Beyond the Hype: Challenges for Women’s Football

Women’s football in Australia is thriving like never before, but behind the record-breaking crowds and rising participation lies a growing need for deeper, long-term support at the grassroots level.

It’s no surprise that women’s football has seen a major rise in popularity over the past few years.

A big part of that growth was driven by the 2023 FIFA Women’s World Cup, which was held right here in Australia.

The tournament saw the Matildas make an incredible run to the semi-finals, winning over the nation and breaking multiple television records in the process.

Channel 7 alone reached 18.6 million viewers throughout the tournament, and the Matildas’ semi-final against England became the most-watched TV program in more than 20 years, with an average audience of 7.2 million and a total reach of 11.15 million.

The impact went far beyond the screen, inspired by the Matildas’ performance and the excitement of hosting the tournament, more than 21,000 women and girls picked up football for the first time.

By the end of 2024, over 158,000 women and girls were playing across Australia — a 16% increase from the previous year.

But with this incredible rise in interest and participation, new challenges have started to surface — so what exactly are they?

One of the biggest areas in women’s football that still desperately needs support is adequate infrastructure.

As more women and girls take up the game, the pressure on clubs to provide adequate, modern facilities has grown — and in many cases, the infrastructure simply isn’t keeping up.

A 2024 report by Football Australia, revealed that only two in five clubs nationwide have change rooms that are considered female-friendly, that means a lot of clubs are still lacking basic necessities like separate spaces for men and women.

As the number of women and girls taking part in football continues to grow, these shortcomings are starting to seriously impact clubs on the ground.

David Cvetkovski, president of the Preston Lions Football Club, mentioned that after the Women’s World Cup, the club saw a 30% spike in girls signing up to play. While that level of interest is a positive sign for the sport, it has stretched the club’s resources thin — especially when it comes to basic facilities.

Right now, the Preston Lions don’t even have enough female toilets to accommodate the growing number of players.

Cvetkovski didn’t mince words, calling infrastructure investment in the women’s game “light years behind.” He believes this lack of development is holding back progress — and he’s not alone.

When clubs don’t have the right facilities, it’s not just an inconvenience; it directly limits players’ access to quality training environments, which in turn affects their development and performance.

Poor infrastructure also sends a bigger message, that the women’s game is still not being treated with the same seriousness or respect.

In response to these concerns, the Albanese Government introduced the “Play Our Way” program, pledging $200 million to improve infrastructure for women and girls in sport. The initiative aims to deliver safe, inclusive, and sustainable facilities, equipment, and support across Australia.

While the program has certainly helped, some — including former Socceroo and advocate Craig Foster — believe it still falls short.

That concern grows even louder when you consider football officials estimate that $2.9 billion is needed just to bring grassroots facilities across the country up to standard.

Right now, the growth of women’s football — especially at the grassroots level — is moving faster than the funding and resources trying to support it.

Without long-term, targeted investment in infrastructure, there’s a real risk that the progress made in women’s football could stall.

And that would mean countless girls and women missing out on the opportunity to thrive, develop, and feel truly supported in the sport they love.

Another major challenge currently facing women and girls in football is the growing cost of participating at the grassroots level. While financial barriers impact both the men’s and women’s sides of the sport, the effect on the women’s game is especially concerning.

At a time when there is a strong push to grow, develop, and create more opportunities for female players, however, rising costs are threatening to slow that momentum.

Although football is often seen as an accessible sport, the reality for many families tells a different story.

According to an AusPlay survey conducted between July 2023 and December 2024, the average annual cost for a child to play football was $513—more than double the average cost of playing Aussie Rules, which remains significantly cheaper in comparison.

In Sydney’s inner west, families registering their children with the Strathfield Strikers Football Club are paying around $480 just for registration, and that’s before adding in the cost of uniforms, boots, shin pads, training gear, and travel.

For many households already dealing with the pressures of inflation, rising grocery bills, rent, and fuel prices, those football-related expenses can quickly become overwhelming.

As a result, Alexandra Georgopoulos, the female football co-officer at Strathfield Strikers, says one of the biggest challenges her club faces is the struggle to retain players because of the high costs.

In Victoria, Ringwood City is another example where fees for boys and girls under 12 and 13 start at $700, and they go up as the kids get older — something that’s led some families to pull their children out.

High registration fees are a major obstacle, particularly for families with more than one child playing, or those from culturally and economically diverse backgrounds, and as the cost of living continues to increase, families are being forced to make difficult choices.

So, what was once a fun and enriching activity is at risk of becoming inaccessible for many, especially for young girls at the grassroots level, where the foundations of the future women’s game are being built.

For women’s football in Australia to truly thrive long-term, the momentum from the Matildas’ success must be matched with meaningful support at the grassroots level.

That means tackling not only the lack of adequate facilities, but also the rising costs that are making the sport increasingly out of reach for many families.

Without serious investment in both infrastructure and affordability, we risk leaving behind the very girls and women who are meant to be the future of the game.

Previous ArticleNext Article

Governance, guidelines and game integrity: Did the 2026 FIFA World Cup uphold all three?

The FIFA World Cup 2026 is now over. Aside from the action and drama on the pitch, it is how FIFA performed off it which will dictate its lasting legacy.

 

Money talks

Projections for this year’s tournament placed total revenue at an eye-watering figure of AUD 16 billion (USD 11 billion); in the end, the number reached AUD 21 billion (USD 15 billion).

The newly-introduced hydration breaks – much bemoaned by fans accustomed to a more traditional 45 minute half – generated further income. Fox Sports was expected to earn more than AUD 356 million (USD 250 million) from these breaks alone, taking global revenue upwards of AUD 1.4 billion (USD 1 billion).

Four minutes and 20 seconds per match, worth more than 1 billion dollars. For FIFA, therefore, time truly is money.

As the most profitable World Cup in history, it also raises further questions (and potential ideas) for how to continue the success. FIFA President, Gianni Infantino, is already considering ways to “unleash the commercial potential and opportunity that FIFA has” going forward.

“I think I can say that this FIFA World Cup here in particular has opened a lot of doors, a lot of opportunities, a lot of possibilities,” Infantino said.

“This will have an impact on what we can do all over the world, but the revenues and the financial economic success come only if the sporting side is right.”

Expanded participation – marking the first time a World Cup features 48 teams compared to the previous 32 – was a major factor in increasing revenue. More teams, more games, more sponsorship and advertising opportunities.

“There are discussions about whether we should increase more (from 48) to 64 (teams), but this will be debated and this will be discussed,” Infantino affirmed.

More revenue for FIFA should also mean its 211 Member Associations also benefit from further investment, although details regarding this remain unknown.

Record-breaking attendance

Going into the tournament, the issue surrounding ticket prices was widespread. Many fans accused the governing body of pricing fans out of the game they love – and the numbers justified it.

While tickets opened at AUD 85 (USD 60), the dynamic pricing led to resales worth tens of thousands of dollars. For the final between Spain and Argentina, fans seeking last-minute tickets needed closer to AUD 3 million (USD 2 million).

But despite the criticism aimed at the dynamic pricing system, FIFA’s resolve paid off. Attendances smashed previous records, with total attendance double the figure seen in Qatar 2022.

FIFA reported that 6,810,966 fans packed into stadiums across the 104 matches, reaching an average crowd of 65,490. With higher attendances also comes more revenue generated from hospitality within the stadium itself.

Clearly, the price of a ticket to the world’s biggest sporting tournament does not affect demand. If FIFA sets the price, people will pay.

Or rather, people who can afford these prices will.

 

Red card, rescinded

As USA and Bosnia & Herzegovina went toe-to-toe in their round-of-32 clash, few could have known the drama would continue far beyond the referee’s whistle after 90 minutes.

A red card for star-striker, Folarin Balogun, in the 64th minute prompted concerns among US fans not only for the remaining half-an-hour of play, but for the following round of the tournament: as per FIFA rules, a player who receives a red card automatically misses the subsequent match.

This was the case for Balogun, until external pressure entered the field. And for football’s global governing body, external pressure arrived in the form of the President of the United States of America.

The legality over the rescinded red card is irrelevant to the wider issue. People will dispute the various articles outlined in the FIFA Disciplinary Code, but the incident itself sets a problematic precedent for football’s global governing body: if FIFA compromises its rules and political neutrality for one nation, where does it draw the line in future tournaments?

The tournament’s integrity had already come under pressure before a match had kicked-off, following the first ever FIFA Peace Prize awarded to President Trump in December 2025. The rescinded red card ultimately added fuel to the fire.

 

A game of two halves

The FIFA World Cup 2026 was as entertaining on the pitch as it was controversial off it.

It featured some incredible individual performances from stars like Mbappe and Kane, as well as Cabo Verde’s Vozinha – the 40 year-old overnight sensation who became a tournament icon.

308 goals were scored, surpassing with flying colours the previous record of 172 in 2022. A goal-per-game ratio fo 2.96 was the highest in recorded history since 1970.

Celebrations like Norway’s ‘Viking Row’ took the world by storm, and several brands including Levi’s, Gillette and Under Armour (the latter being the tournament-winning boot sponsorship) enjoyed huge public attention online for their unique marketing approaches.

These are the stories which represent the World Cup at its very best and the side of football fans want to see: action-packed matches, world-class talent, inspirational underdog stories and moments which generate discussions between fans from all over the world.

Beyond the pitch, however, memories of this year’s tournament will be comprised of financial success marred by a failure to govern and uphold the game’s integrity throughout.

It is a disappointing contradiction, that the cost of the most entertaining and economically successful World Cup in history, is the growing concern whether we can believe in those delivering the game to us at all.

Build a home, create a culture: How do we secure the Socceroos as global competitors?

The Socceroos kicked off their World Cup campaign with a convincing 2-0 win over Turkey. It was an important win for their tournament ambitions, but also a statement about their quality on the world stage. It is time that we built a facility to ensure this quality is nurtured, not stifled.

Otherwise, we risk falling behind.

 

One of four…

Australia’s Men’s National Team currently sits as the 23rd-ranked team in the world in the official FIFA rankings. The Matildas, meanwhile, are the 15th highest-ranked women’s team.

This year is also the sixth consecutive FIFA Men’s World Cup featuring the Socceroos, confirming their position as a regular competitor in the most prestigious tournament in world football.

So why is it, despite these undeniably positive reflections of Australia’s growth in international football, that the Socceroos are still homeless?

At the 2022 FIFA Men’s World Cup in Qatar, Australia was one of four competing teams (a list featuring Denmark, Poland and Senegal) without a national base. In 2024, former Socceroos coach Graham Arnold described the team as “homeless” ahead of the World Cup qualifiers.

But four years on from the tournament’s last edition, the situations remains the same. And the world is taking notice.

 

A letter to the PM

In April this year, FIFA reportedly wrote to Australian Prime Minister, Anthony Albanese, encouraging the construction of a permanent home for football in the country.

The letter reflects concerns within the governing body that Australia, despite being so present in international football throughout the past 25 years, may fall behind the rest of the pack.

When we look at the talent in the current squad, Australia is by no means an emerging football economy. But commercial and infrastructural limitations in the landscape mean this talent is under-appreciated.

Nevertheless, it is a nation which regularly proves it can compete – and win – on the biggest stage. This we saw only a few days ago.

Which is why the players, coaches and staff representing the nation deserve a permanent facility which reflects, nurtures and inspires talent and competition. The survival of the landscape depends on it.

 

The investment question

Investment into football – from grassroots to professional levels – continues to be at the crux of national debate on how to secure football’s future in Australia.

In a conversation between Soccerscene and Melbourne-based community club, Sunbury United FC, infrastructure and facility-sharing challenges emphasised common grievances for many grassroots clubs.

The issue, therefore, is spread across the nation’s football pyramid. And prompts an uncomfortable question about future investments:

If even the Socceroos continue to share their current base, Leichhardt Oval, with various teams across rugby league and soccer, how can we ever expect clubs further down the pyramid to avoid similar fates?

The past few years, however, have fortunately seen improved investment into the women’s game in Australia – particularly embodied by the ‘Home of the Matildas’.

The result of a $101.1 million investment by the Victorian Government in collaboration with La Trobe University and the Federal Government, the facility boasts elite training features including premium FIFA-standard pitches, multiple changing rooms, a high-performance gym, a sports science lab and more.

This was a welcome and vital boost ahead of the 2023 FIFA Women’s World Cup which took place in Australia. Now, ever-increasing participation and pride are synonymous with women’s football, and the numbers confirm it.

In 2023, women and girls represented 190,746 participants across social, outdoor, fustal and registered football. In 2025, this increased to 231,435. It proves that, with the arrival of purposeful investment at the top, comes the spread of a football culture across the nation.

 

Aligning practical and cultural benefits

But what would a potential facility for the Socceroos actually look like? And what are the benefits?

When considering similar projects, we can look to both Japan and England as distinct examples of how a national base for football can unite practical, social and cultural benefits.

St George’s Park – England

Built in 2012, England’s base at St George’s Park is a masterclass in using facilities to establish a centre for industry cohesion and community impact.

As a centre of excellence, St George’s Park holds 14 outdoor pitches, a fustal arena, and hosts coaching and medical courses. It welcomes 28 teams across men’s, women’s, youth and para football, representing a place of unity and alignment for the entire football community.

Furthermore, the ‘Play Like the Pride’ program offers grassroots participants and school students the chance to experience the elite facilities for a day, showing how facilities can serve to connect young players to the world of their professional idols and foster real passion for the game.

JFA J-Village – Japan

The J-Village – beyond being a state-of-the-art football training centre – shows why a home for football can positively impact the community.

After being used as a support base for the nuclear power plant accident following the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake, the venue now holds a deeply important place in the memory of Fukishima. As a result, upon resuming full operations in 2019, the facility – and the football development within it – represented a sense of perseverance, reconstruction and unity.

And through hotels and public transportation links, the J-Village also welcomes tourists and business travellers, encouraging more people to step into the world of football in Japan.

One venue, therefore, can give rise to an essential part of a thriving football landscape: culture. A culture for participation, community outreach, and elite development.

 

Final thoughts

The focus of the summer will no doubt be how the Socceroos perform on the pitch. And with homes, offices, and public spaces brimming with enthusiastic support, the sense of national pride is irresistible.

But for all the positive sentiment currently taking hold of the nation, there will come a time when Australia’s World Cup run is over, at which point an all-important question must be asked:

How do we move forward?

We move forward by transforming buzz into an aligned vision, commitment to nurturing talent, and a desire to establish a real footballing culture across the nation.

The first step to building this culture? Building a home from which it can thrive.

Most Popular Topics

Editor Picks

Send this to a friend