merchandise program attached to the competition.

This is not sustainable.

Australian football has lived this movie before. The National Soccer League did not fail because of a lack of passion or history. It failed because of structure, economics and misaligned responsibility. The Crawford Report in 2003 was unequivocal in its findings: when Soccer Australia directly controlled the NSL’s operations, funding and commercial arrangements, inherent conflicts emerged. The governing body lacked the specialist commercial expertise to run a financially viable league, while the league itself became a financial burden that distracted from core responsibilities such as governance, development and national teams.

The solution then was clear: a licensed, semi-independent league model, aligned but not controlled. The A-Leagues were born from that logic.

The Australian Championship must not drift into the same structural grey zone that doomed the NSL. Kugeler will need to assess, early and decisively, where this competition sits within the ecosystem. Who carries the commercial risk? Who controls broadcast strategy? How are clubs protected from cost blowouts? And critically, where does the revenue model come from?

This is where alignment with Rosich becomes essential. Football Australia should not be attempting to commercialise a national competition in isolation, just as the APL should not be expected to absorb costs without strategic clarity. Joint sponsorship frameworks, coordinated broadcast planning and shared commercial storytelling are not nice-to-haves. They are safeguards against repeating history.

More broadly, the opportunity for knowledge-sharing between Kugeler and Rosich extends well beyond one competition. Both bring deep corporate networks. Both understand boardrooms, not just dressing rooms. Both speak the language of partners who expect return on investment, not goodwill.

If leveraged properly, this dual leadership can reshape how football presents itself to government, broadcasters, sponsors and global stakeholders ahead of the 2026 World Cup cycle. It can also restore confidence internally, among clubs, administrators and fans who have grown weary of fragmented strategy and reactive decision-making.

The warning is simple: alignment must be intentional. History shows that Australian football suffers most when roles blur, responsibilities overlap and commercial logic is secondary to sentiment. The promise, however, is equally clear. With Kugeler focusing Football Australia on governance, national teams and commercial modernisation, and Rosich driving the A-Leagues as a serious entertainment product, the code finally has the chance to operate as a coordinated system rather than competing silos.

Two CEOs. Two institutions. One code.

If they learn from the past, share expertise openly and resist the temptation to repeat structural mistakes, this period could mark not just a reset, but a genuine maturation of Australian football.

The opportunity is there. The question now is whether the game is ready to take it.

Most Popular Topics

Editor Picks

Send this to a friend