Beyond the Hype: Challenges for Women’s Football

Women’s football in Australia is thriving like never before, but behind the record-breaking crowds and rising participation lies a growing need for deeper, long-term support at the grassroots level.

It’s no surprise that women’s football has seen a major rise in popularity over the past few years.

A big part of that growth was driven by the 2023 FIFA Women’s World Cup, which was held right here in Australia.

The tournament saw the Matildas make an incredible run to the semi-finals, winning over the nation and breaking multiple television records in the process.

Channel 7 alone reached 18.6 million viewers throughout the tournament, and the Matildas’ semi-final against England became the most-watched TV program in more than 20 years, with an average audience of 7.2 million and a total reach of 11.15 million.

The impact went far beyond the screen, inspired by the Matildas’ performance and the excitement of hosting the tournament, more than 21,000 women and girls picked up football for the first time.

By the end of 2024, over 158,000 women and girls were playing across Australia — a 16% increase from the previous year.

But with this incredible rise in interest and participation, new challenges have started to surface — so what exactly are they?

One of the biggest areas in women’s football that still desperately needs support is adequate infrastructure.

As more women and girls take up the game, the pressure on clubs to provide adequate, modern facilities has grown — and in many cases, the infrastructure simply isn’t keeping up.

A 2024 report by Football Australia, revealed that only two in five clubs nationwide have change rooms that are considered female-friendly, that means a lot of clubs are still lacking basic necessities like separate spaces for men and women.

As the number of women and girls taking part in football continues to grow, these shortcomings are starting to seriously impact clubs on the ground.

David Cvetkovski, president of the Preston Lions Football Club, mentioned that after the Women’s World Cup, the club saw a 30% spike in girls signing up to play. While that level of interest is a positive sign for the sport, it has stretched the club’s resources thin — especially when it comes to basic facilities.

Right now, the Preston Lions don’t even have enough female toilets to accommodate the growing number of players.

Cvetkovski didn’t mince words, calling infrastructure investment in the women’s game “light years behind.” He believes this lack of development is holding back progress — and he’s not alone.

When clubs don’t have the right facilities, it’s not just an inconvenience; it directly limits players’ access to quality training environments, which in turn affects their development and performance.

Poor infrastructure also sends a bigger message, that the women’s game is still not being treated with the same seriousness or respect.

In response to these concerns, the Albanese Government introduced the “Play Our Way” program, pledging $200 million to improve infrastructure for women and girls in sport. The initiative aims to deliver safe, inclusive, and sustainable facilities, equipment, and support across Australia.

While the program has certainly helped, some — including former Socceroo and advocate Craig Foster — believe it still falls short.

That concern grows even louder when you consider football officials estimate that $2.9 billion is needed just to bring grassroots facilities across the country up to standard.

Right now, the growth of women’s football — especially at the grassroots level — is moving faster than the funding and resources trying to support it.

Without long-term, targeted investment in infrastructure, there’s a real risk that the progress made in women’s football could stall.

And that would mean countless girls and women missing out on the opportunity to thrive, develop, and feel truly supported in the sport they love.

Another major challenge currently facing women and girls in football is the growing cost of participating at the grassroots level. While financial barriers impact both the men’s and women’s sides of the sport, the effect on the women’s game is especially concerning.

At a time when there is a strong push to grow, develop, and create more opportunities for female players, however, rising costs are threatening to slow that momentum.

Although football is often seen as an accessible sport, the reality for many families tells a different story.

According to an AusPlay survey conducted between July 2023 and December 2024, the average annual cost for a child to play football was $513—more than double the average cost of playing Aussie Rules, which remains significantly cheaper in comparison.

In Sydney’s inner west, families registering their children with the Strathfield Strikers Football Club are paying around $480 just for registration, and that’s before adding in the cost of uniforms, boots, shin pads, training gear, and travel.

For many households already dealing with the pressures of inflation, rising grocery bills, rent, and fuel prices, those football-related expenses can quickly become overwhelming.

As a result, Alexandra Georgopoulos, the female football co-officer at Strathfield Strikers, says one of the biggest challenges her club faces is the struggle to retain players because of the high costs.

In Victoria, Ringwood City is another example where fees for boys and girls under 12 and 13 start at $700, and they go up as the kids get older — something that’s led some families to pull their children out.

High registration fees are a major obstacle, particularly for families with more than one child playing, or those from culturally and economically diverse backgrounds, and as the cost of living continues to increase, families are being forced to make difficult choices.

So, what was once a fun and enriching activity is at risk of becoming inaccessible for many, especially for young girls at the grassroots level, where the foundations of the future women’s game are being built.

For women’s football in Australia to truly thrive long-term, the momentum from the Matildas’ success must be matched with meaningful support at the grassroots level.

That means tackling not only the lack of adequate facilities, but also the rising costs that are making the sport increasingly out of reach for many families.

Without serious investment in both infrastructure and affordability, we risk leaving behind the very girls and women who are meant to be the future of the game.

Previous ArticleNext Article

Football Australia and CommBank announce major agreement

Football Australia and CommBank have announced a major new agreement, committing to a substantial six-year investment in the future of Australian football.

As part of the deal, CommBank will become Football Australia’s primary sponsor across all levels of the game.

This builds on CommBank’s support of the CommBank Matildas, ParaMatildas, and Pararoos, and now includes naming rights for the Socceroos and youth championships.

The partnership will focus on keeping young Australians in the game, from grassroots to elite, while helping discover and develop future stars through top youth tournaments.

Since partnering in 2021, CommBank has helped drive a 27% rise in women’s and girls’ football, and Matildas matches have seen over 17 straight sell-outs.

Through the Growing Football Fund, over 230 local clubs have received grants to grow the game in their communities.

Together, CommBank and Football Australia are committed to making football inclusive and accessible for all Australians.

CommBank’s CEO Matt Comyn called this the most thrilling chapter yet for the sport in Australia.

“With the Socceroos facing the upcoming FIFA World Cup 2026, and the CommBank Matildas preparing for the Australian-hosted AFC Women’s Asia Cup, there has never been a more exciting time to be a fan of football in Australia,” Comyn said in a press release.

“When we partnered with Football Australia as naming rights sponsors of the CommBank Matildas, they were about to embark on a history making international campaign, and what an incredible amount they’ve achieved for Australian football and women’s sport since 2021.

“CommBank is proud to play our part in extending the incredible growth we’ve seen in the female game over the past few years into all facets of the game, including the men’s, para athletes and youth competitions – we are committed to promoting supporting inclusivity, keeping communities connected, and ensuring a brighter future for all.”

Interim Football Australia CEO Heather Garriock said the renewed partnership with CommBank is a values-driven collaboration focused on growing the game for all Australians.

“We are beyond delighted to take this next step in our relationship with CommBank and continue with our joint purpose of creating a game that is accessible to and loved by all Australians,” Garriock said in a press release.

“CommBank have been incredible partners since 2021 – in the four years since, we have together taken the women’s and para games from strength to strength, and we cannot wait to extend this success into other programs.

“This is so much more than a sponsorship agreement, it is a values-aligned business partnership through which we will innovate and support each other in many ways – with a core aim of improving the lives of Australians through the world game right across the country. We look forward to embarking on this next step in our journey together.”

Starting from the 1st of September 2025, CBA will be the official naming rights partner of both the CommBank Matildas and the newly named CommBank Socceroos.

Together, CommBank and Football Australia are shaping a stronger, more inclusive future for football across the nation.

NSW synthetic fields guideline: securing the future of sport

As demand for sporting fields continues to increase, NSW’s new guidelines for synthetic fields are a welcome manual to the decision-making behind the management and implementation of these fields. Though the question of how it tackles this critical issue persists.

Just this month, the NSW Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure released its Synthetic Turf Sports Fields in Public Open Space: Guideline for Decision-Makers.

A comprehensive study that outlines the application of creating more community-based synthetic fields in NSW, backed up by former NSW reports.

The Guideline is broken up into two chapters:

  • Section 2: Decision making for sports field surfaces – provides key information, considerations, and resources to help inform the decision-making process for selecting a sports field surface. This includes the pressures on public open space, the types of surfaces available to meet community needs, and the social, environmental, health, and economic considerations.
  • Section 3: Guide for synthetic turf sports fields – provides advice for projects considering and developing synthetic turf sports fields. It guides the reader on how to achieve best practice when planning, designing, delivering, and managing synthetic turf assets.

As stated in this guideline, it was produced due to the necessary need for synthetic fields to be created to keep up with a number of sporting demands.

Majorly, a growing increase in population of the state, with the population of NSW forecast to grow by 85,000 people each year, reaching 9.8 million by 2041 as outlined in the guideline.

There is also the need for reliable and safe sporting facilities for the community, making the demand and capacity of these fields necessary.

Just last year Football NSW and its associations were facing the tough reality of weather impacts as a winter of heavy rain made many of the natural grass fields unplayable.

With too few synthetic fields to use state wide, thousands of players over the state had shortened seasons and struggling management of the scheduling was met with a huge discourse of disappointment.

As is the nature of Australian sport, many codes must compete for very little space, especially when these spaces are council owned. The preparing of this is no easy task and central to this guideline.

This guideline is comprehensive and valuable for the creation of desperately needed synthetic fields.

The document combines the importance of balancing sustainability, functionality and community needs when considering synthetic turf for sports fields.

This can only be achieved through thoughtful stakeholder engagement in planning to creating multi-faceted spaces with a strong guideline of principles to make the decision of development.

This is a successful start and a very important document for the functional push for more synthetic fields and a huge step forward in providing the grounds for the production for more sporting facilities.

However, one problem is evident. The speed of production of synthetic fields, like any development, cannot fit the speed of demand.

This report importantly outlines the need of all fields is evident and also the ways in which these decisions should be made for synthetic or not. The case study of Allan Border oval in the paper is a perfect example.

Though another case study is an example in the Northern Beaches of Sydney displays the growing situation in another sense.

A local football summer competition called Small Sided Game (SSG) has voiced concerns about its reduced space allocation as the council decided for the coming playing season. Usually played on several grass fields, as it has been classified as a high-impact sport has been reserved to a singular synthetic field for the upcoming season.

The business has calculated that this would mean the loss of around 1000 participants from an average 3,500 participant strong season. A tough reality for the business as it loses such a large part of its revenue.

It is also a huge loss for the community as a thriving local business and summer sport will be considerably constrained and many people will be missing out on this vital activity.

Other environmental and health issues are associated with synthetic fields, such as the impact of injuries on the surface and the dangerous presence of carcinogenic microplastics.

Synthetic fields contribute to plastic migration and rising local temperatures, as heat islands effects potentially worsening soil and water pollution.

These issues have been presented in the guidelines and its relative supporting studies; therefore, they are factored into the overall guideline.

The problem remains, sports a vital part of our Australian culture and community needs to be able to grow physically with its demand.

Yet, is a synthetic revolution the only option?

Natural turf, available in many areas already, needs to be more effectively maintained and preserved, not just due to the logistical demands but for the community and environment demands, grass fields are crucial.

The NSW government needs to find a way to encourage the creation of synthetic fields but also more effectively maintain existing grass fields in a multi-pronged approach.

Football Australia’s $3 billion plan presented to the federal government has stated the need for funding in the growing demand. Synthetic fields and field upgrades is central to this request.

This document is the perfect start to push the necessary development process in the coming years, in conjunction with a multi-pronged approach with quick relief for existing fields and longer development for which synthetic fields is needed.

Otherwise, if situations like the one happening with SSG will continue to affect our communities, the participants who are the backbone of Australian sporting community are the ones who take the biggest hit.

The positive impact of leisure activities on physical, mental and communal health cannot be understated.

If maintaining access to sport — one of Australia’s most important cultural pillars — requires investment, then it must be made. Especially for football, the most played sport in both NSW and the nation.

There are little other endeavours that could trump its importance.

You can read the full report here.

Most Popular Topics

Editor Picks

Send this to a friend