LEDiL: Producing more effective football stadium lighting

LEDiL was first founded in 2002 by Tomi Kuntze and Hannu Hukkanen who designed LED lighting solutions for the automotive industry.

In their 22 years of existence, the company have released 15 specialist products, nine of them indoors and the other six outdoors.

The company have released a blueprint for both their ‘Sports Indoor Lighting’ and ‘Sports Outdoor Lighting’ products which cover multiple different sports and the dimensions of their usual playing ground, with a solution on how to create competitive lighting best effectively.

However focusing on football, LEDiL’s S Beam lighting systems are the solution to clubs wanting effective and compliant stadium floodlighting with the needs and requirements of the leagues they play in.

The technology is complex and has been a project that the company have worked on for a while before being first utilised by FK Mačva, the club on top of the Serbian first division.

How does S beam lighting work?

S-beam is a semi-symmetrical beam intended for stadium lighting with special shape of light distribution consisting of two cut-off zones and effective uniformity zone.

With traditional symmetrical beam lighting, it creates an oval-shaped area of light meaning that the light must be titled upwards in order to cover enough space for the clubs to reach the necessary lighting requirements.

This compromise leads to a worse viewing experience for fans at the ground, broadcasters who film the matches on worse lighting, effects the players performance during the match and increases light pollution in the nearby areas of the neighbourhood.

The lens directs the beam from the LEDs more efficiently by controlling the spill light vertically and providing more light to all areas of the ground.

Benefits of LEDiL LED system

– The use of LEDs has resulted in an energy saving of more than 55% reduction in energy costs.

– Reduced energy consumption leading to vastly reduced electrical installation costs and a faster payback.

– The calculated lifetime of the installation is up to 20 times longer than a conventional halogen solution, leading to a considerable saving in maintenance costs for clubs. This is a massive benefit with costs being a main reason why clubs stay away from starting upgrades.

– Improved lighting conditions for players (Training, ability to host night matches).

– Better viewing experience for the fans at the ground.

Optics

Optics distribute the power of LEDs efficiently, something that is especially important in larger sporting arenas and stadiums.

LEDiL utilise their optics to also reduce power consumption and the number of other components such as LEDs and further reducing the investment needed.

Optics play an essential role in ensuring lighting meets the strict league and competition requirements of different sporting codes, especially football.

Similarly to LEDs, Optics save cost and reduce time of instalment which increases efficiency.

How Australian football can use LEDiL

LEDiL currently doesn’t have a presence in Australia and their simple but effective LED and Optics system is perfect for NPL and State League clubs.

The company’s experience in urban and local areas would improve many parks and grounds that require a better lighting standard.

For a country that is rather tight on its football budget, saving money and being more sustainable is important and the values coincide with LEDiL’s business model, making it a really good fit.

Conclusion

The LED lighting future is one that mirrors the company’s vision which is to enhance wellbeing and safety with a goal for a more sustainable future and improved quality of life.

LEDiL are the future of sports stadium lighting, and the efficiency of the product will be a hot commodity in the industry.

Previous ArticleNext Article

Stan Sport Publicly Celebrates Premier League Rights Extension – But The Australian Indicates Otherwise

Nine Entertainment last week celebrated the extension of its broadcast rights to screen the English Premier League in Australia until the end of the 2033/34 season, but further examination has revealed that privately, they may be counting the cost.

On Monday, The Australian revealed not only have subscribers to Stan Sport – Nine’s over-the-top sports streaming service which shows the Premier League – been dropping over the past twelve months, but that the company ‘bet on itself’ in the self-driven process of negotiating its new deal.

While Nine would not reveal the price it paid for its six-year extension, The Australian believes it to be approximately $810million. Given there was no tender process, there report outlays the possibility they’ve significantly overpaid on what rival broadcasters may have valued the rights.

The Australian is published by News Corp Australia, a significant and long-time media rival of Nine.

Stan Sport has recently commenced its second season as Australia’s home of the Premier League, following its 2025 acquisition of the rights from the now-defunct Optus Sport. Under the terms of that acquisition agreement – which runs until the end of 2027/28 – Nine pays a relative bargain of $60million per season.

But from 2028/29, they’ll be investing considerably more into what they already hold, and at a point when subscriptions are declining. The Australian made further revelations that subscriptions had fallen from a high of 800,000 last September (roughly coinciding with the start of their Premier League coverage) to 730,000 earlier this month.

The company’s share price has also hit an all-time low of 77c on Friday, down 15.85 per cent for the week.

In addition to the English Premier League, Stan Sport is also the Australian home of the Champions League and other UEFA competitions, England’s Women’s Super League, and select matches of the FA Cup and a diverse offering of tennis – including the three non-Australian Grand Slams – and Rugby Union.

Nine has also recently paid $145million to retain the rights to three live NRL matches per round.

Has football become too expensive for its own supporters?

Football has never been more valuable.

Broadcast rights continue to generate billions of dollars, commercial partnerships are growing in scale, and clubs are investing heavily in new stadiums, technology and fan experiences. On the surface, the business of football appears to be in excellent health.

But there is a question worth asking.

As clubs continue searching for new revenue streams, are they making it harder for the very people who built the game to remain part of it?

The Rising Cost of Being a Football Fan

Over the past decade, supporting a football club has become increasingly expensive. Ticket prices have risen, particularly at Europe’s biggest clubs; for example, Manchester United have recently increased ticket prices for a fourth consecutive year.

The debate reached a global audience during the 2026 FIFA World Cup. Ticket prices prompted widespread criticism from supporter groups, with concerns over dynamic pricing and the overall cost of attending matches.

For many travelling fans, the cost extended well beyond admission, with flights, accommodation and local transport adding to an already significant financial commitment.

Even national team kits surged in price: Nike’s replica kits for nations such as England, France and Brazil retailed for €110 ($178 AUD), while the official match versions blew out as far as €110 ($260 AUD)

FIFA defended its adoption of the United States’ dynamic pricing model, arguing low prices would lead to inflated secondary market prices, which meant less money going back into football.

Yet the backlash highlighted a growing tension between maximising commercial returns and preserving accessibility for the game’s loyal supporters. Football Supporters Europe released a statement following the release of tickets, describing the prices as a “monumental betrayal to the tradition of the World Cup.”

None of these decisions exist in isolation.

Football clubs face rising operating costs, increasing player wages and growing expectations around facilities, technology and supporter engagement.

Stadium redevelopments, academy investment and player recruitment all require significant financial investment. Finding new sources of revenue has become a commercial necessity rather than a luxury.

Football Clubs Are Becoming Entertainment Businesses

Modern football clubs are no longer operating solely as sporting organisations. Many have evolved into entertainment businesses, with stadiums hosting concerts, corporate events, hospitality experiences and conferences alongside football matches.

From Tottenham Hotspur Stadium to Real Madrid’s redeveloped Santiago Bernabéu, clubs are investing in assets designed to generate income every day of the year, not just on matchday. 

Since moving to Tottenham Hotspur Stadium, matchday revenue has more than doubled over the last ten years and commercial revenue has nearly tripled during that same period

That strategy makes practical business sense.

The concern is whether supporters are gradually becoming customers first and fans second.

Loyalty Isn’t Transactional

Sport has always been different from other forms of entertainment because loyalty is rarely transactional. Supporters do not simply choose another club if prices rise or performances decline.

Many inherit their club through generations, travelling thousands of kilometres and investing countless hours because of an emotional connection that cannot be measured on a balance sheet.

That relationship is one of football’s greatest commercial strengths, but it also creates a responsibility.

Every pricing decision, whether it involves tickets, memberships or merchandise, should consider not only the revenue it generates today but the supporters it may exclude tomorrow.

The Cost of Watching Football

The cost of supporting a club doesn’t end once the final whistle blows. For many supporters, following football now also means paying for access to the game itself.

In Australia, broadcast rights are spread across multiple platforms, meaning fans who want to watch the A-League, Premier League, UEFA competitions and other major European leagues need several subscriptions. 

Individually, each service may represent reasonable value, but collectively they have increased the cost of following football throughout an entire season.

Broadcast Deals Come With Benefits

There is, however, another side to the argument. Broadcast rights are one of football’s biggest revenue streams, funding everything from player wages and production quality to grassroots investment and the continued growth of women’s football.

Broadcasters are paying significant sums for exclusive rights because live sport remains one of the few forms of content capable of attracting large audiences in real time. Without those investments, many competitions would struggle to maintain their current standard both on and off the pitch.

The issue, then, isn’t that football is harder to watch. It’s that following it has become increasingly fragmented. With matches spread across different platforms and services, football may be more accessible than ever, yet actually keeping up with the game can feel more challenging than ever before. 

A supporter shouldn’t need multiple subscriptions simply to follow their club, their national team and Europe’s biggest competitions. As football’s media landscape becomes more complex, convenience risks becoming another cost borne by supporters.

The recent Australia Cup match between South Melbourne and Preston Lions offered a timely reminder of what football looks like when supporters feel connected to their clubs. An official crowd of 6,673 created a vibrant atmosphere that translated brilliantly on television, or free on Football Australia’s YouTube channel.

The spectacle wasn’t driven by premium hospitality or corporate experiences. It was driven by passionate fans filling the stands and creating a classic football environment.

Finding the Balance

The challenge for football is finding the balance between commercial success and supporter accessibility.

Clubs, leagues and governing bodies don’t necessarily need to lower every ticket’s price or abandon lucrative broadcast deals. But they should continue asking whether growth is making the game easier to experience or simply more expensive to follow.

That could mean preserving affordable ticket categories, simplifying access to live broadcasts, investing in community initiatives or ensuring stadiums remain places where families and lifelong supporters feel welcome. Commercial innovation and supporter accessibility do not have to be mutually exclusive.

Football’s commercial growth is essential. Without it, clubs cannot invest in players, facilities or community programmes.

But growth should never come at the expense of accessibility.

The most successful clubs of the future will not simply be those that generate the highest revenues. They will be the ones that continue to fill their stadiums with supporters who feel they belong.

After all, football’s greatest asset has never been its broadcast deals or sponsorship agreements.

It has always been the people in the stands.

Most Popular Topics

Editor Picks

Send this to a friend