FA CEO James Johnson opens up on difficulties in the game and opportunities for the future

Speaking at Football Victoria’s Community in Business event on Friday, Football Australia CEO James Johnson reflected on his first 14 months in the top job of the sport, detailing the difficulties the organisation faced in 2020 and the opportunities it has in the coming years.

“I’d like to share with you what I walked into in January 2020,” Johnson told the audience in Melbourne.

“I walked into Football Australia and what I understood from the off was that the organisation had really lost a sense of unity. I believe the organisation had lost its connection with the community.”

Johnson criticised the focus of the governing body’s financial model, believing it was not looking after the best interests of the game overall.

“The business model was heavily centred on the A-League,” he said.

“That was what decision making evolved around, while other parts of the game, in my opinion, were neglected. The business model was disconnected, fractured and was inefficient. It was inefficient because of the duplication of administration. It wasn’t set up to foster growth for a thriving football ecosystem.

“The model denied the most significant part of our game, our identity, our community, our people, our stories, our diverse and multicultural base and our great national teams.

“In place of this identity, we’ve allowed a narrative to proliferate over the past 10-15 years that is divided, politicised, old soccer against new football, but this is not what our game is.”

Football Australia CEO James Johnson

The former Brisbane Strikers player admits that the game is far from perfect in this country and needs to address a range of issues.

“We have some really serious challenges ahead of us,” he said.

“We don’t own enough facilities for our growing base, we have too many players, we are turning children and families away from our code because we don’t have enough infrastructure around the country. This is a real issue.

“The performance gap that we released in 2020 tells us that the age group that plays the most minutes in our elite men’s competition (the A-League) is the age of 32. We are not giving enough opportunities for our players under 23. We also have challenges with our football pyramid, we must reconnect our pyramid so we can unleash this potential of an ecosystem.”

Since Johnson was appointed as CEO early last year, the governing body has shifted their business model allowing them to deliver strategic priorities and focus on initiatives such as: the implementation of the domestic match calendar, the proposed introduction of a domestic transfer system, a half slot to the ACL for the FFA Cup winner and more. Johnson believes factors such as these are vital to reconnecting Australian football’s national pyramid.

In his speech at the Community in Business event, the former senior executive at the AFC, FIFA and the City Football Group also strongly emphasised the importance of recognising the game’s history properly, something the game has continued to neglect in previous years.

“We have a rich history and it must be celebrated,” he said.

“There are moments in our game, that not only shaped the game, but they shaped the way that our country is. In 1974, we sent our first men’s team to the World Cup led by Rale, in 1993 Maradona came here, in 1997 Iran broke our hearts, in 2005 a famous penalty got us to our first World Cup in many decades and in 2020 we won the rights to host the Women’s World Cup.

“Our game is full of these moments and I think if you all think about those moments, people will remember where they were when they occurred. We forget that our clubs in this country predated federation. We forget that football was the first sport in Australia to have a national competition in the 70’s. We forget the first cup competition in this country was in the 60’s, the Australia Cup.

“We forget that women played football in this country as early as 1909. Nearly 42 years ago, our very first Matildas stepped out onto Seymour Shaw Park for the first Matildas match. Now, we are only a few years away from the biggest sporting event for women in the world coming to our shores.

“We forget that 99 years ago our Socceroos played their first match against New Zealand. We are one year away from 100 years.

“We forget the role that football played in the lives of indigenous children, like John Moriarty, Jade North and Kyah Simon.

“We forget that our national competitions have always been the hallmark of our game. The NSL for many, many years. Our history provides us with platforms to move forward to and to launch a bold, exciting future for our sport.”

Johnson addresses the audience at Football Victoria’s CIB event

Johnson sees the Women’s World Cup in 2023 on home soil as the perfect avenue to establish a strong future for the game.

“We are focused on creating that link between our national teams, in particular the Matildas and our community,” he said.

“Our base of 2 million participants is great, but only 22% per cent of our base are women and girls. There is a direct link between the importance and relevance of national teams and the base of community. With our national teams starting up again, you will see over the next 3 years (particularly with the Women’s World Cup) that our base will grow further and it will grow well.

Our ‘Legacy 23’ framework is an ambitious plan to maximise the opportunities that the legacy of the Women’s World Cup (WWC) will provide us. Legacy is not something that starts after the WWC, it started last month. We’ve got to try as best as possible to ensure the WWC has a long-lasting legacy, similar to what happened with the Sydney Olympics in 2000.”

The FA CEO concluded by calling on every single stakeholder to be open to change, including the governing body itself, and push forward to make the sport the best it can be.

“If we are to reach the potential of our game, each and every one of us, every stakeholder, Football Australia, Member Federations, clubs, leagues, our community need to be open to change,” he said.

“Change and innovation are the commodities that we must deal with in 2021. I’m under no illusions that Football Australia must continue to earn the trust and confidence back from our stakeholders and community. To do this, we need deeds not just words.

“Let’s seize this opportunity and put our best foot forward.”

Previous ArticleNext Article

FIFA Slammed Over Soaring World Cup Ticket Prices

biennial FIFA World Cup

FIFA has been criticised for its extremely controversial  under heavy fire for ticket prices and policy for next year’s men’s World Cup, to be co-hosted by the United States, Canada and Mexico.

A ten-day pre-sale window opened last week for Visa cardholders to register for tickets ahead of the October 1 release date.

But fans have blasted football’s global governing body for what it calls a “variable pricing” system, accusing FIFA of “living in a parallel universe” and showing little regard for supporters.

Under the policy, applicants allocated later purchase windows could be charged more for exactly the same seats.

FIFA insists variable pricing is different from dynamic pricing because human oversight, rather than an algorithm, sets the price changes, supposedly creating a gentler rise. Critics argue it’s still a cash grab.

New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani has launched a petition, “Game Over Greed,” demanding FIFA ditch the system, cap resale prices and reserve 15 per cent of tickets for local residents at a discount.

Ronan Evain, the executive director of Fans’ group Football Supporters Europe (FSE) echoed the outrage, warning that escalating costs will price out ordinary supporters.

“We think FIFA is sending the wrong message by putting (variable pricing) in place for the World Cup,” Evain said in a statement.

“Their key argument is the legal framework in the US wouldn’t allow them to do anything else – I find that very hard to believe.

“Where FIFA is being completely irresponsible is that it’s going to be an expensive World Cup – expensive to travel within the US, expensive to go to the stadium, with hardly any public transport.

“None of that is within FIFA’s control. What FIFA does control is the price of their tickets, and the one item where they could have acted to – at least symbolically – reduce the overall cost of the competition for match-going fans.”

To add to frustrations, many fans reported glitches while trying to enter the pre-sale draw, with prices hidden until after applications close on 19 September.

FIFA has confirmed only that group-stage tickets will “start from” AUD $90, with no upper limit publicly stated.

The backlash highlights a widening gap between FIFA and the people who fill stadiums. Unless the organisation reconsiders, next year’s World Cup could be remembered as much for its sky-high ticket costs as for the football itself, pricing out real football fans.

What’s Fuelling the Resurgence in Football Esports?

Esports are a growing enterprise built on the backs of several competitive games spanning genres, generations in software and global audiences. So, why has there been a resurgence in sports simulation now?

The FIFAe World Cup 2025 ft. eFootball begins its console and mobile qualifiers on the 18th of September this year, leading up to the main soccer Esports events in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, this December, with an unannounced prize pool.

The FIFAe World Cup 2024 ft. eFootball had a prize pool of nearly AUD $375,000, along with a peak in streaming viewership of under 415,000 between Twitch and YouTube, making it the most popular sport simulation event of the year.

Using statistics from the previous year’s prize pool and peak viewership, as well as this year’s Esports World Cup (EWC), which saw both Rocket League and EA Esports FC break peak viewership records (accumulating around 340,000 eyes), the upcoming tournament could see a higher audience count and possibly a boost in overall revenue.

To be fair, these are rookie numbers compared to the larger esports tournaments with Tier 1 viewership (League of Legends, Counter-Strike 2), which record millions of viewers and reward every major event. FIFA, Rocket League and EA Esports FC all rank in Tier 3 but are still able to be reasonably profitable.

Only a few years ago, online discourse and the investment capital of major esports teams (known as organisations), like FaZe, crashing on the stock market fuelled claims that the sub-genre sporting enterprise had died or was dying. Now, there seems to be a boost to the sport.

I believe it is due to Saudi Arabian influence in the sport and how FIFA and EA harness major revenue streams, both active and passive.

The Influence of Saudi Arabia and FIFA/EA

Esports organisations, like all sporting clubs, generate revenue from sponsorships, merchandise, licensing, etc. Depending on the popularity of the sport and them in each region will affect how much money is spent on houses (the esports form of clubs), sponsorships/partnerships, and so on. Fan engagement and stakeholders in the sport are just as important to the Socceroos as they are to the Chiefs.

Where it differs from conventional fan engagement is the monetary barrier of entry through broadcasting.

If a particular fan cannot make it to a live match, they watch it on television. If the game is played outside of their country, it’s usually going to be broadcasted on paid television, unless free-to-air channels can secure deals which cost millions of dollars for a multi-year licence.

Esports are practically free for viewers to watch through streaming services like Kick and Twitch, whose individual channels are owned by venue organisers and esports governing bodies who gain revenue from advertising, with kickbacks to the streaming service. And since the majority of esports fans are Gen Z, they are less likely to have disposable funds to pay to watch tournaments.

Saudi Arabian stakeholders in the Saudi Esports Federation, and partnerships FIFAe (the esports branch of FIFA) and EA among others, control the streaming rights and venue of the World Cups to present Saudi Arabia as the hub of esports.

The country’s governing body also gains ticket sales from tourists and attendees, funnelling revenue into the sport and increasing prize pools each year. The kingdom has also invested over AUD57 billion into the sport, which is estimated to create over 39,000 esports-related jobs by 2030, though the Asian and United States markets are much larger in overall fanbase.

However, the sport cannot run properly without every few years a new or updated title to release alongside events. The new soccer game, EA SPORTS FC 26 is set to release soon and though it won’t be played in the tournament, EA are set to see a spike in purchases before, during and after the World Cup finishes.

Electronic Arts had a hands-off approach in the early days of esports, letting competitions use licensed titles as the developer/publisher saw a correlation between the esports events and upticks in microtransaction purchases. In recent years, they have heavily promoted FIFA players to buy ‘packs’ with playable footballers from across the game to add to your roster.

Though FIFA and EA ended their esports partnership in 2023, they still have a working relationship via licencing rights ranging from player’s likeness to simulated leagues from around the world, as well as recreations of famous football grounds and kits.

FIFAe’s and EA’s steady stream of revenue from the tournaments derive from fans buying FIFA-related merchandise and electronic player packs for team builders in FIFA-licenced videogames.

The accumulated revenue will also see itself be put into organisations who are sponsored by either group, as well as the passive use of clubs in-game essentially being free advertising for the used football club.

Overall, the Saudi Esports Federation, FIFAe and EA have created a perfect storm which may bring the sport up to Tier 2 in the next few years.

Most Popular Topics

Editor Picks

Send this to a friend