Beyond the Hype: Challenges for Women’s Football

Women’s football in Australia is thriving like never before, but behind the record-breaking crowds and rising participation lies a growing need for deeper, long-term support at the grassroots level.

It’s no surprise that women’s football has seen a major rise in popularity over the past few years.

A big part of that growth was driven by the 2023 FIFA Women’s World Cup, which was held right here in Australia.

The tournament saw the Matildas make an incredible run to the semi-finals, winning over the nation and breaking multiple television records in the process.

Channel 7 alone reached 18.6 million viewers throughout the tournament, and the Matildas’ semi-final against England became the most-watched TV program in more than 20 years, with an average audience of 7.2 million and a total reach of 11.15 million.

The impact went far beyond the screen, inspired by the Matildas’ performance and the excitement of hosting the tournament, more than 21,000 women and girls picked up football for the first time.

By the end of 2024, over 158,000 women and girls were playing across Australia — a 16% increase from the previous year.

But with this incredible rise in interest and participation, new challenges have started to surface — so what exactly are they?

One of the biggest areas in women’s football that still desperately needs support is adequate infrastructure.

As more women and girls take up the game, the pressure on clubs to provide adequate, modern facilities has grown — and in many cases, the infrastructure simply isn’t keeping up.

A 2024 report by Football Australia, revealed that only two in five clubs nationwide have change rooms that are considered female-friendly, that means a lot of clubs are still lacking basic necessities like separate spaces for men and women.

As the number of women and girls taking part in football continues to grow, these shortcomings are starting to seriously impact clubs on the ground.

David Cvetkovski, president of the Preston Lions Football Club, mentioned that after the Women’s World Cup, the club saw a 30% spike in girls signing up to play. While that level of interest is a positive sign for the sport, it has stretched the club’s resources thin — especially when it comes to basic facilities.

Right now, the Preston Lions don’t even have enough female toilets to accommodate the growing number of players.

Cvetkovski didn’t mince words, calling infrastructure investment in the women’s game “light years behind.” He believes this lack of development is holding back progress — and he’s not alone.

When clubs don’t have the right facilities, it’s not just an inconvenience; it directly limits players’ access to quality training environments, which in turn affects their development and performance.

Poor infrastructure also sends a bigger message, that the women’s game is still not being treated with the same seriousness or respect.

In response to these concerns, the Albanese Government introduced the “Play Our Way” program, pledging $200 million to improve infrastructure for women and girls in sport. The initiative aims to deliver safe, inclusive, and sustainable facilities, equipment, and support across Australia.

While the program has certainly helped, some — including former Socceroo and advocate Craig Foster — believe it still falls short.

That concern grows even louder when you consider football officials estimate that $2.9 billion is needed just to bring grassroots facilities across the country up to standard.

Right now, the growth of women’s football — especially at the grassroots level — is moving faster than the funding and resources trying to support it.

Without long-term, targeted investment in infrastructure, there’s a real risk that the progress made in women’s football could stall.

And that would mean countless girls and women missing out on the opportunity to thrive, develop, and feel truly supported in the sport they love.

Another major challenge currently facing women and girls in football is the growing cost of participating at the grassroots level. While financial barriers impact both the men’s and women’s sides of the sport, the effect on the women’s game is especially concerning.

At a time when there is a strong push to grow, develop, and create more opportunities for female players, however, rising costs are threatening to slow that momentum.

Although football is often seen as an accessible sport, the reality for many families tells a different story.

According to an AusPlay survey conducted between July 2023 and December 2024, the average annual cost for a child to play football was $513—more than double the average cost of playing Aussie Rules, which remains significantly cheaper in comparison.

In Sydney’s inner west, families registering their children with the Strathfield Strikers Football Club are paying around $480 just for registration, and that’s before adding in the cost of uniforms, boots, shin pads, training gear, and travel.

For many households already dealing with the pressures of inflation, rising grocery bills, rent, and fuel prices, those football-related expenses can quickly become overwhelming.

As a result, Alexandra Georgopoulos, the female football co-officer at Strathfield Strikers, says one of the biggest challenges her club faces is the struggle to retain players because of the high costs.

In Victoria, Ringwood City is another example where fees for boys and girls under 12 and 13 start at $700, and they go up as the kids get older — something that’s led some families to pull their children out.

High registration fees are a major obstacle, particularly for families with more than one child playing, or those from culturally and economically diverse backgrounds, and as the cost of living continues to increase, families are being forced to make difficult choices.

So, what was once a fun and enriching activity is at risk of becoming inaccessible for many, especially for young girls at the grassroots level, where the foundations of the future women’s game are being built.

For women’s football in Australia to truly thrive long-term, the momentum from the Matildas’ success must be matched with meaningful support at the grassroots level.

That means tackling not only the lack of adequate facilities, but also the rising costs that are making the sport increasingly out of reach for many families.

Without serious investment in both infrastructure and affordability, we risk leaving behind the very girls and women who are meant to be the future of the game.

Previous ArticleNext Article

The A-Leagues Final Series important status also a secret hinderance

The Isuzu A-League finals series is a huge event in the footballing calendar, though its contribution to stagnant attendance numbers in the league is something to be said.

If the 2025/26 finals series follows similar patterns to those before it, it will gather huge traction and strong ticket sales.

It is the largest event for the domestic league, bringing in massive amounts of viewership through media and gate receipts.

Finals series from years past have shown this, with the 2024/25 final, a Melbourne derby, being sold out within 48 hours and gathering significant viewership online.

The idea of a finals series lies within the Australian sporting ethos; the other sporting codes have had this tradition for most of their existence, especially in recent history.

Football, though, is different from the rest of the sporting codes in Australia, unique even. This has historically contributed to its inability to integrate into the same supported status as other codes.

Many in the Australian footballing community, supporter groups, players, coaches, and even the new Director of Football Australia, have voiced concerns over fan numbers in the league competition.

It wouldn’t be absurd to say that maybe, though profitable now, the finals series is actually taking away from the league itself.

Consider the media image: the league winner is called the “minor premiership,” and ticket sales and viewership figures reveal a huge disparity between the two parts of the A-League.

It must be said that an alternative that could work in unison with the league and possibly increase viewership of the league itself would be a great advantage.

It would allow the league to gain more jeopardy and drama, which could build greater interest in attending league games.

One alternative is already here.

No other sporting code in Australia has both a league competition and a cup competition. Football in Australia does.

The Hahn’s Australia Cup is our equivalent to the FA Cup in England or the Copa del Rey in Spain.

These are competitions that offer a finals option in a different competition entirely. They generate huge traction while never diminishing the importance of the league and, therefore, its popularity.

These cup competitions cannot be discussed without acknowledging some obvious differences.

They don’t face the same popularity issues that football does in Australia. It’s obvious the Hahn’s Australia Cup doesn’t yet gain the traction that the finals series does.

However, for a healthy footballing environment with increasing fan numbers, it should.

The idea of elevating the Hahn’s Australia Cup and scaling back the finals series is a complex question, one that is treated like a “no-go zone” by many in the Australian footballing community, and that is understandable.

Though big changes like this might, in the end, be credible options for the future of the sport in this country.

Larger plans must be set in motion, strategies that can be worked towards and refined along the way. It is the process by which all large organisations, business models and even national governments build their strategies.

Such a shift will be scrutinised and pushed back against.

Though with further fine-tuning and smart investment in development, not to mention the introduction of promotion and relegation and the possibility of changing the footballing calendar.

It could replicate the success that these two-competition models already enjoy in other leagues.

The added importance that the premiership would gain, the reality that every game matters, could alongside other strategies entice fans to more games, increase viewership and ticket sales, and create more dedicated fan bases. It works in other nations, very well in fact.

The possibility of two teams lifting a trophy, rather than one single event defining it all, sounds like a strategy that could deliver more engagement over longer periods of time.

Maybe Australian football doesn’t need to answer this question just yet. It is complex, difficult and it would require a great deal of work, including significant investment into the game, which is another issue entirely.

Yet as low attendance numbers persist in the A-League, even alongside increased media viewership, something needs to change for football in Australia.

The rise in popularity of this game and its dedicated community deserves bold ideas and forward thinking.

Ideas like this could eventually begin to change the landscape of the beautiful game in Australia for the better.

From Broadcast to Betting: Where Australian Football Sits in a $417 Billion Sports Economy

The global sports industry is now worth an estimated $417 billion, but the headline figure only tells part of the story. Beneath it lies a more significant shift that reveals not just how much money sport generates, but where that money is actually coming from?

Globally, the traditional foundations of football’s business model are being overtaken. Sports betting alone accounts for $133 billion, meaning nearly one in every three dollars in the industry is now driven by wagering rather than watching.

For a sport historically built on attendance, broadcast and sponsorship, this marks a profound transformation.

 

The Rise of Participation Over Viewership

The fastest-growing segment of the global market, which is valued at $177 billion, is now the “gaming” ecosystem: betting, fantasy sports and video games. What unites these platforms is simple: they turn fans from passive viewers into active participants.

This is the new sports economy. Engagement is no longer confined to the 90 minutes on the pitch. Instead, it is continuous, interactive and, most importantly, monetisable.

For football, the opportunity is enormous. But so too is the risk. As betting becomes the dominant financial driver, the sport must confront difficult questions around integrity, regulation and long-term dependence on gambling-linked revenue.

 

A Global Boom, A Local Reality

While the global industry surges ahead, Australian football presents a more complex picture.

The A-Leagues’ current broadcast deal, reportedly worth around $200 million over five years, is modest when compared to the $61 billion global media rights market. It highlights the gap between Australia and football’s major commercial powerhouses — it also underscores the importance of maximising every available revenue stream.

At the same time, there are clear signs of growth.

The rise of the Matildas has transformed the commercial landscape, with the national team now widely viewed as a central revenue driver through sponsorship, broadcast and matchday demand. Record-breaking audiences — including 2.73 million viewers nationally for key fixtures — demonstrate football’s expanding cultural footprint.

Streaming, too, is reshaping the game locally. Football viewership on Paramount+ has surged by 138%, while the sport has reached nearly 10 million Australians over a 12-month period. These figures mirror the global trend away from traditional television toward digital platforms.

 

The Disconnect Between Growth and Revenue

Yet, despite rising audiences and renewed interest, financial stability remains a challenge.

The A-Leagues have faced ongoing pressures — from declining distributions to structural reform — revealing a critical tension at the heart of Australian football:

Attention is growing, but revenue is not keeping pace.

This disconnect reflects a broader structural issue. While global sport is rapidly monetising digital and interactive engagement, Australian football is still heavily reliant on more traditional income streams.

 

Why the Global Shift Matters

The implications of the global $417 billion market are clear.

The IP monetisation pillar ($154 billion), which encompasses media rights, sponsorship, merchandise and matchday, remains vital. But it is no longer enough on its own.

Meanwhile, broadcasting and streaming ($86 billion) is fragmenting. Pay TV still dominates, but streaming is rising fast, changing not just how fans watch football, but how value is captured.

Above all, the dominance of the gaming segment signals a new reality:

The future of sport lies in participation, not just consumption.

 

A Defining Moment for Australian Football

For Australian football, the challenge is not simply to grow — it is to align with where the global industry is heading.

That means:

  • Building stronger digital ecosystems
  • Leveraging data and fan engagement tools
  • Exploring new commercial models beyond traditional broadcast deals

Because while the global sports market is projected to reach $602 billion by 2030, that growth will not be evenly distributed.

It will favour the sports and leagues that can successfully integrate into a landscape defined by interactivity, personalisation and constant engagement.

 

More Than a Game

Football in Australia is not short on momentum. Participation is rising, the Matildas have captured national attention, and audiences are increasingly engaged.

But in a $417 billion global industry, momentum alone is not enough.

The question is no longer whether football can grow.

It is whether it can evolve fast enough to capture its share of where the money is going.

Most Popular Topics

Editor Picks

Send this to a friend