New fiscal year brings an opportunity for community park improvements

Crown Reserves Improvement Fund

The Crown Reserves Improvement Fund (CRIF) supports Crown land managers (CLMs) by providing funding for repairs, maintenance and improvements on Crown reserves. The funding aims to benefit the community, boost our economy and contribute to the cultural, sporting and recreational life of NSW.

It is self-sustainable, as the interest and repayments from previous projects help fund newer and ongoing works within NSW Crown Lands.

Crown Land is owned and managed by the NSW State Government, which equates to roughly 42% of the state of New South Wales. Among other categories, reserves make up 3.1 million hectares of NSW Crown Land.

Crown reserves are land dedicated on behalf of the community for public use and purposes, with the most notable being recreation and sport. The Crown Reserves Improvement Fund (CRIF) supports Crown land managers (CLMs), wherein, after evidence and applications are approved, funding is provided for the aforementioned repairs, maintenance, and improvements on Crown reserves. This can stem a wide variety of issues that community groups deem necessary and urgent to take on. Emu Park in Penrith received $160,000 to upgrade sports field floodlighting at Dukes Oval Sportsground in 2021, whereas Eric Mobbs Reserve in Winston Hills received $14,000 to construct an undercover seating area for lunch tables and shelter at the sports park.

The CRIF aims to build community rapport, support jobs and the economy, and further build upon NSW’s proud sporting culture.

If you are a CLM who wishes to explore the benefits of the CRIF for your local park or field, the following actions are recommended by Crown Land. The funding is expected to be open in September 2023, so obtaining quotes and supporting documentation, such as  potential uses, and the outcomes achieved if this project is successful.

Any successful grant will be credited in early 2024, in the last fiscal year (2022-2023, the CRIF funded 267 projects totalling just under $18 million.

The CLM in question must not have any outstanding CRIF projects or funding if they wish their application to be eligible. Any outstanding project must be completed within 12 months of receiving funding, and all project reports must be finalised within 14 months.

If this is the first project for a CLM, they must register for access on the CRIF reserve funding management page. Only select persons from each CLM are authorised to apply for funding, and these can be found on the CRIF website. Applicant details must be input, such as the CLM’s ABN, the park or crown land that the project is to be completed at.

Activity details are also a relevant topic that must be detailed and outlined in your application. In this section, the CLM needs to answer how the project will be done, and what benefit will be achieved in doing so. Images and maps are strongly recommended, particularly if funding is for pest management and weeding.

You must submit quotes for the project to the CRIF in order for your project to be considered. Depending on the grant that is being asked for, will determine the number of minimum quotes provided by the CLM for the CRIF to consider the application. At least one quote is needed for any grant from $0-$30,000, three or more for $30,001-$150,000, and anything more than this will need significant financial strategy from the CLM to provide cost estimates.

As the first funding round will open in September 2023, CLMs are encouraged to obtain quotes and relevant supporting documentation for a CRIF grant.

For full information and to apply, click here.

Previous ArticleNext Article

How Australian Support for the World Cup Has Changed Since 2022

Sodden, rowdy and 7,000-strong, the crowd that gathered at Federation Square before dawn on Saturday for Australia’s clash with the United States offered a vivid illustration of how much, and how little, has changed in Australian football support since Qatar 2022.

The scenes themselves were familiar: fans queuing from 2am, flares lit during the anthem, a barrier breach as the precinct hit capacity within minutes of opening. But the fact the screening happened at all says something about the shifting institutional weight football now carries in Australia.

Just this May, the Melbourne’s Arts Precinct had decided not to screen Socceroos matches at Fed Square this tournament, citing crowd damage and arrests during a 2022 World Cup screening. Football Australia publicly pushed back, and the Victorian Government ultimately overturned the decision, with security and police presence increased to manage the risk. That a state government intervened to guarantee a public screening reflects how central these gatherings have become to football’s standing in Australia, not just as a peripheral fan event but a piece of cultural infrastructure worth a premier’s political capital.

A Tournament Inherited, Not Just Attended

The scale of public interest now sits on a different foundation than it did in 2022. Football Australia’s most recent National Participation Report recorded an 11% increase in total participation to 1,911,539 people, with women and girls’ participation rising 16% to 221,436. Industry analysis attributes much of that growth to the “Matildas effect” following the home Women’s World Cup in 2023, projecting 407,000 new junior participants by 2027 on the back of that tournament and Football Australia’s broader infrastructure strategy. Whatever happens to the Socceroos in the United States, the crowd at Fed Square this year is drawn from a participation base substantially larger than the one watching from lounge rooms and pubs in Qatar.

That shift shows up in how fans say they’ll engage with this tournament regardless of results. New industry research found 79% of intended Australian viewers plan to keep watching the World Cup even if the Socceroos are eliminated, an 11-point increase on 2022, suggesting interest is becoming less tied to the national team’s results than it once was. The same research found television remains dominant, with 88% of viewers planning to watch on TV, rising above 90 per cent for evening and weekend matches, even as audiences increasingly split their attention across streaming and second screens.

Crowd Behaviour as the Unresolved Question

What hasn’t shifted is the tension over crowd conduct at public screenings, and what it costs football’s civic standing when things go wrong. The Melbourne Arts Precinct’s chief executive was explicit in 2026 that damage and behaviour during 2022 screenings were the basis for initially declining to host watch parties this time, despite trouble-free crowds during the 2023 Women’s World Cup.

Saturday’s flares and barrier breach will likely feed that same debate going into the knockout stages, even as the broader numbers tell a story of a sport with a far deeper public footing than it had four years ago. The Fed Square images from 2022 prompted other Australian cities to scramble together live sites once the Socceroos reached the knockout rounds, reflecting a pattern likely to repeat if Australia progresses from Group D, with Friday’s match against Paraguay now carrying outsized weight for a campaign that began with what fans, by their own description, considered horrible refereeing and a result short of expectations.

WA Government and Virgin Australia Partner to Bring Discounted Flights for Italian Football Series in Perth

The Western Australian Government has partnered with Virgin Australia to offer discounted airfares to Perth ahead of a three-match series featuring AC Milan, Inter Milan, Juventus and Palermo, in a move that reflects how state governments are increasingly using major sporting fixtures as tools of tourism and economic strategy.

Subsidising travel costs rather than simply promoting the matches signals a shift in how state governments are approaching major sporting events. WA Tourism Minister Reece Whitby positioned the series within the state’s broader Winter of Unmissable Sport strategy, framing the partnership as a way to fill hotels, support local businesses and generate visible economic activity across a single week of programming. That logic places football alongside other major events states have used to justify public investment in visitor attraction, where the return is measured in tourism spend rather than ticket revenue alone.

A bet on Australia’s appetite for European football

Touring Italian clubs is not a routine occurrence in Australia, and Sport and Recreation Minister Rita Saffioti’s comments point to an underlying assumption behind the investment: that the existing fan base for European football in Australia is substantial enough to justify a state government underwriting travel costs to fill a stadium on the other side of the country.

Australian audiences for international football have grown considerably over the past decade, driven by streaming access, diaspora communities and the rising visibility of leagues once difficult to follow locally. State governments positioning themselves to capture economic value from that growth, rather than leaving it to broadcasters and travel operators, marks a change in how football’s commercial footprint in Australia is being treated by policymakers.

It also raises a question likely to recur as more international club fixtures are scheduled in Australian cities: whether public subsidy for travel around marquee football events delivers economic value beyond the host city, or whether the benefit is concentrated narrowly within the host state’s tourism and hospitality sectors. Virgin Australia’s involvement reflects the commercial logic on the airline side, with the partnership forming part of a broader push to connect Australians with major domestic and international destinations.

For the domestic football industry, the series is a reminder that international club football is competing for the same audience attention as the A-Leagues and grassroots competitions. Whether that competition proves complementary or extractive, in terms of where football-related spending in Australia ultimately lands, is a question state and national football bodies are likely to watch closely as similar fixtures become more frequent.

Most Popular Topics

Editor Picks

Send this to a friend