Pepsi MAX Named Founding Partner of Hill Dickinson Stadium

Avatar
Image credit: JSvideos / Shutterstock.com

Everton FC has confirmed Pepsi MAX  as the Founding Partner of Hill Dickinson Stadium in a five-year partnership.

The strategic deal establishes Pepsi MAX as the club’s Official Soft Drink Supplier, permitting PepsiCo products to be stocked in the various retail points of the stadium, as well as company branding on venue assets like LED boards and digital menus.

Pepsi MAX and PepsiCo have a long history in sports sponsorships around the world, with an estimated AUD 460.99 million spent on sponsorships in the United States in 2023.

Last year, PepsiCo signed a 10-year agreement with the UEFA Champions League, incorporating the brand’s involvement in event sponsorships, advertisement, and culinary promotions using PepsiCo products.

The Hill Dickinson Stadium opened its doors at the start of the season after four years of construction, costing approximately AUD 1.44 million to build in the location of Bramley-Moore Dock in Liverpool, adjacent of the River Mersey.

The stadium is named after the Liverpool-based law firm of the same name who are rumoured to be paying AUD 18 million per year for 10 years after Everton employed US-based sales agency, Elevate, to oversee the sponsor naming rights.

Chief Partnership Officer at Everton, Mark Rollings mentioned teaming up with the globally renowned organisation is a huge endorsement for the stadium and home of Everton FC.

“Pepsi MAX is a brand recognised and enjoyed by millions of people around the world, and we are excited to work with them to enhance the matchday experience for our fans and bring fresh energy to our new stadium,” he said via Club Statement.

UK Head of Sports Partnership at Pepsi Co, John Savage said the momentum of the football club within Hill Dickinson Stadium has been inspiring.

“This partnership with Everton Football Club’s stadium marks a moment of continued commitment in elevating the fan experience in football,” he said via Club Statement.

“We look forward to seeing the vibrant atmosphere our collaboration will bring to Hill Dickinson Stadium, creating some unforgettable moments for supporters and building on the Club’s rich heritage.”

Hill Dickinson Stadium is set to be one of the 10 stadiums to host the UEFA Euro 2028.

Previous ArticleNext Article

Capital Football Introduces Pink Armband to Protect Junior Referees

Avatar
Image Credit: Marist Canberra FC

Capital Football has launched a visible identification program for referees under 18, requiring them to wear a pink armband during matches. It’s intended to build awareness surrounding the concern across Australian football about the abuse driving young officials out of the game.

The Pink Armband Initiative, effective immediately across Capital Football’s competitions in the ACT and surrounding region, makes junior referees identifiable to players, coaches and spectators. The federation says the marker is designed to set clear behavioural expectations and signal that many match officials are minors still developing their skills.

Capital Football acknowledged a referee crisis as far back as 2022, at which point it restructured its entire referee department in partnership with Football Australia. The pink armband program is the latest layer of that response; this time by targeting the cultural conditions on match day rather than systems of recruitment and pay.

A problem that spans codes and states

Research has consistently linked referee abuse to declining retention rates, with officials quitting in growing numbers due to sustained mistreatment, a trend researchers warn will reduce the pool of skilled match officials available at all levels of the game. Studies also show that young, less experienced referees are disproportionately likely to be subject to abuse.

Capital Football is not alone in reaching for a visible solution. Similar programs operate across Football Queensland, Football South Australia, Football South Coast and several other federations, while Basketball Victoria and Basketball South Australia have adopted comparable measures through the Green Whistle initiative. The spread of these programs across codes and states reflects a shared administrative problem: many grassroots referees are teenagers and volunteers who do not officiate for money but because they love the game, and abuse is eroding that foundation.

For a federation overseeing nearly 29,000 registered players, fewer referees means fewer matches. Fewer matches means reduced participation. The pink armband is a low-cost intervention with structural consequences if it works.

Compliance and competition: Everton ordered to pay compensation following major verdict

Avatar
Image credit: JSvideos / Shutterstock.com

In a landmark decision by the Premier League Independent Disciplinary Commission, Everton must now pay Burnley upwards of AUD 66 million (£35 million) after breaching financial rules in the 2021-22 season.

Behind the verdict

Playing in the Premier League is, in itself, one of the most lucrative positions for a club to be in. This year’s Championship Play-off final – a contest deemed ‘the richest match in football’ – guaranteed winners Hull City a revenue uplift of AUD 389 million (£205 million) according to Deloitte’s Sports Business Group.

It is no wonder, therefore, why teams are so desperate to stay at the top of the pyramid, especially given that relegation can lead to heavy financial hits in revenue, wage reduction and transfer spending power.

Competition is certain – and the football is all the better for it. But when this competitive edge overtakes compliance, what happens off the field is just as impactful.

In 2023, the Premier League charged Everton with breaching financial rules during the 2021-22 season – the same season which saw the Toffees finish just four points above relegated Burnley. Everton received an initial 10-point deduction, which ultimately decreased to six points on appeal.

That season, Everton stayed up. But for Burnley, had the points deduction come at an earlier date, their survival in the top-flight may have been secured.

 

What did the ruling find?

In its verdict, the Premier League’s Independent Disciplinary Commission deemed that Everton gained a competitive advantage over Burnley as a result of financial breaches.

Burnley will now receive AUD 66 million (£35 million) in compensation from Everton, although the Merseyside club will appeal the  commission’s decision.

“This ruling sets a dangerous and unworkable precedent for English football, given it is constructed on a principle that a club can be in breach of financial rules at any point in a financial year,” Everton said via an official club statement.

Burnley, on the other hand, reaffirmed its position that the case was a question of fair play and ensuring a level playing field.

“Our action has always been about making football fair,” the club said via an official statement.

“Clubs that comply with the rules deserve to compete on a level playing field. Fans deserve it. The sport demands it.”

 

The impact of the case

This is a landmark decision which may have profound effects on the future of financial compliance in English football.

In the past, financial breaches remained within the realm of just that – finances. But with the ruling between Everton and Burnley, it now opens up further questions on what compliance is actually worth in the game.

And whether future investigations may lead to similar – or even higher – compensation packages to affected clubs.

Most Popular Topics

Editor Picks

Send this to a friend