The Queensland Election: the promises for the sporting community

Queenslanders will go to the voting booths on October 26th, as the political campaigns ramp up for the final weeks, below are the outlined sporting election promises from major parties.

A big issue for voters at this year’s election is the growing development for the 2032 Olympic and Paralympic games and the expensive ordeal that comes with hosting one of the world’s biggest sporting events.

Outlined below are the promises and plans made by the differing parties.

Queensland Labor Party

The Queensland Labor Party is focused on the 2022 Activate! Queensland Strategy Accelerated its 5-year plan to 2025 and has recently brought out several sporting grants for next year to assist Queenslanders in grassroots sport.

The Minor Infrastructure Fund utilises 45 million dollars to make local sports grounds safe, easily accessible and encourages more inclusivity in the sporting environment.

Fair play vouchers under the new premier Steven Miles have been revamped with vouchers being upgraded from $150 to $200 to deal with the cost-of-living crisis. The Number of vouchers has also been upgraded number from 50,000 to up to 200,000.

The Community and Recreational Assets Recovery and Resilience Program, assisted by the federal government is a 75-million-dollar project to help sporting facilities damaged by the natural disasters of 2021-22.

The Labor party made headlines when it was decided that it wouldn’t build new venues for the 2032 Olympics, however, they did invest to restructure current venues.

Liberal National Party of Queensland (LNP)

Recently the Liberal party leader at Pine Rivers Football Club committed to investing 3.8 million dollars to the local facility. This launched the party’s proposed sports program Games On!

Up to 250 million dollars dedicated to grassroots sporting clubs up to the 2032 Olympics. This funding will help deliver new or upgraded fields and courts, clubhouses, changerooms, or lighting.

David Crisafulli running state premier for the LNP has also said they will do a 100-day review on the infrastructure for the Olympic games and if there is a need for private and public funding for a new stadium for the Olympics.

The Queensland Greens

The Greens have been more vocal about sporting options announcing a $2.53 billion sporting package aimed at getting every young Queenslander into the game.

The Free Season pass plan will offer every Queenslander under 18 one free sporting program and a $150 equipment bonus costing $381 million on a four-year program.

Local sporting clubs are set to receive a major boost with $25,000 annual grants for registered clubs. The Greens are investing $50 million yearly to accommodate an expected surge of 110,000 new players.

Additionally, 200 million dollars will be dedicated to securing new sporting fields, with a strategic focus on flood-prone areas and high-growth suburbs facing space shortages.

Overall, all parties mentioned have delivered a range of plans to continue to support the sporting community in Queensland.

The Labor Party, as the current government is maintaining their original strategy from years past till 2025, more expansive plans will have to come later, though not expressing them leaves questions for their future endeavours.

The Liberals have announced their major funding but haven’t presented the promise with much detail to the public, it’s an exciting endeavour and if they win the majority in the coming election, the public will demand more understanding of how this funding will work out.

The Greens have outlined a comprehensive strategy to help sport but their position as a minor party puts them in a difficult place for gaining any power to deliver.

Elections at the state level focus on the big issues at heart and sport, especially football, has many times taken the backseat.

However, football, the state’s most participated sport, holds great importance in the local communities and their reliance on government funding does not go unnoticed by the general public.

With the Olympic games putting the spotlight on the state, will these parties keep their promises to promote Queensland sports and football? Time will tell.

Previous ArticleNext Article

Brazil is coming. But what is the real price of bringing football’s giants to Australia?

There is something undeniably exciting about Brazil coming to Australia. The five-time World Cup winners will face the Socceroos twice in Queensland from Friday, with Townsville and Brisbane set to host the blockbuster fixtures.

For Australian football, these are the kind of games that should be anticipated, celebrated and capture the public’s attention. But they also raise questions: how much should Australian football pay to bring the world’s biggest nations here, and when does the bill become too big? 

The cost of bringing the big names

Australia has always paid up to bring big names down under. Last week’s NFL game in Melbourne, at a cost of between $10 and 15 million dollars to the Victorian Government, is just the latest example.

It could cost the same amount to bring Brazil to Queensland. A report in The Sydney Morning Herald last year revealed Brazil was reportedly seeking around $7.5 million per match to play in Australia. The fee is in line with other major international events; Western Australia reportedly faced a bill of around $12 million in taxpayer funding for the recent Perth Italian Football Festival.

I’m worried Football Australia won’t get return on investment to make this particular event worthwhile. The enormous fee to bring Brazil to Australia can’t immediately be justified as an investment in our footballing future. Instead, Football Queensland and the state government could have put these funds into grassroots facilities. Part of Football Queensland’s scrapped state headquarters investment plan was to spend $8.5 million to refurbish fields, lights, drains and irrigation at Mappas and Meakin parks. Instead of these plans to invest in the state’s youth players and academies, money has been spent on two international friendlies.

So ahead of the fixtures, the question remains: will these games inspire the future generation, and will participation grow? The NFL match was impossible to ignore: a sold-out MCG and a live audience of 2.1 million on free-to-air, not even including those watching on ESPN and Netflix. Football Australia is not simply buying 90 minutes of football; it is buying the attention that comes with Brazil. So let’s see if they can maximize returns. 

Ticketing Tells a Story

Ticket sales provide insight into the interest in the fixture. Brisbane has sold much quicker than Townsville, but neither have sold out as yet. The fact these games didn’t immediately sell out may be considered surprising as there is a genuine appetite in Australia for elite international football at the moment, evidenced by SBS’ World Cup viewership numbers of 17.1 million.

Brazil is bringing some of its brightest stars: Vinicius Junior, Raphinha, Bruno Guimaraes, Marquinhos and Endrick are among the headline names in their squad. The star power is there. So why haven’t these matches sold out? There’s a chance it comes down to the competition and the visibility of the event.

The viewing problem

The timing of this fixture could raise eyebrows amongst fans. As much as Australia and Brazil will draw huge crowds, both games fall on either side of the AFL Grand Final. The 2024 AFL Grand Final, which involved Queensland’s Brisbane Lions, drew over 4 million viewers on free-to-air. Brisbane, who have won the last two premierships, will feature once again on Grand Final day. Therefore, fans who could’ve attended may instead be making the trip to Melbourne.

Then comes the strangest part: one of the fixtures Australia will play will not even be available on free-to-air television. The Townsville match will be shown free on Network 10 and 10 Streaming, as well as Paramount+. The Brisbane match, however, will be available exclusively on Paramount+. That creates a disconnect. If governments and football administrators are spending millions to bring a global sporting brand to Australia, why should a large section of the Australian public need a subscription to watch the second match?

The Brisbane game is behind a paywall, limiting the national reach of the event. Reach is surely part of the justification for spending big on Brazil, it’s not just that 50,000 people get to sit inside Suncorp Stadium. It is that millions of Australians get exposed to the spectacle and if that audience is restricted, the value of this fixture is limited.

A solution could be to spend the money on advertising the match to the public to try to generate interest across streaming and free-to-air. With less than a week until the first game I don’t believe the advertising has done enough to generate enough interest to justify a $15 million price tag for the two game series. 

The Brazil friendlies will be spectacular. They should attract big crowds, create memories and give the Socceroos an excellent test against one of football’s most recognisable nations. But for the appropriate return, attention must be measured. Does this fixture carry on the Socceroos hype and keep the eyeballs of the general public on our sport? I’m not convinced. However, if these matches bring new fans to football, strengthen the national team and create lasting investment in the sport, the enormous price tag could still be justified. But if they simply produce two nights of football before the attention disappears, then Australian football has paid a premium for a very expensive show.

Adelaide United renews StudyAdelaide partnership for Asian campaign

Adelaide United has brought back a familiar commercial partner for its return to continental competition, with StudyAdelaide signing on as front-of-shirt sponsor for the club’s 2026/27 AFC Champions League Two campaign.

The partnership reconnects two South Australian organisations after StudyAdelaide previously featured on Adelaide United’s shirt during their 2010 AFC Champions League campaign.

Adelaide commenced their six-match group-stage campaign on Thursday at Hindmarsh, defeating Hong Kong’s Tai Po 3-0.

For StudyAdelaide, the value of the partnership extends beyond traditional football sponsorship. The organisation, a partnership between the South Australian Government and more than 50 education institutions, is using Adelaide United’s Asian competition to promote South Australia as an international study destination.

The club’s continental schedule provides exposure in several key Asian markets, with Adelaide travelling to face BG Pathum United in Thailand and Lion City Sailors in Singapore during the group stage.

StudyAdelaide chief executive Jane Johnston said the partnership would provide a great opportunity to connect with young people across Asia.

“Having StudyAdelaide featured throughout this international competition is a unique platform to connect with young people across Asia and highlight the many reasons South Australia is their best option to study, live and build a career,” Johnston said.

The deal illustrates how football’s international competitions can provide commercial value beyond traditional brand exposure, particularly for organisations looking to promote to a specific or new region.

The Reds’ ACL Two campaign continues against BG Pathum United in Thailand on October 15.

Most Popular Topics

Editor Picks

Send this to a friend